/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 $$ \psi_{h}(t, m)=-h m+q(t)+r(... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

$$ \psi_{h}(t, m)=-h m+q(t)+r(t) m^{2}+s(t) m^{4}+u(t) m^{6} $$ with \(u(t)\) a fixed positive constant. Minimize \(\psi\) with respect to the variable \(m\) and examine the spontaneous magnetization \(m_{0}\) as a function of the parameters \(r\) and \(s\). In particular, show the following: \({ }^{21}\) (a) For \(r>0\) and \(s>-(3 u r)^{1 / 2}, m_{0}=0\) is the only real solution. (b) For \(r>0\) and \(-(4 u r)^{1 / 2}0\) and \(s=-(4 u r)^{1 / 2}, m_{0}=0\) or \(\pm(r / u)^{1 / 4}\). Now, the minimum of \(\psi\) at \(m_{0}=0\) is of the same height as the ones at \(m_{0}=\pm(r / u)^{1 / 4}\), so a nonzero spontaneous magnetization is as likely to occur as the zero one. (d) For \(r>0\) and \(s<-(4 u r)^{1 / 2}, m_{0}=\pm m_{1}\) - which implies a first-order phase transition (because the two possible states available here differ by a finite amount in \(m\) ). The line \(s=-(4 u r)^{1 / 2}\), with \(r\) positive, is generally referred to as a "line of first-order phase transitions." (e) For \(r=0\) and \(s<0, m_{0}=\pm(2|s| / 3 u)^{1 / 2}\). (f) For \(r<0, m_{0}=\pm m_{1}\) for all \(s\). As \(r \rightarrow 0, m_{1} \rightarrow 0\) if \(s\) is positive. (g) For \(r=0\) and \(s>0, m_{0}=0\) is only solution. Combining this result with (f), we conclude that the line \(r=0\), with \(s\) positive, is a "line of second- order phase transitions," for the two states available here differ by a vanishing amount in \(m\). The lines of first-order phase transitions and second-order phase transitions meet at the point \((r=0, s=0)\), which is commonly referred to as a tricritical point (Griffiths, 1970).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The given polynomial expression \(\psi_{h}(t, m)\) represents the state of a system, where \(m\) stands for the spontaneous magnetization. The problem is asking for how this \(m\) changes with respect to parameters \(r\) and \(s\). The behaviour of \(m_{0}\) under several condition sets for \(r\) and \(s\) is derived and explained, and the implications in terms of phase transitions and spontaneous magnetization are discussed.

Step by step solution

01

Minimise \(\psi\) with respect to \(m\)

The function is minimum when its derivative is equal to zero. Hence, differentiate \(\psi_{h}(t, m)\) with respect to \(m\), equate it to zero and solve for \(m\) to find the solutions that minimize \(\psi_{h}(t, m)\). Note that \(m_{0}\) is the spontaneous magnetization i.e. the minimum of \(\psi\) with respect to \(m\).
02

Analyze for \(r>0\) and \(s>-(3 u r)^{1 / 2}\)

Substitute these conditions into the solutions obtained in Step 1 to obtain the specific solutions that satisfy these conditions and show that \(m_{0}=0\) is the only real solution.
03

Analyze for \(r>0\) and \(-(4 u r)^{1 / 2}

Substitute these conditions and show that \(m_{0}=0\) or \(\pm m_{1}\) are the solutions. Also, prove that the minimum of \(\psi\) at \(m_{0}=0\) is lower than the minima at \(m_{0}=\pm m_{1}\), so \(m_{0}\) should be 0.
04

Analyze for \(r>0\) and \(s=-(4 u r)^{1 / 2}\)

Repeat the analysis of Step 3 for these specific conditions to show that \(m_{0}=0\) or \(\pm(r / u)^{1 / 4}\). Also, prove that the minimum of \(\psi\) at \(m_{0}=0\) is as likely to occur as the non-zero ones.
05

Continue the analysis for remaining conditions

Continue substituting the conditions as given in the problem to solve for \(m_{0}\) for all the respective cases as in the earlier steps.
06

