Chapter 39: Problem 7
Which of the following experiments proved the existence of the nucleus? a) the photoelectric effect b) the Millikan oil-drop experiment c) the Rutherford scattering experiment d) the Stern-Gerlach experiment
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 39: Problem 7
Which of the following experiments proved the existence of the nucleus? a) the photoelectric effect b) the Millikan oil-drop experiment c) the Rutherford scattering experiment d) the Stern-Gerlach experiment
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Draw a quark-level Feynman diagram for the decay of a neutral kaon into two charged pions, \(K^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}+\pi^{-}\).
Draw a Feynman diagram for an electron-proton scattering, \(e^{-}+p \rightarrow e^{-}+p\), mediated by photon exchange.
\( \mathrm{~A} 6.50-\mathrm{MeV}\) alpha particle is incident on a lead nucleus. Because of the Coulomb force between them, the alpha particle will approach the nucleus only to a minimum distance, \(r_{\text {min }}\) a) Determine \(r_{\text {min }}\). b) If the kinetic energy of the alpha particle is increased, will the particle's distance of approach increase, decrease, or remain the same? Explain.
The de Broglie wavelength, \(\lambda\), of a 5-MeV alpha particle is \(6.4 \mathrm{fm}\), as shown in this chapter, and the closest distance, \(r_{\text {min }}\), to the gold nucleus this alpha particle can get is \(45.5 \mathrm{fm}\) (calculated in Example 39.1). Based on the fact that \(\lambda \ll r_{\text {min }}\), one can conclude that, for this Rutherford scattering experiment, it is adequate to treat the alpha particle as a a) particle. b) wave.
A free neutron decays into a proton and an electron (and an anti-neutrino). A free proton has never been observed to decay into anything. Why then do we consider the neutron to be as "fundamental" (at the nuclear level) a particle as the proton? Why do we not consider a neutron to be a proton-electron composite?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.