/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 (a) What is the wavelength of li... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(a) What is the wavelength of light that is deviated in the first order through an angle of \(13.5^{\circ}\) by a transmission grating having 5000 slits/cm? (b) What is the second order deviation of this wavelength? Assume normal incidence.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The wavelength is 466.89 nm. (b) The second order deviation angle is approximately 27.94°.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the problem

We need to find the wavelength of light that is deviated in the first order through an angle of \(13.5^{\circ}\) using a transmission grating with 5000 slits per cm. Additionally, we are asked to calculate the second order deviation angle for this wavelength.
02

Convert slits per cm into slit separation

The number of slits per cm is 5000, so the slit separation (distance between adjacent slits), denoted as \(d\), can be calculated by taking the reciprocal of the slits per cm. Thus, \(d = \frac{1}{5000} \text{ cm} = 2 \times 10^{-4} \text{ cm} = 2 \times 10^{-6} \text{ m}\).
03

Use the grating equation for first order deviation

For first-order diffraction (\(n=1\)), we use the grating equation: \( d \sin \theta = n \lambda \), where \(\theta\) is the deviation angle, and \(n\) is the order. Substitute \(d = 2 \times 10^{-6} \text{ m}\) and \(\theta = 13.5^{\circ}\). Solving for \(\lambda\), we have \(\lambda = \frac{d \sin \theta}{n} = \frac{2 \times 10^{-6} \sin(13.5^{\circ})}{1}\).
04

Calculate the wavelength

Using the values provided, calculate \(\lambda: \lambda = 2 \times 10^{-6} \times \sin(13.5^{\circ}) = 2 \times 10^{-6} \times 0.233445 = 4.6689 \times 10^{-7} \text{ m} = 466.89 \text{ nm}\).
05

Find the second order deviation

We need to find the deviation angle for the second order (\(n=2\)) using the same wavelength \(\lambda = 4.6689 \times 10^{-7} \text{ m}\). Again use the grating equation \(d \sin \theta = n \lambda\), and solve for \(\theta\): \(\theta = \sin^{-1}\left( \frac{n \lambda}{d} \right) = \sin^{-1}\left( \frac{2 \times 4.6689 \times 10^{-7}}{2 \times 10^{-6}} \right)\).
06

Calculate the second order deviation angle

Substituting the values gives us \(\theta = \sin^{-1}\left(0.46734\right)\), which results in \(\theta \approx 27.94^{\circ}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Wavelength Calculation
To find the wavelength of light that gets deviated through a grating, we first need to understand what a diffraction grating is. It consists of multiple slits closely positioned together that break up light into various angles. These angles are related to the wavelength of light. In this context, you need to know two things:
  • The angle at which the light deviates, which is given as \(13.5^{\circ}\), and
  • The number of slits per centimeter, here it is 5000.
From the number of slits, we calculate the slit separation \(d\), which is the inverse of the number of slits. Thus, \(d = \frac{1}{5000}\, \text{cm} = 2 \times 10^{-4}\, \text{cm}\). Changing units for consistency, this becomes \(2 \times 10^{-6}\, \text{m}\). Now we use this distance to unravel the wavelength using the grating equation, aiming for clarity in combining physics and algebra.
Grating Equation
The grating equation is a central concept when dealing with diffraction gratings. This equation is expressed as \(d \cdot \sin \theta = n \cdot \lambda\), where:
  • \(d\) is the separation between slits,
  • \(\theta\) is the angle of deviation,
  • \(n\) is the order of diffraction, and
  • \(\lambda\) is the wavelength of light.
In this scenario, for the first order of diffraction \((n=1)\), and with \(\theta = 13.5^{\circ}\), the task is to solve for \(\lambda\). That's done using the rearranged formula \(\lambda = \frac{d \cdot \sin \theta}{n}\). Substituting \(d = 2 \times 10^{-6}\, \text{m}\) and \(\theta = 13.5^{\circ}\), the wavelength becomes \(\lambda = 4.6689 \times 10^{-7}\, \text{m}\) or \(466.89\, \text{nm}\). This equation opens the doorway to understanding how light's wavelength relates to its angle of deflection.
Order of Diffraction
The order of diffraction \((n)\) describes how many full wavelengths separate the light paths. Each order corresponds to an angle where light consistently diffracts through the grating. For the first order, we already calculated a deviation angle using the given conditions. Now, moving to the second order \((n=2)\), the angle will evidently change due to light needing to cover an additional full wavelength.
  • We solve the grating equation again: \(d \cdot \sin \theta = n \cdot \lambda\).
  • With \(\lambda = 4.6689 \times 10^{-7}\, \text{m}\) from the first calculation.
  • Solving for \(\theta\) in second order, it is determined by \(\theta = \sin^{-1}\left( \frac{2 \cdot 4.6689 \times 10^{-7}}{2 \times 10^{-6}} \right)\).
  • After computation, this yields approximately \(27.94^{\circ}\).
Understanding different orders of diffraction is crucial for exploring how light behaves when passed through a diffraction grating, particularly in scientific and technological applications where precise light measurements are needed.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Light of wavelength 585 nm falls on a slit 0.0666 \(\mathrm{mm}\) wide. (a) On a very large and distant screen, how many totally dark fringes (indicating complete cancellation) will there be, including both sides of the central bright spot? Solve this problem without calculating all the angles! (Hint: What is the largest that sin \(\theta\) can be? What does this tell you is the largest that \(m\) can be? (b) At what angle will the dark fringe that is most distant from the central bright fringe occur?

Monochromatic light of wavelength 486 \(\mathrm{nm}\) from a distant source passes through a slit that is 0.0290 \(\mathrm{mm}\) wide. In the resulting diffraction pattern, the intensity at the center of the central maximum \(\left(\theta=0^{\circ}\right)\) is \(4.00 \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} .\) What is the intensity at a point on the screen that corresponds to \(\theta=1.20^{\circ} .\)

A series of parallel linear water wave fronts are traveling directly toward the shore at 15.0 \(\mathrm{cm} / \mathrm{s}\) on an otherwise placid lake. A long concrete barrier that runs parallel to the shore at a distance of 3.20 \(\mathrm{m}\) away has a hole in it. You count the wave crests and observe that 75.0 of them pass by each minute, and you also observe that no waves reach the shore at \(\pm 61.3 \mathrm{cm}\) from the point directly opposite the hole, but waves do reach the shore every- where within this distance. (a) How wide is the hole in the barrier? (b) At what other angles do you find no waves hitting the shore?

Laser light of wavelength 500.0 nm illuminates two identical slits, producing an interference pattern on a screen 90.0 \(\mathrm{cm}\) from the slits. The bright bands are 1.00 \(\mathrm{cm}\) apart, and the third bright bands on either side of the central maximum are missing in the pattern. Find the width and the separation of the two slits.

An interference pattern is produced by light of wave- length 580 \(\mathrm{nm}\) from a distant source incident on two identical parallel slits separated by a distance (between centers) of 0.530 \(\mathrm{mm}\) . (a) If the slits are very narrow, what would be the angular positions of the first-order and second- order, two-slit, interference maxima? (b) Let the slits have width 0.320 \(\mathrm{mm}\) . In terms of the intensity \(I_{0}\) at the center of the central maximum, what is the intensity at each of the angular positions in part (a)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.