/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 48 A \(0.100-\mu g\) speck of dust ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A \(0.100-\mu g\) speck of dust is accelerated from rest to a speed of 0.900\(c\) by a constant \(1.00 \times 10^{6} \mathrm{N}\) force. (a) If the nonrelativistic form of Newton's second law \((\Sigma F=m a)\) is used, how far does-the object travel to reach its final speed? (b) Using the correct relativistic treatment of Section 37.8 , how far does the object travel to reach its final speed? (c) Which distance is greater? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) 1.215 x 10^7 m; (b) 4.96 x 10^6 m; (c) Nonrelativistic is greater due to no relativistic inertia increase.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate acceleration using nonrelativistic Newton's second law

First, convert the mass of the dust speck from micrograms to kilograms: \(0.100 \mu g = 0.100 \times 10^{-6}g = 0.100 \times 10^{-9} kg\). Using \(F = ma\), solve for the acceleration \(a\):\(a = \frac{F}{m} = \frac{1.00 \times 10^6 \text{ N}}{0.100 \times 10^{-9} \text{ kg}} = 1.00 \times 10^{16} \text{ m/s}^2\).
02

Calculate nonrelativistic distance to reach final speed

Use the formula for distance with constant acceleration, \(d = \frac{v^2}{2a}\), where \(v = 0.900c\) and \(c = 3.00 \times 10^8 \text{ m/s}\). Substitute \(v\) and \(a\) to find \(d\): \(d = \frac{(0.900 \times 3.00 \times 10^8)^2}{2 \times 1.00 \times 10^{16}} = 1.215 \times 10^7 \text{ m}\).
03

Calculate the relativistic acceleration

Use the relativistic force relation \(F = \frac{dp}{dt}\), where \(p = \gamma mv\) is the relativistic momentum, \(\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}\). The differentiation of \(p\) with respect to time gives \(a_{rel} = \frac{F}{\gamma^3 m}\). Substitute the mass, \(F\), and find \(\gamma\) at \(v = 0.900c\), \(\gamma = 2.294\).
04

Calculate relativistic distance to reach final speed

Use the relativistic result for distance \(d = \frac{mc^2}{F} \left(\gamma - 1\right)\). Substitute values: \(m = 0.100 \times 10^{-9} \text{ kg}\), \(\gamma = 2.294\), \(F = 1.00 \times 10^{6} \text{ N}\), and \(c = 3.00 \times 10^8 \text{ m/s}\) to find \(d\): \(d = \frac{0.100 \times 10^{-9} \times (3.00 \times 10^8)^2}{1.00 \times 10^6} (2.294 - 1) = 4.96 \times 10^6 \text{ m}\).
05

Compare the distances

Compare the results from the nonrelativistic and relativistic calculations. The nonrelativistic distance \(d = 1.215 \times 10^7 \text{ m}\) is greater than the relativistic distance \(d = 4.96 \times 10^6 \text{ m}\). In the relativistic case, the increasing inertia slows down the acceleration process, leading to a smaller distance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Newton's Second Law
Newton's second law is a cornerstone of classical physics. It states that the force \( F \) acting on an object is equal to the mass \( m \) of the object multiplied by its acceleration \( a \) (i.e., \( F = ma \)). This fundamental principle explains how an object's motion changes when subjected to a force.
In the context of the exercise, using this law in a nonrelativistic framework, we calculated the acceleration experienced by a tiny speck of dust. By applying the force of \( 1.00 \times 10^6 \) N to the speck with a mass of \( 0.100 \times 10^{-9} \) kg, we found that it experiences an enormous acceleration, \( a = 1.00 \times 10^{16} \) m/s².
However, this approach assumes that the acceleration can increase indefinitely, which isn't the case at velocities approaching the speed of light.
Relativistic Momentum
As objects approach the speed of light, they no longer obey the classic momentum equation \( p = mv \). Instead, relativistic momentum must be considered, incorporating the Lorentz factor \( \gamma \), where \( p = \gamma mv \) and \( \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}} \). This is crucial for high-speed scenarios.
In our exercise, when the speck's speed approaches \( 0.900c \), the Lorentz factor becomes significant, affecting its momentum. At this speed, the Lorentz factor \( \gamma \) was calculated to be approximately 2.294, showing how the momentum increases non-linearly with velocity.
Relativistic momentum ensures that even as more force is applied, the object cannot accelerate indefinitely, reflecting the increase in inertial resistance.
Relativistic Acceleration
With relativistic speeds, acceleration also deviates from classical predictions. Instead of simply \( a = \frac{F}{m} \), it becomes \( a_{rel} = \frac{F}{\gamma^3 m} \), due to the dependency on the object's velocity through the Lorentz factor. This insight changes how we perceive movement at high speeds.
In this exercise, the relativistic treatment required us to determine \( \gamma \) to correctly compute acceleration. The increased inertia, evident from the factor \( \gamma^3\), dramatically reduces the acceleration as the particle's speed approaches \( c \). This means that the more force applied, the more significantly \( \gamma^3\) impacts the acceleration, thus slowing down the particle much more than expected classically.
Constant Force Dynamics
Applying a constant force to an object results in different outcomes, depending on whether classical or relativistic physics are considered. As observed, under classical physics, the speck should travel farther due to constant acceleration. However, relativistically speaking, the same force applied sees diminishing returns on acceleration at higher speeds.
For this problem, interpreting the dynamics of constant force led to differing travel distances—roughly \( 1.215 \times 10^7 \) m for the classical approach and \( 4.96 \times 10^6 \) m when incorporating relativity.
This contrast arises because, in relativistic terms, as objects gain speed, their effective inertia increases, diminishing the effect of constant force on additional acceleration and thus reducing total travel distance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How fast must a rocket travel relative to the earth so that time in the rocket "slows down" to half its rate as measured by earth-based observers? Do present-day jet planes approach such speeds?

