/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 Find, by explicit construction u... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Find, by explicit construction using Pauli matrices, the eigenvalues for the Hamiltonian \\[ H=-\frac{2 \mu}{\hbar} \mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{B} \\] for a spin \(\frac{1}{2}\) particle in the presence of a magnetic field \(\mathbf{B}=B_{x} \hat{\mathbf{x}}+B_{y} \hat{\mathbf{y}}+B_{z} \mathbf{z}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The eigenvalues are \( \pm \mu B \).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Hamiltonian

The given Hamiltonian is \( H = -\frac{2 \mu}{\hbar} \mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{B} \). Here, \( \mathbf{S} \) is the spin operator expressed as \( \mathbf{S} = \frac{\hbar}{2} \mathbf{\sigma} \), where \( \mathbf{\sigma} \) are Pauli matrices. Substituting for \( \mathbf{S} \), we have \( H = -\mu \mathbf{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{B} \).
02

Using Pauli Matrices

The Pauli matrices are given by: \[ \sigma_{x} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \sigma_{y} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \ i & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \sigma_{z} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} \] Thus, the dot product \( \mathbf{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{B} \) becomes: \[ \sigma_{x}B_{x} + \sigma_{y}B_{y} + \sigma_{z}B_{z} \] which is: \[ \begin{pmatrix} B_{z} & B_{x} - iB_{y} \ B_{x} + iB_{y} & -B_{z} \end{pmatrix} \]
03

Constructing the Hamiltonian Matrix

The Hamiltonian, substituting the dot product result, becomes: \[ H = -\mu \begin{pmatrix} B_{z} & B_{x} - iB_{y} \ B_{x} + iB_{y} & -B_{z} \end{pmatrix} \]
04

Finding the Eigenvalues

To find the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian matrix, solve the characteristic equation: \[ \det(H - \lambda I) = 0 \] Substituting \( H \), \[ \det \left( -\mu \begin{pmatrix} B_{z} & B_{x} - iB_{y} \ B_{x} + iB_{y} & -B_{z} \end{pmatrix} - \lambda \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \right) = 0 \] Solve: \[ \det \begin{pmatrix} -\mu B_{z} - \lambda & -\mu (B_{x} - iB_{y}) \ -\mu (B_{x} + iB_{y}) & \mu B_{z} - \lambda \end{pmatrix} = 0 \] Expanding the determinant, we have: \[ (-\mu B_{z} - \lambda)(\mu B_{z} - \lambda) - (\mu B_{x} - i \mu B_{y})(\mu B_{x} + i \mu B_{y}) = 0 \]
05

Simplifying and Solving

The above expression simplifies to: \[ \lambda^2 - \mu^2 (B_{x}^2 + B_{y}^2 + B_{z}^2) = 0 \] This is a quadratic in \( \lambda \): \[ \lambda^2 = \mu^2 B^2 \] The solutions are: \[ \lambda = \pm \mu B \] where \( B = \sqrt{B_{x}^2 + B_{y}^2 + B_{z}^2} \).
06

Conclusion

The eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian are \( \lambda = \pm \mu B \). These values represent the energy levels for the spin \( \frac{1}{2} \) particle.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Pauli Matrices
In quantum mechanics, Pauli matrices are essential for understanding the behavior of spin-1/2 particles. These are a set of three 2x2 complex matrices, which can be represented as \(\sigma_x\), \(\sigma_y\), and \(\sigma_z\).
  • The Pauli matrix \(\sigma_x\) looks like this: \[ \sigma_x = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \]
  • The Pauli matrix \(\sigma_y\) is: \[ \sigma_y = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \ i & 0 \end{pmatrix} \]
  • The Pauli matrix \(\sigma_z\) is: \[ \sigma_z = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} \]
These matrices represent spin in three-dimensional space and follow specific algebraic rules, such as \(\sigma_i^2 = I\) (the identity matrix) and \( \{\sigma_i, \sigma_j\} = 2\delta_{ij}I\), where \(\{,\}\) denotes the anticommutator.

Pauli matrices serve as the building blocks of quantum mechanics when it comes to systems involving electron spin. When combined with the magnetic field through a dot product, these matrices help form the Hamiltonian operator, which describes the energy levels of a quantum system.
Spin-1/2 Particles
Spin-1/2 particles, such as electrons, are fundamental particles that possess intrinsic angular momentum characterized by 'spin'. Spin is a key quantum property that does not have a classical equivalent. For Spin-1/2 particles, the spin takes values of either \(+\frac{1}{2}\) or \(-\frac{1}{2}\).

