/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q25E The electron is known to have a ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The electron is known to have a radius no larger than 1018m. If actually produced by circulating mass, its intrinsic angular momentum of roughlywould imply very high speed, even if all that mass were as far from the axis as possible.

(a) Using simplyrp(from |r 脳 p|) for the angular momentum of a mass at radius r, obtain a rough value of p and show that it would imply a highly relativistic speed.

(b) At such speeds,E=纬尘肠2andp=纬尘耻combine to giveEpc(just as for the speedy photon). How does this energy compare with the known internal energy of the electron?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The rough value of p is1.0551016kgm/s.
  2. This energy is much greater than the known internal energy of the electron.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of spin angular momentum

The spin angular momentum of light (SAM) is the component of the angular momentum of light that is associated with the quantum spin and the rotation between the polarization degrees of freedom of the photon.

02

Aim of the question

This question aims to prove that the intrinsic/spin angular momentum(S) of the electron does not have a classical analog. Part (a) of this question instructs us to use the simple formula for angular momentum (L=rp)to prove that such an angular momentum of a value roughly equalingh would imply a relativistic speed. Part (b) asks us to compare the relativistic energy with the known internal/rest energy of the electron.

03

Determine the value of p(a)

Taking the intrinsic angular momentum of the electron (Sh)to simply equal rpwhere the electron's radius is taken to be 1018m, we can calculate the momentum pas follows,

S=rp

=(1018m)p

p=1018m=1.0051034Js1018m=1.0551016kgm/s.............................(2)

If we treatpit classically, this would mean that the electron's speed has the value

u=pm=1.0551016kgm/s9.11031kg=1.161014m/s

This value is much greater than the speed of light (c=3108m/s)which is not allowed according to the special theory of relativity. So next, we try to treat prelativistically to get u.

The relativistic momentum is given by p=纬尘耻where =11u2/c2.

Accordingly, solving for u gives us the following formula,

u=(p/m)21+(p/m)2/c2

We have already calculatedp/me in our failed attempt to treat pclassically. Substituting then- gives us

u=(1.161014m/s)21+(1.161014m/s)2/(3108m/s)2=3108m/s

Which equals the speed of light!

Therefore the rough value of p is1.0551016kgm/s.

04

Energy Comparison(b)

At such high relativistic speeds, the electron's energy can be approximated as

Epc=(1.0551016kgm/s)(3108m/s)=3.165108J=21011eV

Whereas the rest energy of the electron is

Eo=mc2=(9.11031kg)(3108m/s)2=8.191014J=5.1105eV

Accordingly,E>>Eo and the approximationEpc is justified.

These results imply that the electron behaves similar to a with speed which is not the reality of the situation

Therefore energy is much greater than the known internal energy of the electron.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the symmetric and anti symmetric combinations of (819)and(820)are solutions of the two. Particle Schr枚dinger equation(813)of the same energy asn(x1)m(x2), the unsymmetrized product(817).

A Simple Model: The multielectron atom is unsolvable, but simple models go a long way. Section7.8gives energies and orbit radii forone-electron/hydrogenlike atoms. Let us see how useful these are by considering lithium.

(a) Treat one of lithium'sn=1electrons as a single electron in a one-electron atom ofrole="math" localid="1659948261120" Z=3. Find the energy and orbit radius.

(b) The othern=1electron being in the same spatial state. must have the same energy and radius, but we must account for the repulsion between these electrons. Assuming they are roughly one orbit diameter apart, what repulsive energy would they share, and if each claims half this energy. what would be the energies of these two electrons?

(c) Approximately what charge does lithium's lone valence electron orbit, and what radius and energy would it have?

(d) Is in reasonable to dismiss the role of then=1electrons in chemical reactions?

(e) The actual energies of lithium's electrons are about-98eV(twice, of course) and-5.4eV. How good is the model?

(f) Why should the model's prediction for the valence electron's energy differ in the direction it does from the actual value?

Suppose that the channel鈥檚 outgoing end is in the hydrogen l=0Stem-Gerlach apparatus of the figure. You place a second such apparatus whose channel is aligned with the first but rotated 90about the x-axis, so that its B 鈥揻ield lines point roughly in the y-direction instead of the. What would you see emerging at the end of your added apparatus? Consider the behavior of the spin-up and spin-down beams separately. Assume that when these beams are separated in the first apparatus, we can choose to block one or the other for study, but also assume that neither deviates too far from the center of the channel.

The spin-orbit interaction splits the hydrogen 4f state into many.

(a)Identity these states and rank them in order of increasing energy.

(b)If a weak external magnetic field were now introduced (weak enough that it does not disturb the spin-orbit coupling). Into how many different energies would each of these states be split?

Question: Solving (or attempting to solve!) a 4-electron problem is not twice as hard as solving a 2-electrons problem. Would you guess it to be more or less than twice as hard? Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.