/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 76 (a) Consider the Galilean transf... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(a) Consider the Galilean transformation along the \(x\) -direction: \(x^{\prime}=x-\) vt and \(t^{\prime}=t .\) In frame \(S\) the wave equation for electromagnetic waves in a vacuum is $$\frac{\partial^{2} E(x, t)}{\partial x^{2}}-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} E(x, t)}{\partial t^{2}}=0$$ where \(E\) represents the electric field in the wave. Show that by using the Galilean transformation the wave equation in frame \(S^{\prime}\) is found to be $$\left(1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}\right) \frac{\partial^{2} E\left(x^{\prime}, t^{\prime}\right)}{\partial x^{\prime 2}}+\frac{2 v}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} E\left(x^{\prime}, t^{\prime}\right)}{\partial x^{\prime} \partial t^{\prime}}-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} E\left(x^{\prime}, t^{\prime}\right)}{\partial t^{\prime 2}}=0$$ This has a different form than the wave equation in \(S .\) Hence the Galilean transformation violates the first relativity postulate that all physical laws have the same form in all inertial reference frames. (Hint: Express the derivatives \(\partial / \partial x\) and \(\partial / \partial t\) in terms of \(\partial / \partial x^{\prime}\) and \(\partial / \partial t^{\prime}\) by use of the chain rule.) (b) Repeat the analysis of part (a), but use the Lorentz coordinate transformations, Egs. \((37.21),\) and show that in frame \(S^{\prime}\) the wave equation has the same form as in frame \(S :\) $$\frac{\partial^{2} E\left(x^{\prime}, t^{\prime}\right)}{\partial x^{2}}-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} E\left(x^{\prime}, t^{\prime}\right)}{\partial t^{\prime 2}}=0$$ Explain why this shows that the speed of light in vacuum is \(c\) in both frames \(S\) and \(S^{\prime} .\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Galilean transformation changes the wave equation's form, violating relativity. Lorentz transformation preserves it.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Given Equation in Frame S

The wave equation for electromagnetic waves in a vacuum in frame \(S\) is given as \(abla^{2} E(x, t) - \frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} E(x, t)}{\partial t^{2}} = 0\). This equation describes the behavior of electromagnetic waves in a vacuum.
02

Apply Galilean Transformation

Using the Galilean transformation along the \(x\)-direction, where \(x' = x - vt\) and \(t' = t\), we will express the spatial and temporal partial derivatives in terms of the new variables \(x'\) and \(t'\) using the chain rule.
03

Change of Variables Using Chain Rule

Using the chain rule for partial derivatives: \[\frac{\partial}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial x'}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial x'} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x'}\]\[\frac{\partial}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial x'}{\partial t} \frac{\partial}{\partial x'} + \frac{\partial t'}{\partial t} \frac{\partial}{\partial t'} = -v \frac{\partial}{\partial x'} + \frac{\partial}{\partial t'}\]
04

Apply Derivatives to the Wave Equation

Substitute these results into the wave equation: \[\frac{\partial^{2} E}{\partial x^{2}} = \frac{\partial^{2} E}{\partial x'^2}\]\[\frac{\partial^{2} E}{\partial t^{2}} = \left(-v \frac{\partial}{\partial x'} + \frac{\partial}{\partial t'}\right)^2 E\]
05

Simplify the Equation

Expanding the time derivative term using binomial expansion:\[\frac{\partial^{2} E}{\partial t^{2}} = \left(v^2 \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x'^2} - 2v \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x' \partial t'} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial t'^2}\right) E\]
06

Substitute Back into Original Equation

Place these into the original wave equation:\[\frac{\partial^{2} E}{\partial x'^2} - \frac{1}{c^2} \left(v^2 \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial x'^2} - 2v \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial x' \partial t'} + \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial t'^2}\right) = 0\]
07

Rearrange Terms to Get the Galilean Equation

Organizing the terms, we find:\[\left(1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}\right) \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial x'^2} + \frac{2v}{c^2} \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial x' \partial t'} - \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial t'^2} = 0\]
08

Explain Violation of Relativity Postulate

In this form, the wave equation in frame \(S'\) is different from that in frame \(S\), showing that the Galilean transformation does not preserve the form of the wave equation and thus violates the first relativity postulate.
09

