/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q80E The weight of the Empire State B... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The weight of the Empire State Building is 365kilotons. Show that the complete conversion of 1kgof mass would provide sufficient energy to putli.is rather large object in a low Earth orbit or LEO for short. (Orbit radius ≃Earth's radius).

Short Answer

Expert verified

LEO is the orbit very close to the earth’s surface, mostly under 1000km, but can be as low as 160km. Here, in this problem we have to check if conversion energy of 1kg of mass is sufficient to get the Empire State Building of 365 kilotons into a low earth orbit.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the conversion energy of mass of1 kg

Here, the conversion energy can be easily calculated using Einstein’s famous mass-energy relation, that is E=mc2

=9×1016J

02

Determine the energy required to get the building to low earth orbit

To get an object in LEO, the first object needs to be moved from the surface to an altitude of 160kmor more and it needs a minimum velocity to stay in orbit to avoid crashing. This minimum velocity required to stay in orbit is called orbital velocity.

Velocity Vo=gRE=GMERE. For simplicity we will assume that the earth is not rotating that is the building is initially at rest. Now, we will apply Work-Energy relation for Earth-Building system,

W=ΔK+ΔU

=12MBVo2+GMEMB1RE-12Ro

Here, the orbit radius is the same as the earth’s radius as given in the problem statement. And by putting values of quantities in the above equation we get the value of energy1.14×1016J as which is far less compared to conversion energy of 1kgof mass. Therefore, the conversion energy of1kg mass is quite sufficient to get such a massive object that is The Empire State Building into Low Earth Orbit.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A 10kgobject is moving to the right at 0.6c. It explodes into two pieces, one of mass m1moving left at 0.6cand one of mass m2moving right at 0.8c

(a) Find m1 and m2.

(b) Find the change in kinetic energy in this explosion.

Both classically and relativistically, the force on an object is what causes a time rate of change of its momentum: F=dp/dt.

(a) using the relativistically correct expression for momentum, show that

F=γu3mdudt

(b) Under what conditions does the classical equation F=mahold?

(c) Assuming a constant force and that the speed is zero at t=0, separate t and u, then integrate to show that

u=11+(Ft/mc)2Fmt

(d) Plot uversest. What happens to the velocity of an object when a constant force is applied for an indefinite length of time?

A particle of mass m。moves through the lab at 0.6c. Suddenly it explodes into two fragments. Fragment 1 , mass 0.66m0, moves at 0.8cin the same direction the original particle had been moving. Determine the velocity (magnitude and direction) and mass of fragment2.

Show that the relativistic expression for kinetic energy (γ-1)mc2is equivalent to the classical 12mu2 when u≪c

Suppose particles begin moving in one dimension away from the origin att=0with the following velocities: 0,±1,±2,±3 m/sand so on. (a) After 1 s , how will the velocities of the particles depend on distance from the origin? (b) Now consider an observer on one of the moving particles not at the origin. How will the relative velocities of the other particles depend on distance from the observer?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.