/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 A particle is described by a wav... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A particle is described by a wave function \(\psi(x) = Ae^{-\alpha x^2}\), where A and \(\alpha\) are real, positive constants. If the value of \(\alpha\) is increased, what effect does this have on (a) the particle's uncertainty in position and (b) the particle's uncertainty in momentum? Explain your answers.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Increasing \( \alpha \) decreases position uncertainty and increases momentum uncertainty.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Wave Function

The wave function given is \( \psi(x) = Ae^{-\alpha x^2} \). This is a Gaussian wave function, representing the position probability distribution of a quantum particle.
02

Observation about the Width of the Wave Packet

The parameter \( \alpha \) affects the width of the Gaussian wave packet. As \( \alpha \) increases, the width of the wave packet becomes narrower in real space.
03

Relate Width to Uncertainty in Position

Using the relation \( \Delta x \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{\alpha}} \), we find that the uncertainty in position \( \Delta x \) is inversely proportional to \( \sqrt{\alpha} \). Thus, increasing \( \alpha \) decreases \( \Delta x \), meaning the uncertainty in position decreases.
04

Apply the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states \( \Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} \). If \( \Delta x \) decreases, \( \Delta p \), the uncertainty in momentum, must increase to satisfy this inequality because of the inverse relationship between position and momentum uncertainties.
05

Determine Effect on Particle's Uncertainty in Momentum

Thus, increasing \( \alpha \) results in an increase in \( \Delta p \), the uncertainty in momentum, due to the reciprocal relationship derived from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Wave Function
The wave function \(\psi(x) = Ae^{-\alpha x^2}\) is at the heart of quantum mechanics and describes the state of a quantum particle. This particular wave function is Gaussian, which means it forms a bell-shaped curve when graphed. The wave function itself doesn't give us direct information like the classical wave would; instead, it provides the probability distribution of finding a particle at a certain position. The presence of \(\alpha\) influences how spread out this wave function is. When you see a more spread-out wave function, the particle's location is less certain.
  • Amplitude (A): Determines the wave's height but not the importance of spread.
  • Gaussian Shape: The hallmark of this specific wave function, which implies rapid decrease as you move from the center.
Understanding the wave function is key because it quantitatively embodies how strange and wonderful quantum particles behave.
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics. It tells us that we can't exactly know both the position and momentum of a particle at the same time. Mathematically, it's represented as \(\Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}\). This means if we become more certain about where a particle is (position), we become less certain about how it's moving (momentum), and vice versa. Sometimes this principle can be confusing:
  • Position Uncertainty (\Delta x): How unsure we are about the particle's location.
  • Momentum Uncertainty (\Delta p): How unsure we are about the particle's momentum.
In the exercise, as \(\alpha\) increases, the position uncertainty decreases, forcing the momentum uncertainty to increase due to this principle.
Momentum Uncertainty
Momentum uncertainty, represented as \(\Delta p\), is a measure of how much we don't know about a particle's momentum. In quantum mechanics, due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, knowing a particle's position more precisely means knowing less about its momentum. When the \(\alpha\) in the wave function increases, the wave packet gets narrower, reducing position uncertainty. This inverse relationship means:
  • As \(\alpha\) gets larger, the particle's momentum uncertainty, \(\Delta p\), increases to maintain the principle balance.
  • This explains why it's challenging to measure exact momentum if a position is accurately known.
Conceptually, if the particle's position becomes tightly located, its "possible" velocities spread widely.
Position Uncertainty
Position uncertainty, denoted as \(\Delta x\), indicates the range in which a particle's position could be found. With the Gaussian wave function, \(\Delta x\) is related to \(\alpha\) as \(\Delta x \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{\alpha}}\). This shows:
  • Position uncertainty decreases as \(\alpha\) increases: the wave packet tightens.
  • More \(\alpha\) makes the particle's possible location more precise.
In our given exercise, when we increase \(\alpha\), the position uncertainty shrinks, concentrating the area where we're likely to find the particle. However, this shift results in increased momentum uncertainty due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, emphasizing the trade-off nature central to quantum mechanics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When an electron in a one-dimensional box makes a transition from the \(n\) = 1 energy level to the \(n\) = 2 level, it absorbs a photon of wavelength 426 nm. What is the wavelength of that photon when the electron undergoes a transition (a) from the \(n\) = 2 to the \(n\) = 3 energy level and (b) from the n = 1 to the \(n\) = 3 energy level? (c) What is the width \(L\) of the box?

