/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q118CE Question: A rocket maintains a c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Question: A rocket maintains a constant thrust F, giving it an acceleration of g

(i.e.,9.8m/s2).

(a) If classical physics were valid, how long would it take for the rocket鈥檚 speed to reach 0.99c??

(b) Using the result of exercise 117(c), how long would it really take to reach 0.99c??

u=11+(Ft/mc)2FTt

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. If classical approximations were valid for high speeds,it would take almost a year for the rocket to reach 0.99c,
  2. But in reality o.e., relativistic-ally,it would take around seven years.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the time required to reach 0.99 cclassically

(a) Using classical kinematic equations,

v=u+at

Let鈥檚 consider the rocket was initially at rest, and then due to constant thrust, it traveled at an acceleration of g.

v=gtt=vgt=0.993108ms9.8ms2t=3.03107s

Therefore, classically,the time required to reach the velocity of is0.96 years or around350 days.

02

Determine the time required to reach 0.99 crelativistically

(b) Now,relativistic-ally,

u=11+(Ft/mc)2FTt=muF1+Ftmc2t2=muF21+Ftmc2

Here, F=ma=mg

t2=ug21+gtc2

Rearranging further to get an equation for t ,

t=ug1-u2c2=0.99c9.8ms21-(0.99)2=2.143108s=6.795yrs

.

Hence, the time the rocket really takes to reach 0.99cis6.8years.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Appearing in the time-dilation and length-contraction formulas, v , is a reasonable measure of the size of relativistic effects. Roughly speaking, at what speed would observations deviate from classical expectations by 1 %?

A thin plate has a round hole whose diameter in its rest is D. The plate is parallel to the ground and moving upward, in the +y direction, relative to the ground. A thin round disk whose diameter in its rest frame is D direction is also parallel to the ground but moving in the +x relative to it. In the frame of the ground, the plate and disk are on course so that the centers of the bole and disk wiIl at some point coincide. The disk is contracted, but the hole in the plate is not, so the disk will pass through the hole. Now consider the frame of the disk. The disk is of diameter D, but the hole is contracted. Can the disk pass through the hole, and if so, how?

By what factor would a star's characteristic wavelengths of light be shifted if it were moving away from Earth at 0.9c?

A projectile is a distance r from the center of a heavenly body and is heading directly away. Classically, if the sum of its kinetic and potential energies is positive, it will escape the gravitational pull of the body, but if negative, it cannot escape. Now imagine that the projectile is a pulse of light energy E. Since light has no internal energy ,E is also the kinetic energy of the light pulse. Suppose that the gravitational potential energy of the light pulse is given by Newton鈥檚 classical formula U=-(GMm/r), where M is the mass of the heavenly body and m is an 鈥渆ffective mass鈥 of the light pulse. Assume that this effective mass is given by m=E/c2.

Show that the critical radius for which light could not escape the gravitational pull of a heavenly body is within a factor of 2 of the Schwarzschild radius given in the chapter. (This kind of 鈥渟emiclassical鈥 approach to general relativity is sometimes useful but always vague. To be reliable, predictions must be based from beginning to end on the logical, but unfortunately complex, fundamental equations of general relativity.)

What are the momentum, energy, and kinetic energy of a proton moving at 0.8c?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.