This concept is vital since the Pauli exclusion principle relies on spin properties. In the presence of an external magnetic field, a particle's spin determines how it interacts with the field. Typically described by Pauli matrices, the spin operator \(\mathbf{S}\) for a spin-1/2 particle can be written as:
  • \(\mathbf{S} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\mathbf{\sigma}\)
The quantum behavior of spin-1/2 particles is critical for understanding phenomena such as magnetism, quantum computing, and the structure of atomic and subatomic particles. Their quantum nature allows them to exist in superpositions, creating potential for applications in various advanced technologies.
Hamiltonian Eigenvalues
The Hamiltonian in a quantum system is a critical operator that symbolizes the total energy of that system. For a spin-1/2 particle in a magnetic field, the specific form of the Hamiltonian is \(H = -\mu \mathbf{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{B}\).

The eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian represent the possible energy levels of the system. Calculating these eigenvalues involves finding solutions to the characteristic equation \(\det(H - \lambda I) = 0\). This equation essentially determines how a quantum state evolves over time.
  • The process starts by creating a matrix expression through the Pauli matrices and the magnetic field components.
  • The determinant of this matrix minus \(\lambda I\) is computed to find the eigenvalues.
  • In this case, the solution precludes a quadratic formula, resulting in eigenvalues \(\pm \mu B\), where \(B\) is the magnitude of the magnetic field vector: \(B = \sqrt{B_x^2 + B_y^2 + B_z^2}\).
These eigenvalues correspond to the respective energy states for the particle, defining how the quantum state interacts with the magnetic field, significant for understanding its quantum properties and behaviors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Let \(\mathbf{J}\) be angular momentum. (It may stand for orbital \(\mathbf{L}, \operatorname{spin} \mathbf{S},\) or \(\mathbf{J}_{\text {total. }}\) ) Using the fact that \(J_{x}, J_{y}, J_{z}\left(J_{\pm} \equiv J_{x} \pm i J_{y}\right)\) satisfy the usual angular-momentum commutation relations, prove \\[ \mathbf{J}^{2}=J_{z}^{2}+J_{+} J_{-}-\hbar J_{z} \\] (b) Using (a) (or otherwise), derive the "famous" expression for the coefficient \(c_{-}\) that appears in \\[ \boldsymbol{J}_{-} \psi_{j m}=c_{-} \psi_{j, m-1} \\].

Consider the \(2 \times 2\) matrix defined by \\[ U=\frac{a_{0}+i \sigma \cdot \mathbf{a}}{a_{0}-i \sigma \cdot \mathbf{a}}, \\] where \(a_{0}\) is a real number and a is a three-dimensional vector with real components. (a) Prove that \(U\) is unitary and unimodular. (b) In general, a \(2 \times 2\) unitary unimodular matrix represents a rotation in three dimensions. Find the axis and angle of rotation appropriate for \(U\) in terms of \(a_{0}, a_{1}, a_{2},\) and \(a_{3}\).

(a) Consider a pure ensemble of identically prepared spin \(\frac{1}{2}\) systems. Suppose the expectation values \(\left\langle S_{x}\right\rangle\) and \(\left\langle S_{z}\right\rangle\) and the sign of \(\left\langle S_{y}\right\rangle\) are known. Show how we may determine the state vector. Why is it unnecessary to know the magnitude of \(\left\langle S_{y}\right\rangle ?\) (b) Consider a mixed ensemble of spin \(\frac{1}{2}\) systems. Suppose the ensemble aver\(\operatorname{ages}\left[S_{x}\right],\left[S_{y}\right],\) and \(\left[S_{z}\right]\) are all known. Show how we may construct the \(2 \times 2\) density matrix that characterizes the ensemble.

Consider a system made up of two spin \(\frac{1}{2}\) particles. Observer A specializes in measuring the spin components of one of the particles \(\left(s_{1 z}, s_{1 x} \text { and so on }\right),\) while observer \(\mathrm{B}\) measures the spin components of the other particle. Suppose the system is known to be in a spin-singlet state-that is, \(S_{\text {tocal }}=0\) (a) What is the probability for observer \(A\) to obtain \(s_{1 z}=\hbar / 2\) when observer \(B\) makes no measurement? Solve the same problem for \(s_{1 x}=\hbar / 2\) (b) Observer \(\mathrm{B}\) determines the spin of particle 2 to be in the \(s_{2 z}=\hbar / 2\) state with certainty. What can we then conclude about the outcome of observer A's mea- surement (i) if \(A\) measures \(s_{1 z} ;\) (ii) if A measures \(s_{1 x} ?\) Justify your answer.

Consider a spinless particle bound to a fixed center by a central force potential. (a) Relate, as much as possible, the matrix elements \\[ \left\langle n^{\prime}, l^{\prime}, m^{\prime}\left|\mp \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(x \pm i y)\right| n, l, m\right\rangle \quad \text { and } \quad\left\langle n^{\prime}, l^{\prime}, m^{\prime}|z| n, l, m\right\rangle \\] using only the Wigner-Eckart theorem. Make sure to state under what conditions the matrix elements are nonvanishing. (b) Do the same problem using wave functions \(\psi(\mathbf{x})=R_{n l}(r) Y_{l}^{m}(\theta, \phi)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.