/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 28 (a) Let \(x\) and \(p_{x}\) be t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(a) Let \(x\) and \(p_{x}\) be the coordinate momentum and the linear momentum in one dimension. Evaluate the classical Poisson bracket \\[\left[x, F\left(p_{x}\right)\right]_{\text {classical }}\\] (b) Let \(x\) and \(p_{x}\) be the corresponding quantum-mechanical operators this time. Evaluate the commutator \\[\left[x, \exp \left(\frac{i p_{x} a}{\hbar}\right)\right]\\] (c) Using the result obtained in (b), prove that \\[\exp \left(\frac{i p_{x} a}{\hbar}\right)\left|x^{\prime}\right\rangle, \quad\left(x\left|x^{\prime}\right\rangle=x^{\prime}\left|x^{\prime}\right\rangle\right)\\] is an eigenstate of the coordinate operator \(x\). What is the corresponding eigenvalue?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) \(\frac{dF}{dp_x}\). (b) \(-a\exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar})\). (c) Eigenvalue is \(x' + a\).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Poisson Bracket in Classical Mechanics

The Poisson bracket in classical mechanics for two functions \(F\) and \(G\) of \(x\) and \(p_x\) is defined as: \[ [F, G]_{\text{classical}} = \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} \frac{\partial G}{\partial p_x} - \frac{\partial F}{\partial p_x} \frac{\partial G}{\partial x} \].For \([x, F(p_x)]_{\text{classical}}\), set \(F = x\) and \(G = F(p_x)\). Then \(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x} = 1\) and \(\frac{\partial F(p_x)}{\partial p_x} = \frac{dF}{dp_x}\). The other partial derivatives are zero.
02

Calculate the Poisson Bracket

Using the formula for Poisson bracket and the derivatives from Step 1, \[(x, F(p_x))_{\text{classical}} = 1 \cdot \frac{dF}{dp_x} - 0 \cdot 0 = \frac{dF}{dp_x}.\] So, the classical Poisson bracket is \( \frac{dF}{dp_x} \).
03

Understand the Commutator in Quantum Mechanics

In quantum mechanics, the commutator of two operators \( \hat{A} \) and \( \hat{B} \) is defined as \[ [\hat{A}, \hat{B}] = \hat{A}\hat{B} - \hat{B}\hat{A} \]. For the given operators \( [x, \exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar})] \), remember that \([x, p_x] = i\hbar\). Use the property of exponential operators: \( \exp(\hat{A}) \hat{B} \exp(-\hat{A}) = \hat{B} + [\hat{A}, \hat{B}] + \frac{1}{2!}[\hat{A}, [\hat{A}, \hat{B}]] + \ldots \) when \( \hat{A} = \frac{i p_x a}{\hbar} \) and \( \hat{B} = x \).
04

Calculate the Commutator

Using the BCH formula and the commutation relation \([x, p_x] = i\hbar\), calculate the commutator:\[ [x, \exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar})] = x\exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar}) - \exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar})x \].Using \( [x, p_x] = i \hbar \), it simplifies down to:\[ -a\exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar}) \].
05

Verify the Eigenstate and Find the Eigenvalue

\( \exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar})|x'\rangle = |x' + a\rangle \). So when the coordinate operator \(x\) acts on this state, \[ x \exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar}) |x'\rangle = (x' + a) \exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar}) |x'\rangle \]. The eigenvalue is therefore \(x' + a\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Poisson bracket
In classical mechanics, the Poisson bracket is a valuable operation for understanding the dynamics of systems. Given two functions, say \( F(x, p_x) \) and \( G(x, p_x) \), their Poisson bracket is defined mathematically as:
  • \([F, G]_{\text{classical}} = \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} \frac{\partial G}{\partial p_x} - \frac{\partial F}{\partial p_x} \frac{\partial G}{\partial x}\)
This expression involves partial derivatives of these functions with respect to the position \( x \) and momentum \( p_x \). The key insight is that Poisson brackets provide information on how quantities change relative to each other in a system. They are especially useful in determining conserved quantities and are foundational in the transition from classical to quantum mechanics. For example, evaluating the Poisson bracket \([x, F(p_x)]_{\text{classical}}\), leads to \(\frac{dF}{dp_x}\), simplifying due to the nature of \( x \) in this context.
quantum operators
Quantum mechanics operates on the notion of operators rather than simple variables like in classical mechanics. Operators transform quantum states, often represented as wavefunctions.
  • Technically, they are mathematical objects acting on the Hilbert space of a quantum system.
  • Common operators include position \( \hat{x} \) and momentum \( \hat{p}_x \).
These operators follow specific algebraic rules, obtained from the classical counterparts through a scheme called quantization. Operators can be quite abstract, and their properties define the behavior of quantum systems. For example, measuring a quantum operator gives one of the operator’s eigenvalues, a concept which we'll explore further. Quantum operators are crucial in forming the skeleton on which the rules of quantum mechanics are based.
commutator
A commutator in quantum mechanics is a measure of how much two operators fail to commute, that is, how "non-simultaneously" they can be applied.
  • Mathematically, the commutator of operators \( \hat{A} \) and \( \hat{B} \) is defined as: \([\hat{A}, \hat{B}] = \hat{A}\hat{B} - \hat{B}\hat{A}\).
  • For spatial and momentum operators, \([x, p_x] = i\hbar\), which is a fundamental commutation relation.
Understanding and calculating commutators is essential because they determine the uncertainty principle's nature and signify the fundamental non-commutability in quantum mechanics, distinguishing it from classical mechanics where functions can usually be multiplied in any order. In our exercise, finding the commutator of a position operator with an exponential form of momentum helps illustrate these principles.
eigenstate
An eigenstate is an essential quantum concept, representing a state of a quantum system with a definite, predictable outcome when a specific operator is measured.
  • An eigenstate \(|\psi\rangle\) of an operator \(\hat{A}\) satisfies: \(\hat{A}|\psi\rangle = \lambda|\psi\rangle\), where \( \lambda \) is the eigenvalue.
  • Eigenstates provide solutions to quantum systems, meaning when you measure \(\hat{A}\), you'll find \(\lambda\) with certainty.
For quantum mechanics, these eigenstates and eigenvalues define everything from atomic orbitals in an atom to quantum field theory's particles. In our solution, proving \(\exp(\frac{i p_x a}{\hbar})|x'\rangle\) as an eigenstate of the coordinate operator highlights how momentum operations affect positional certainty.
coordinate operator
The coordinate operator in quantum mechanics, typically denoted as \( \hat{x} \), refers to the operator corresponding to the position of a particle.
  • In position space, \(\hat{x}\) acts on wavefunctions by simple multiplication: \(\hat{x}\psi(x) = x\psi(x)\).
  • Coordinate operators commute with themselves but not with momentum, as seen in \([x, p_x] = i\hbar\).
This non-commutation is a direct aspect of quantum uniqueness, leading to phenomena like the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. In exercises like ours, defining and working with coordinate operators illustrates the natural flow from quantum theory’s abstract operator mathematics to the tangible outcomes like particle localization.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two observables \(A_{1}\) and \(A_{2},\) which do not involve time explicitly, are known not to commute, \\[\left[A_{1}, A_{2}\right] \neq 0\\] yet we also know that \(A_{1}\) and \(A_{2}\) both commute with the Hamiltonian: \\[\left[A_{1}, H\right]=0, \quad\left[A_{2}, H\right]=0\\] Prove that the energy eigenstates are, in general, degenerate. Are there exceptions? As an example, you may think of the central-force problem \(H=\mathbf{p}^{2} / 2 m+V(r)\) with \(A_{1} \rightarrow L_{2}, A_{2} \rightarrow L_{x}\).