Consider a wave function given by \(\psi(x) = A \space sin \space kx\), where \(k = 2\pi/\lambda\) and \(A\) is a real constant. (a) For what values of \(x\) is there the highest probability of finding the particle described by this wave function? Explain. (b) For which values of \(x\) is the probability \(zero\)? Explain.

When low-energy electrons pass through an ionized gas, electrons of certain energies pass through the gas as if the gas atoms weren't there and thus have transmission coefficients (tunneling probabilities) \(T\) equal to unity. The gas ions can be modeled approximately as a rectangular barrier. The value of \(T\) = 1 occurs when an integral or half-integral number of de Broglie wavelengths of the electron as it passes over the barrier equal the width \(L\) of the barrier. You are planning an experiment to measure this effect. To assist you in designing the necessary apparatus, you estimate the electron energies \(E\) that will result in \(T\) = 1. You assume a barrier height of 10 eV and a width of 1.8 \(\times\) 10\(^{-10}\) m. Calculate the three lowest values of \(E\) for which \(T\) = 1.

Protons, neutrons, and many other particles are made of more fundamental particles called \(quarks\) and \(antiquarks\) (the antimatter equivalent of quarks). A quark and an antiquark can form a bound state with a variety of different energy levels, each of which corresponds to a different particle observed in the laboratory. As an example, the \(\psi\) particle is a low-energy bound state of a so-called charm quark and its antiquark, with a rest energy of 3097 MeV; the \(\psi\)(2S) particle is an excited state of this same quark- antiquark combination, with a rest energy of 3686 MeV. A simplified representation of the potential energy of interaction between a quark and an antiquark is \(U(x) = A\mid x \mid\) , where \(A\) is a positive constant and \(x\) represents the distance between the quark and the antiquark. You can use the WKB approximation (see Challenge Problem 40.64) to determine the bound-state energy levels for this potential-energy function. In the WKB approximation, the energy levels are the solutions to the equation $$\int ^b _a \sqrt{2m[E - U(x)]} dx = {nh \over 2} \space (n = 1, 2, 3, . . .)$$ Here \(E\) is the energy, \(U(x)\) is the potential-energy function, and \(x\) = a and \(x\) = b are the classical turning points (the points at which \(E\) is equal to the potential energy, so the Newtonian kinetic energy would be zero). (a) Determine the classical turning points for the potential \(U(x) = A \mid x \mid\) and for an energy \(E\). (b) Carry out the above integral and show that the allowed energy levels in the WKB approximation are given by $$E_n = {1 \over2m} ( {3mAh \over 4} ) ^{2/3} n^{2/3} \space (n = 1, 2, 3, . . .)$$ (\(Hint\): The integrand is even, so the integral from \(-x\) to \(x\) is equal to twice the integral from 0 to \(x\).) (c) Does the difference in energy between successive levels increase, decrease, or remain the same as \(n\) increases? How does this compare to the behavior of the energy levels for the harmonic oscillator? For the particle in a box? Can you suggest a simple rule that relates the difference in energy between successive levels to the shape of the potential-energy function?

A particle of mass \(m\) in a one-dimensional box has the following wave function in the region \(x\) = 0 to \(x = L\) : $$\Psi(x, t) = {1\over \sqrt2} \psi_1(x)e^{-iE_1t/\hslash} + {1\over \sqrt 2} \psi_3(x)e^{-iE_3t/\hslash}$$ Here \(\psi_1(x)\) and \(\psi_3(x)\) are the normalized stationary-state wave functions for the \(n\) = 1 and \(n\) = 3 levels, and \(E_1\) and \(E_3\) are the energies of these levels. The wave function is zero for \(x <\) 0 and for \(x > L\). (a) Find the value of the probability distribution function at \(x = L\)/2 as a function of time. (b) Find the angular frequency at which the probability distribution function oscillates.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.