/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q52E We have noted that for a given e... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

We have noted that for a given energy, as lincreases, the motion is more like a circle at a constant radius, with the rotational energy increasing as the radial energy correspondingly decreases. But is the radial kinetic energy 0 for the largest lvalues? Calculate the ratio of expectation values, radial energy to rotational energy, for the(n,l,mt)=(2.1,+1)state. Use the operators

KEÁåžrad=-h22m1r2∂∂r(r∂∂r)KEÁåžrad=h2l(l+1)2mr2

Which we deduce from equation (7-30).

Short Answer

Expert verified

The ratio of expectation values of radial energy to the rotational energy is -12l(l+1)3.

Step by step solution

01

 Given data

radial kinetic energy,KEÁåžrad=-h22m1r2∂∂r(r∂∂r)

rotational kinetic energy,KEÁåžrad=h2l(l+1)2mr2

Where, l is the orbital quantum number.

02

 Concept

Expression for radial function having a principal quantum number equal to 2 and an orbital quantum number equal to 1 will be:

R2,1(r)=1(2a0)3/2r3a0e-r(2a0)

Here,a0represents Bohr's radius and rrepresents radial distance.

03

 To determine the ratio of expectation values of radial energy to the rotational energy

Now, apply the radial kinetic energy operator on R2,1r as follows.

-h22m1r2ddrrddrR2,1(r)=-h22m1r2-1ra0+14a02R2,1(r)

This is because

ddrre-2a0=e-r2a01+r-2a0

Thus,

ddrr2e-r2a01+r-2a0=e-r2a02r+r2-2a01+r-2a0+r2-2a0

Now the expectation value for radial kinetic energy is calculated as follows.

∫0∞-h22m2r2-2ra0+14a02R2,12rdr=-h22m12a0313a02∫0∞2r2-2ra0+14a02r2e-r/a0dr=-h22m12a04∫0∞2-2x+14x2e-xdx=h248m12a042-2+24=h296m1a04

And, the expectation value for rotational kinetic energy is as follows.

role="math" localid="1659322811595" ∫0∞-h22mll+1r2R2,12(r)dr=h22m12a0313a02ll+1∫0∞1e-r/a0dr=h248m1a04ll+1

The ratio of radial kinetic energy and rotational kinetic energy is calculated as follows.

-h296m1d04h248m1a04ll+1=12ll+1

The ratio goes to 0 as l goes to infinity.

Therefore, the ratio of expectation values of radial energy to the rotational energy is -12ll+1.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a vibrating molecule that behaves as a simple harmonic oscillator of mass 10-27kg, spring constant 103N/m and charge is +e , (a) Estimate the transition time from the first excited state to the ground state, assuming that it decays by electric dipole radiation. (b) What is the wavelength of the photon emitted?

Imagine two classical charges of -q, each bound to a central charge of. +q One -q charge is in a circular orbit of radius R about its +q charge. The other oscillates in an extreme ellipse, essentially a straight line from it’s +q charge out to a maximum distance rmax.The two orbits have the same energy. (a) Show thatrmax=2r. (b) Considering the time spent at each orbit radius, in which orbit is the -q charge farther from its +q charge on average?

Can the transition 2s→1s in the hydrogen atom occur by electric dipole radiation? The lifetime of the 2 s is known to be unusual. Is it unusually short or long?

Question: Explain to your friend. who has just learned about simple one-dimensional standing waves on a string fixed at its ends, why hydrogen's electron has only certain energies, and why, for some of those energies, the electron can still be in different states?

In section 7.5,eimlφis presented a sour preferred solution to the azimuthal equation, but there is more general one that need not violate the smoothness condition, and that in fact covers not only complex exponentials but also suitable redelinitions of multiplicative constants, sine, and cosine,

Φm1(Φ)=Ae+imlφ+Be+imlφ

(a) Show that the complex square of this function is not, in general, independent of φ.

(b) What conditions must be met by A and/or B for the probability density to be rotationally symmetric – that is, independent of φ ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.