Understand the phase transition implications

Understand and explain the implications of these solutions, in terms of physical concepts such as first and second order phase transitions and the concept of a tricritical point.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Spontaneous Magnetization
Spontaneous magnetization is a concept in physics where a material, like a ferromagnet, becomes magnetized without an external magnetic field. This happens because of the alignment of individual magnetic moments in the material due to thermal agitation reducing at lower temperatures. In the context of the minimization function described, spontaneous magnetization is represented by the variable \( m_0 \), which is found at the minimum of the potential \( \psi_h(t, m) \).
If \( m_0 = 0 \), the system is in its unmagnetized state. If \( m_0 eq 0 \), spontaneous magnetization occurs, indicating that the system has adopted a stable alignment of magnetic moments even in the absence of an external field. This can be dependent on parameters such as \( r \) and \( s \) as shown in different regions of the phase diagram.
Here, we note the importance of these parameters, as they not only define whether spontaneous magnetization occurs, but also help to understand the behavior of the system near critical regions.
First-order Phase Transition
A first-order phase transition involves a sudden change in physical properties, such as density or magnetization, during the transition between phases. In this discussion, it happens when the parameter conditions like \( r > 0 \) and \( s < -(4ur)^{1/2} \) lead to solutions of \( m_0 = \pm m_1 \). This indicates a significant change in magnetization (\( m \)) without gradual transformation.
The system jumping between states indicates a discontinuity in the order parameter, in this case, the magnetization, which corresponds with the importance of \( m \). During this transition, properties like latent heat can be observed, as the material absorbs or releases energy to rearrange the magnetic moments.
Such transitions tend to have a clear boundary or line in the phase diagram, known as the line of first-order phase transitions. This behavior shows the sharp distinction between different states of the system under certain conditions.
Second-order Phase Transition
Unlike first-order transitions, second-order phase transitions occur more smoothly, without drastic changes like latent heat. These transitions are marked by a continuous change in the order parameter, magnetization here, identified by the conditions where \( r = 0 \) and \( s > 0 \). This means the system's properties vary softly across the transition.
In these conditions, the magnetic moments align gradually, causing the magnetization \( m_0 \) to change more continuously as opposed to a sudden flip. Hence, the solutions show \( m_0 = 0 \) is the sole possibility, indicating the system smoothly traverses from one phase to another as temperature changes.
Second-order transitions are critical for understanding phenomena like critical points, where critical fluctuations occur. Such transitions are characterized by parameters that shift the system's balance softly, often graphed without a visible phase boundary.
Tricritical Point
A tricritical point represents a unique location on a phase diagram where lines of first-order and second-order phase transitions converge. At the point where \( r = 0 \) and \( s = 0 \), both types of transitions might be observed, granting distinct critical behaviors.
The presence of a tricritical point indicates an overlap where both the discontinuous and continuous transitions can coexist, proving essential for theoretical physics in mapping complex phase diagrams. This point helps in defining regions of stability and instability among different phases.
Understanding the tricritical point is vital because it offers insights into phenomena where a slight modification in parameters can shift the nature of a transition. As such, it represents a crossover between different phases and their distinct types of transitions, simplifying the transition landscape for both theoreticians and experimental observers.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a two-component solution of \(N_{A}\) atoms of type \(A\) and \(N_{B}\) atoms of type \(B\), which are supposed to be randomly distributed over \(N\left(=N_{A}+N_{B}\right)\) sites of a single lattice. Denoting the energies of the nearest-neighbor pairs \(A A, B B\), and \(A B\) by \(\varepsilon_{11}, \varepsilon_{22}\), and \(\varepsilon_{12}\), respectively, write down the free energy of the system in the Bragg-Williams approximation and evaluate the chemical potentials \(\mu_{A}\) and \(\mu_{B}\) of the two components. Next, show that if \(\varepsilon=\left(\varepsilon_{11}+\varepsilon_{22}-2 \varepsilon_{12}\right)<0\), that is, if the atoms of the same species display greater affinity to be neighborly, then for temperatures below a critical temperature \(T_{c}\), which is given by the expression \(q|\varepsilon| / 2 k\), the solution separates out into two phases of unequal relative concentrations. [Note: For a study of phase separation in an isotopic mixture of hard-sphere bosons and fermions, and for the relevance of this study to the actual behavior of \(\mathrm{He}^{3}-\mathrm{He}^{4}\) solutions, see Cohen and van Leeuwen \((1960,1961)\).]