Consider a three-dimensional ket space. If a certain set of orthonormal kets- say, \(|1\rangle,|2\rangle,\) and \(|3\rangle-\) are used as the base kets, the operators \(A\) and \(B\) are represented by \\[A \doteq\left(\begin{array}{ccc}a & 0 & 0 \\\0 & -a & 0 \\\0 & 0 & -a\end{array}\right), \quad B \doteq\left(\begin{array}{ccc} b & 0 & 0 \\\0 & 0 & -i b \\\0 & i b & 0\end{array}\right)\\] with \(a\) and \(b\) both real. (a) Obviously \(A\) exhibits a degenerate spectrum. Does \(B\) also exhibit a degenerate spectrum? (b) Show that \(A\) and \(B\) commute. (c) Find a new set of orthonormal kets that are simultancous eigenkets of both \(A\) and \(B\). Specify the eigenvalues of \(A\) and \(B\) for each of the three eigenkets, Does your specification of eigenvalues completely characterize each eigenket?

A beam of spin \(\frac{1}{2}\) atoms goes through a series of Stern-Gerlach-type measurements as follows: (a) The first measurement accepts \(s_{z}=h / 2\) atoms and rejects \(s_{z}=-h / 2\) atoms. (b) The second measurement accepts \(s_{n}=\hbar / 2\) atoms and rejects \(s_{n}=-\hbar / 2\) atoms, where \(s_{n}\) is the eigenvalue of the operator \(\mathbf{S} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{n}},\) with \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\) making an angle \(\beta\) in the \(x z\) -plane with respect to the \(z\) -axis. (c) The third measurement accepts \(s_{z}=-\hbar / 2\) atoms and rejects \(s_{z}=\hbar / 2\) atoms. What is the intensity of the final \(s_{z}=-\hbar / 2\) beam when the \(s_{z}=\hbar / 2\) beam surviving the first measurement is normalized to unity? How must we orient the second measuring apparatus if we are to maximize the intensity of the final \(s_{z}=-\hbar / 2\) beam?

Using the orthonormality of \(|+\rangle\) and \(|-\rangle,\) prove \\[\left[S_{i}, S_{j}\right]=i \varepsilon_{i j k} \hbar S_{k}, \quad\left[S_{i}, S_{j}\right]=\left(\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2}\right) \delta_{i j}\\] where \\[\begin{array}{l}\left.S_{x}=\frac{\hbar}{2}(|+)\langle-|+|-\rangle\langle+|\right), \quad S_{y}=\frac{i \hbar}{2}(-|+\rangle\langle-|+|-\rangle\langle+|) \\\S_{z}=\frac{\hbar}{2}(|+\rangle\langle+|-|-\rangle\langle-|)\end{array}\\]

Consider a ket space spanned by the eigenkets \(\left\\{\left|a^{\prime}\right\rangle\right\\}\) of a Hermitian operator \(A\) There is no degeneracy. (a) Prove that \\[\prod_{a^{\prime}}\left(A-a^{\prime}\right)\\] is the null operator. (b) Explain the significance of \\[\prod_{a^{\prime \prime} \neq a^{\prime}} \frac{\left(A-a^{\prime \prime}\right)}{\left(a^{\prime}-a^{\prime \prime}\right)}\\] (c) Illustrate (a) and (b) using \(A\) set equal to \(S_{z}\) of a spin \(\frac{1}{2}\) system.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.