/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Show that Ampere's Law is not ne... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 31: Problem 14

Show that Ampere's Law is not necessarily consistent if the surface through which the flux is to be calculated is a closed surface, but that the Maxwell- Ampere Law always is. (Hence, Maxwell's introduction of his law of induction and the displacement current are not optional; they are logically necessary.) Show also that Faraday's Law of Induction does not suffer from this consistency problem.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Ampere's Law inconsistency occurs when the surface through which the flux is calculated is a closed surface because it does not account for the displacement current in changing electric fields. This can be seen in the charging capacitor example, where Ampere's Law implies there is no magnetic field when the closed loop is considered around the gap between the capacitor plates, despite the wire carrying a current. The introduction of Maxwell-Ampere Law, which includes the displacement current term, resolves this inconsistency.

Step by step solution

01

Ampere's Law

Ampere's Law can be written as: \(\oint_C \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0 I_{enc}\) where \(\oint_C \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l}\) is the magnetic field B integrated over a closed loop C, \(\mu_0\) is the permeability of free space, and \(I_{enc}\) is the total current passing through the surface enclosed by the loop.
02

Consider a charging capacitor

Let's consider the example of a charging capacitor with constant current I and a closed loop C around one of the connecting wires. In this case, Ampere's Law states the following: \(\oint_C \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0 I\) However, since the current in the wire is charging the capacitor plates, there is no current passing through the surface enclosed by the loop when the loop is considered around the gap between the capacitor plates. Thus, Ampere's Law implies: \(\oint_C \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = 0\) This creates a contradiction because the wire is carrying a current, but the loop with the gap between the capacitor plates is not carrying any current. Ampere's Law is not consistent in this case.
03

Maxwell-Ampere Law

The Maxwell-Ampere Law, which includes the displacement current term, is given by: \(\oint_C \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0 (I_{enc} + \epsilon_0\frac{d\Phi_E}{dt})\) where \(\epsilon_0\frac{d\Phi_E}{dt}\) is the displacement current term, and \(\Phi_E\) is the electric flux.
04

Apply Maxwell-Ampere Law to the charging capacitor

With the charging capacitor scenario, when the loop is around the gap between the capacitor plates, the displacement current term accounts for the changing electric field between the plates. The displacement current is given by: \(\epsilon_0\frac{d\Phi_E}{dt} = I\) Thus, the Maxwell-Ampere Law becomes consistent in this case: \(\oint_C \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{l} = \mu_0(I_{enc} + \epsilon_0\frac{d\Phi_E}{dt}) = \mu_0 I\)
05

Faraday's Law of Induction

Faraday's Law of Induction states that the electromotive force (EMF) induced in a closed loop equals the negative time rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop: \(\oint_C \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = -\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}\)
06

Faraday's Law consistency

Faraday's Law is consistent because it is based on the conservation of energy and does not suffer from any inconsistency problems like Ampere's Law. The induced electromotive force in a loop is directly proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux through that loop. The closed surface for calculating flux is not an issue in this case. In conclusion, we demonstrated that Ampere's Law is not necessarily consistent if the surface through which the flux is calculated is a closed surface. We also showed that Maxwell-Ampere Law addresses this issue, making it always consistent. Furthermore, we verified that Faraday's Law of Induction does not suffer from any consistency problems.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

.An industrial carbon dioxide laser produces a beam of radiation with average power of \(6.00 \mathrm{~kW}\) at a wavelength of \(10.6 \mu \mathrm{m}\). Such a laser can be used to cut steel up to \(25 \mathrm{~mm}\) thick. The laser light is polarized in the \(x\) -direction, travels in the positive \(z\) -direction, and is collimated (neither diverging or converging) at a constant diameter of \(100.0 \mu \mathrm{m} .\) Write the equations for the laser light's electric and magnetic fields as a function of time and of position \(z\) along the beam. Recall that \(\vec{E}\) and \(\vec{B}\) are vectors. Leave the overall phase unspecified, but be sure to check the relative phase between \(\vec{E}\) and \(\vec{B}\) .

A laser beam takes 50.0 ms to be reflected back from a totally reflecting sail on a spacecraft. How far away is the sail?

What is the wavelength of the electromagnetic waves used for cell phone communications in the 850 -MHz band?

Practically everyone who has studied the electromagnetic spectrum has wondered how the world would appear if we could see over a range of frequencies of the ten octaves over which we can hear rather than the less than one octave over which we can see. (An octave refers to a factor of 2 in frequency.) But this is fundamentally impossible. Why?

The most intense beam of light that can propagate through dry air must have an electric field whose maximum amplitude is no greater than the breakdown value for air: \(E_{\max }^{\operatorname{air}}=3.0 \cdot 10^{6} \mathrm{~V} / \mathrm{m},\) assuming that this value is unaffected by the frequency of the wave. a) Calculate the maximum amplitude the magnetic field of this wave can have. b) Calculate the intensity of this wave. c) What happens to a wave more intense than this?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

Electrostatics

Read Explanation

Measurements

Read Explanation

Electromagnetism

Read Explanation

Work Energy and Power

Read Explanation

Electric Charge Field and Potential

Read Explanation

Wave Optics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.