Lorentz Transformation Analysis

Apply Lorentz transformations for \(x\) and \(t\): \[x' = \gamma (x - vt)\quad \text{and} \quad t' = \gamma \left(t - \frac{vx}{c^2}\right)\]where \(\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Wave Equation
The wave equation is a fundamental concept in physics. It describes how waves, such as electromagnetic waves, travel through a medium or space. It is particularly important when studying light and other forms of radiation. In a vacuum, the wave equation for electromagnetic waves is given by:
  • \( \frac{\partial^{2} E(x, t)}{\partial x^{2}} - \frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} E(x, t)}{\partial t^{2}} = 0 \)
where \( E(x, t) \) represents the electric field and \( c \) is the speed of light in a vacuum. The equation states that the second spatial derivative of the electric field minus the second time derivative of the electric field, scaled by the speed of light squared, is zero. This means that the changes in the electric field over space and time must be balanced.
To convert this equation to another frame of reference, transformations like the Galilean or Lorentz transformations can be used. However, only certain transformations manage to preserve the original form of this equation, maintaining the uniform speed of light across different reference frames.
Lorentz Transformation
The Lorentz transformation is crucial when dealing with high velocities, close to the speed of light. It offers a means to convert physical laws between different inertial frames without altering their form. The transformations for space and time are:
  • \( x' = \gamma (x - vt) \)
  • \( t' = \gamma \left(t - \frac{vx}{c^2}\right) \)
Here, \( \gamma \) is the Lorentz factor, defined as \( \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \). It accounts for time dilation and length contraction, the phenomena predicted by Einstein's theory of relativity.
When these transformations are applied, they ensure that the wave equation retains its original form. This means that the laws of physics, such as the constant speed of light, hold true regardless of how fast an observer is moving. Therefore, unlike the Galilean transformation, the Lorentz transformation adheres to the principle of relativity.
Principle of Relativity
The principle of relativity is foundational in modern physics. It postulates that the laws of physics are the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. This principle is a cornerstone of Einstein's theory of relativity and ensures that scientific laws have a consistent form in all inertial frames of reference.
In the context of the wave equation and transformations, this principle implies that the speed of light should be constant across all reference frames. The Galilean transformation fails this test, as it results in a distorted wave equation when moving to a new frame. In contrast, the Lorentz transformation preserves the wave equation's structure, thereby maintaining the consistency of the speed of light.
This consistency reinforces our understanding of how light behaves and supports the concept that the speed of light in a vacuum is the ultimate speed limit of the universe.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Inside a spaceship flying past the earth at three-fourths the speed of light, a pendulum is swinging. (a) If each swing takes 1.50 s as measured by an astronaut performing an experiment inside the spaceship, how long will the swing take as measured by a person at mission control on earth who is watching the experiment? (b) If each swing takes 1.50 s as measured by a person at mission control on earth, how long will it take as measured by the astronaut in the spaceship?

Measuring Speed by Radar. A baseball coach uses a radar device to measure the speed of an approaching pitched base-ball. This device sends out electromagnetic waves with frequency \(f_{0}\) and then measures the shift in frequency \(\Delta f\) of the waves reflected from the moving baseball. If the fractional frequency shift produced by a baseball is \(\Delta f / f_{0}=2.86 \times 10^{-7}\) , what is the baseball's speed in \(\mathrm{km} / \mathrm{h} ?\) (Hint: Are the waves Doppler- shifted a second time when reflected off the ball?

One of the wavelengths of light emitted by hydrogen atoms under normal laboratory conditions is \(\lambda=656.3 \mathrm{nm},\) in the red portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. In the light emitted from a distant galaxy this same spectral line is observed to be Doppler- shifted to \(\lambda=953.4 \mathrm{nm},\) in the infrared portion of the spectrum. How fast are the emitting atoms moving relative to the earth? Are they approaching the earth or receding from it?

Determining the Masses of Stars. Many of the stars in the sky are actually binary stars, in which two stars orbit about their common center of mass. If the orbital speeds of the stars are high enough, the motion of the stars can be detected by the Doppler shifts of the light they empler. Stars for which this is the case are called spectroscopic binary stars. Figure \(\mathrm{P3} 7.75\) shows the simplest case of a spectroscopic binary star: two identical stars, each with mass \(m,\) orbiting their center of mass in a circle of radius \(R\) . The plane of the stars' orbits is edge-on to the line of sight of an observer on the earth. (a) The light produced by heated hydrogen gas in a laboratory on the earth has a frequency of \(4.568110 \times\) \(10^{14}\) Hz. In the light received from the stars by a telescope on the earth, hydrogen light is observed to vary in frequency between \(4.567710 \times 10^{14} \mathrm{Hz}\) and \(4.568910 \times 10^{14} \mathrm{Hz}\) . Determine whether the binary star system as a whole is moving toward or away from the earth, the speed of this motion, and the orbital speeds of the stars. Hint: The speeds involved are much less than \(c,\) so you may use the approximate result \(\Delta f / f=u / c\) given in Section 37.6 . (b) The light from each star in the binary system varies from its maximum frequency to its minimum frequency and back again in 11.0 days. Determine the orbital radius \(R\) and the mass \(m\) of each star. Give your answer for \(m\) in kilograms and as a multiple of the mass of the sun, \(1.99 \times 10^{30}\) kg. Compare the value of \(R\) to the distance from the earth to the sun, \(1.50 \times 10^{11}\) m. (This technique is actually used in astronomy to determine the masses of stars. In practice, the problem is more complicated because the two stars in a binary system are usually not identical, the orbits are usually not circular, and the plane of the orbits is usually tilted with respect to the line of sight from the earth.)

A rocket ship flies past the earth at 85.0\(\%\) of the speed of light. Inside, an astronaut who is undergoing a physical examination is having his height measured while he is lying down parallel to the direction the rocket ship is moving. (a) If his height is measured to be 2.00 \(\mathrm{m}\) by his doctor inside the ship, what height would a person watching this from earth measure for his height? (b) If the earth-based person had measured \(2.00 \mathrm{m},\) what would the doctor in the spaceship have measured for the astronaut's height? Is this a reasonable height? (c) Suppose the astronaut in part (a) gets upafter the examination and stands with his body perpendicular to the direction of motion. What would the doctor in the rocket and the observer on earth measure for his height now?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.