Consider a fluid near its critical point, with isotherms as sketched in Figure \(12.3\). Assume that the singular part of the Gibbs free energy of the fluid is of the form $$ G^{(s)}(T, P) \sim|t|^{2-\alpha} g\left(\pi /|t|^{\Delta}\right), $$ where \(\pi=\left(P-P_{c}\right) / P_{c}, t=\left(T-T_{c}\right) / T_{c}\) while \(g(x)\) is a universal function, with branches \(g_{+}\)for \(t>0\) and \(g_{-}\)for \(t<0\); in the latter case, the function \(g_{-}\)has a point of infinite curvature at a value of \(\pi\) that varies smoothly with \(t\), such that \(\pi(0)=0\) and \((\partial \pi / \partial t)_{t \rightarrow 0}=\) const. (a) Using the above expression for \(G^{(s)}\), determine the manner in which the densities, \(\rho_{l}\) and \(\rho_{g}\), of the two phases approach one another as \(t \rightarrow 0\) from below. (b) Also determine how \(\left(P-P_{c}\right)\) varies with \(\left(\rho-\rho_{c}\right)\) as the critical point is approached along the critical isotherm \((t=0)\). (c) Examine as well the critical behavior of the isothermal compressibility \(\kappa_{T}\), the adiabatic compressibility \(\kappa_{S}\), the specific heats \(C_{P}\) and \(C_{V}\), the coefficient of volume expansion \(\alpha_{P}\), and the latent heat of vaporization \(l\).

A function \(f(x)\) is said to be concave over an interval \((a, b)\) if it satisfies the property $$ f\left\\{\lambda x_{1}+(1-\lambda) x_{2}\right\\} \geq \lambda f\left(x_{1}\right)+(1-\lambda) f\left(x_{2}\right), $$ where \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) are two arbitrary points in the interval \((a, b)\) while \(\lambda\) is a positive number in the interval \((0,1)\). This means that the chord joining the points \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) lies below the curve \(f(x)\). Show that this also means that the tangent to the curve \(f(x)\) at any point \(x\) in the interval \((a, b)\) lies above the curve \(f(x)\) or, equivalently, that the second derivative \(\partial^{2} f / \partial x^{2}\) throughout this interval \(\leq 0\).

In view of the thermodynamic relationship $$ C_{V}=T V\left(\partial^{2} P / \partial T^{2}\right)_{V}-T N\left(\partial^{2} \mu / \partial T^{2}\right)_{V} $$ for a fluid, \(\mu\) being the chemical potential of the system, Yang and Yang (1964) pointed out that, if \(C_{V}\) is singular at \(T=T_{c}\), then either \(\left(\partial^{2} P / \partial T^{2}\right)_{V}\) or \(\left(\partial^{2} \mu / \partial T^{2}\right)_{V}\) or both will be singular. Define an exponent \(\Theta\) by writing $$ \left(\partial^{2} P / \partial T^{2}\right)_{V} \sim\left(T_{c}-T\right)^{-\Theta} \quad\left(T \lesssim T_{c}\right) $$ and show that (Griffiths, 1965b) $$ \Theta \leq \alpha^{\prime}+\beta \quad \text { and } \quad \Theta \leq\left(2+\alpha^{\prime} \delta\right) /(\delta+1) $$

Study the spontaneous magnetization of the Heisenberg model in the mean field approximation and examine the dependence of \(\bar{L}_{0}\) on \(T\) (i) in the neighborhood of the critical temperature where ( \(\left.1-T / T_{c}\right) \ll 1\), and (ii) at sufficiently low temperatures where \(T / T_{c} \ll 1\). Compare these results with the corresponding ones, namely (12.5.14) and (12.5.15) for the Ising model. [In this connection, it may be pointed out that, at very low temperatures, the experimental data do not agree with the theoretical formula derived here. We find instead a much better agreement with the formula \(\bar{L}_{0}=\left\\{1-A(k T / J)^{3 / 2}\right\\}\), where \(A\) is a numerical constant (equal to \(0.1174\) in the case of a simple cubic lattice). This formula is known as Bloch's \(T^{3 / 2}-\mathrm{law}\) and is derivable from the spin-wave theory of ferromagnetism; see Wannier (1966), Section 15.5.]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.