/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 (III) In a double-slit experimen... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(III) In a double-slit experiment on electrons (or photons), suppose that we use indicators to determine which slit each electron went through (Section \(38-2\) ). These indicators must tell us the \(y\) coordinate to within \(d / 2,\) where \(d\) is the distance between slits. Use the uncertainty principle to show that the interference pattern will be destroyed. [Note: First show that the angle \(\theta\) between maxima and minima of the interference pattern is given by \(\frac{1}{2} \lambda / d\),

Short Answer

Expert verified
The uncertainty in position destructively impacts the interference pattern by significantly altering the electron paths.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Setup

In a double-slit experiment, we have two slits separated by a distance \(d\). Electrons (or photons) pass through these slits, creating an interference pattern on a screen. We want to determine which slit each particle goes through using indicators.
02

Applying the Position Uncertainty

According to the problem, the indicators provide the \(y\)-coordinate to within \(d/2\). This means there is an uncertainty in the position \(\Delta y = d/2\).
03

Defining the Uncertainty Principle

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that \(\Delta y \Delta p_y \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}\), where \(\Delta p_y\) is the uncertainty in momentum along the \(y\)-axis, and \(\hbar\) is the reduced Planck's constant.
04

Calculating Momentum Uncertainty

Using the uncertainty in position, we can find the minimum uncertainty in momentum: \(\Delta p_y \geq \frac{\hbar}{d}\). This introduces a variation in transverse momentum.
05

Impact on Interference Pattern

The change in momentum \(\Delta p_y\) leads to a variation in angle \(\theta\) for the path of electrons, affecting the interference condition. If \(\theta\) changes significantly, the interference pattern will be destroyed.
06

Maximizing the Angular Variation

The angle between maxima and minima in the interference pattern is \(\theta = \frac{1}{2} \frac{\lambda}{d}\), where \(\lambda\) is the wavelength. The introduced uncertainty leads to a spread in observed angles, larger than this separation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a fundamental theory in quantum mechanics that describes a limit on the precision with which the position and momentum of a particle can be known simultaneously. This principle can be expressed mathematically as:\[\Delta y \Delta p_y \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}\]Here, \( \Delta y \) represents the uncertainty in position along the \( y \)-axis, and \( \Delta p_y \) represents the uncertainty in momentum along the same axis.
This principle highlights the intrinsic limitation in measuring the properties of quantum particles, such as electrons or photons. When we try to pinpoint an electron passing through one of two slits with a precision of \( d/2 \), we increase the momentum uncertainty. As a result, there is a crucial trade-off: the more precisely we determine the particle's position, the less precisely we can know its momentum.
Understanding this principle is key to comprehending why certain classical intuitions fail in the quantum world. The endeavor to observe which slit the particle passes through introduces uncertainties significant enough to alter any formed patterns, like the interference pattern discussed in the double-slit experiment.
Interference Pattern
An interference pattern arises when waves overlap, such as the light waves or electron waves in a double-slit experiment. These patterns are characterized by alternating bright and dark bands, known as maxima and minima, respectively.
In the double-slit experiment, particles such as electrons or photons create an interference pattern when not observed individually. As they pass through the slits, they interfere constructively at some points and destructively at others.
  • Constructive Interference: Occurs when waves in phase combine to produce brighter bands (maxima).
  • Destructive Interference: Occurs when waves out of phase cancel each other, resulting in darker areas (minima).
However, introducing a measurement to determine the path the particle takes, such as identifying which slit it passes through, disturbs the system. By the uncertainty principle, measuring the particle's path adds enough momentum uncertainty to smear out the interference pattern. So in trying to "catch" the particle, the very act of measurement impacts the outcome, leading to a loss of the distinct interference pattern.
Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Mechanics is the fundamental theory of nature at the smallest scales, such as atoms and subatomic particles. It describes the bizarre and non-intuitive behavior of particles in a way that classical physics cannot.
A major aspect of quantum mechanics is the idea of wave-particle duality, where particles like electrons exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties. This duality is most famously demonstrated in the double-slit experiment, where particles behave as waves until measured as particles.
Another crucial element is the probability wave, or wave function, which presents the probabilities of finding a particle in various places and with different momenta. When not being measured, particles exist in superpositions of states, meaning they hold multiple probabilities at once.
  • Superposition: Particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously.
  • Wave Function Collapse: When a measurement is made, the wave function collapses to a single state.
  • Quantum Entanglement: Particles can become entangled, so the state of one instantly influences another.
Quantum mechanics challenges our traditional views of reality, showing that observation itself impacts the physical state of what is being observed. This is vividly illustrated in experiments like the double-slit experiment, pointing out the role of the observer in the quantum world.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(II) A potential barrier has a height \(U_{0}=14 \mathrm{eV}\) and thickness \(\ell=0.85 \mathrm{nm}\) . If the transmission coefficient for an incident electron is \(0.00050,\) what is the electron's energy?

(III) Consider a particle of mass \(m\) and energy \(E\) traveling to the right where it encounters a narrow potential barrier of height \(U_{0}\) and width \(\ell\) as shown in Fig. \(38-21 .\) It can be shown that: (i) for \(EU_{0},\) the transmission probability is $$ T=\left[1+\frac{\sin ^{2}\left(G^{\prime} \ell\right)}{4\left(E / U_{0}\right)\left(E / U_{0}-1\right)}\right]^{-1} $$ where $$ G^{\prime}=\sqrt{\frac{2 m\left(E-U_{0}\right)}{\hbar^{2}}} $$ and \(R=1-T .\) Consider that the particle is an electron and it is incident on a rectangular barrier of height \(U_{0}=10 \mathrm{eV}\) and width \(\ell=1.0 \times 10^{-10} \mathrm{~m} .\) ( \(a\) ) Calculate \(T\) and \(R\) for the electron from \(E / U_{0}=0\) to \(10,\) in steps of \(0.1 .\) Make a single graph showing the two curves of \(T\) and \(R\) as a function of \(E / U_{0}\). (b) From the graph determine the energies \(\left(E / U_{0}\right)\) at which the electron will have transmission probabilities of \(10 \%\) $$ 20 \%, 50 \%, \text { and } 80 \% $$

Consider a particle that can exist anywhere in space with a wave function given by \(\psi(x)=b^{-\frac{1}{2}}|x / b|^{\frac{1}{2}} e^{-(x / b)^{2} / 2},\) where \(b=1.0 \mathrm{nm} .\) (a) Check that the wave function is normalized. (b) What is the most probable position for the particle in the region \(x>0 ?\) (c) What is the probability of finding the particle between \(x=0 \mathrm{nm}\) and \(x=0.50 \mathrm{nm} ?\)

By how much does the tunneling current through the tip of an STM change if the tip rises 0.020 nm from some initial height above a sodium surface with a work function \(W_{0}=2.28 \mathrm{cV}\) ? [Hint: Let the work function equal the energy needed to raise the electron to the top of the barrier.

(I) Write the wave function for \((a)\) a free electron and (b) a free proton, each having a constant velocity \(v=3.0 \times 10^{5} \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.