(a) How much work must be done on a particle with mass \(m\) to accelerate it (a) from rest to a speed of 0.090\(c\) and (b) from a speed of 0.900\(c\) to a speed of 0.990\(c ?\) (Express the answers in terms of \(m c^{2}-)(c)\) How do your answers in parts \((a)\) and \((b)\) compare?

Many of the stars in the sky are actually binary stars, in which two stars orbit about their common center of mass. If the orbital speeds of the stars are high enough, the motion of the stars can be detected by the Doppler shifts of the light they emit. Stars for which this is the case are called spectruscopic binary stars. Figure 37.30 (next page) shows the simplest case of a spectroscopic binary star: two identical stars, each with mass \(m,\) orbiting their center of mass in a circle of radius \(R\) . The plane of the stars' orbits is edge-on to the line of sight of an observer on the earth. (a) The light produced by heated hydrogen gas in a laboratory on the earth has a frequency of \(4.568110 \times 10^{14} \mathrm{Hz}\) . In the light received from the stars by a tele- scope on the earth, hydrogen light is observed to vary in frequency between \(4.567710 \times 10^{14} \mathrm{Hz}\) and \(4.568910 \times 10^{14} \mathrm{Hz}\) . Determine whether the binary star system as a whole is moving toward or away from the earth, the speed of this motion, and the orbital speeds of the stars. (Hint: The speeds involved are much less than \(c,\) so you may use the approximate result \(\Delta f|f=u| c\) given in Section \(37.6 . )\) (b) The light from each star in the binary system varies from its maximum frequency to its minimum frequency and back again in 11.0 days. Determine the orbital radius \(R\) and the mass \(m\) of each star. Give your answer for \(m\) in kilograms and as a multiple of the mass of the sun, \(1.99 \times 10^{30} \mathrm{kg}\) . Compare the value of \(R\) to the distance from the earth to the sun, \(1.50 \times 10^{11} \mathrm{m}\) . (This technique is actually used in astronomy to determine the masses of stars. In practice, the problem is more complicated because the two stars in a binary system are usually not identical, the orbits are usually not circular, and the plane of the orbits is usually tilted with respect to the line of sight from the earth.)

Muons are unstable subatomic particles that decay to electrons with a mean lifetime of 2.2\(\mu s\) . They are produced when cosmic rays bombard the upper atmosphere about 10 \(\mathrm{km}\) above the earth's surface, and they travel very close to the speed of light. The problem we want to address is why we see any of them at the earth's surface. (a) What is the greatest distance a muon could travel during its 2.2 -\mus lifetime? (b) According to your answer in part (a), it would seem that muons could never make it to the ground. But the \(2.2-\mu\) s lifetime is measured in the frame of the muon, and muons are moving very fast. At a speed of 0.999 \(\mathrm{c}\) . What is the mean lifetime of a muon as measured by an observer at rest on the earth? How far would the muon travel in this time? Does this result explain why we find muons in cosmic rays? (c) From the point of view of the muon, it still lives for only 2.2 , \(\mu\) s, so how does it make it to the ground? What is the thickness of the 10 \(\mathrm{km}\) of atmosphere through which the muon must travel, as measured by the muon? It is now clear how the muon is able to reach the ground?

Frame \(S^{\prime}\) has an \(x\) -component of velocity \(u\) relative to frame S, and at \(t=t^{\prime}=0\) the two frames coincide (see Fig. 37.3\()\) . A light pulse with a spherical wave front is emitted at the origin of \(S^{\prime}\) at time \(t^{\prime}=0 .\) Its distance \(x^{\prime}\) from the origin after a time \(t^{\prime}\) is given by \(x^{\prime 2}=c^{2} t^{\prime 2} .\) Use the Lorentz coordinate ransformation to S, and at \(t=t^{\prime}=0\) the two frames coincide (see Fig. 37.3\()\) . A light pulse with a spherical wave front is emitted at the origin of \(S^{\prime}\) at time \(t^{\prime}=0 .\) Its distance \(x^{\prime}\) from the origin after a time \(t^{\prime}\) is given by \(x^{\prime 2}=c^{2} t^{\prime 2} .\) Use the Lorentz coordinate ransformation to be spherical in both frames.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.