/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q22E Consider a cubic 3D infinite wel... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Consider a cubic 3D infinite well.

(a) How many different wave functions have the same energy as the one for which (nx,ny,nz)=(5,1,1)?

(b) Into how many different energy levels would this level split if the length of one side were increased by 5% ?

(c) Make a scale diagram, similar to Figure 3, illustrating the energy splitting of the previously degenerate wave functions.

(d) Is there any degeneracy left? If so, how might it be 鈥渄estroyed鈥?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) There are two other wave functions having the same energy as the one for which nx,ny,nz=5,1,1.

(b) This energy level would split into two new energy levels if the length of one side is increased by 5%.

(c) The scale diagram is as follows

(d) There will still be two wave functions having the same energy. This can be removed by changing any of the side lengths by a small amount.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

There is a 3D infinite cubic well.

02

Energy in an infinite well

The energy of a particle of mass m in a 3D infinite well of sides Lx, Lyand Lz is

E=222mnx2Lx2+ny2Ly2+nz2Lz2 ..... (I)

Here, is the reduced Planck's constant and nx, ny and nz are the quantum numbers

03

Step 3:Determining the degeneracy of energy in a cubic well

(a)

For a cubic well, the energy in equation (I) reduces to

E=222mL2nx2+ny2+nz2 ..... (II)

Thus the energy when any one of nx,ny,nz is 5 and the rest two are 1 are the same. Hence the wave functions corresponding to nx,ny,nz=5,1,1, nx,ny,nz=1,5,1 and nx,ny,nz=1,1,5 have the same energies. There are three wave functions having the same energy.

04

Determining the splitting in energy level

(b)

Let the length along X axis, that isLx be increased by 5%. The new length is then $1.05L$. The energy in equation (II) becomes

E=222mL2nx21.052+ny2+nz2

Thus the wave function corresponding tonx,ny,nz=5,1,1will now have lower energy than the wave functions corresponding to nx,ny,nz=1,5,1andnx,ny,nz=1,1,5. The previous energy level will thus split into two separate energy levels.

05

Plotting the energy levels

(c)

The plot of the initial and final energy levels are as follows

06

Determining the residual degeneracy

(d)

There are still two wave functions corresponding to nx,ny,nz=1,5,1 and nx,ny,nz=1,1,5 that are in the same energy level. Thus a degeneracy of 2 is left. This can be removed if one of the lengths along x or y axis is slightly changed making the energy equation equal to equation (I).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A comet of 1014kg mass describes a very elliptical orbit about a star of mass31030kg , with its minimum orbit radius, known as perihelion, being role="math" localid="1660116418480" 1011m and its maximum, or aphelion, 100 times as far. When at these minimum and maximum

radii, its radius is, of course, not changing, so its radial kinetic energy is 0, and its kinetic energy is entirely rotational. From classical mechanics, rotational energy is given by L22I, where Iis the moment of inertia, which for a 鈥減oint comet鈥 is simply mr2.

(a) The comet鈥檚 speed at perihelion is6.2945104m/s . Calculate its angular momentum.

(b) Verify that the sum of the gravitational potential energy and rotational energy are equal at perihelion and aphelion. (Remember: Angular momentum is conserved.)

(c) Calculate the sum of the gravitational potential energy and rotational energy when the orbit radius is 50 times perihelion. How do you reconcile your answer with energy conservation?

(d) If the comet had the same total energy but described a circular orbit, at what radius would it orbit, and how would its angular momentum compare with the value of part (a)?

(e) Relate your observations to the division of kinetic energy in hydrogen electron orbits of the same nbut different I.

A wave function with a non-infinite wavelength-however approximate it might be- has nonzero momentum and thus nonzero kinetic energy. Even a single "bump" has kinetic energy. In either case, we can say that the function has kinetic energy because it has curvature- a second derivative. Indeed, the kinetic energy operator in any coordinate system involves a second derivative. The only function without kinetic energy would be a straight line. As a special case, this includes a constant, which may be thought of as a function with an infinite wavelength. By looking at the curvature in the appropriate dimension(s). answer the following: For a givenn,isthe kinetic energy solely

(a) radial in the state of lowest l- that is, l=0; and

(b) rotational in the state of highest l-that is, l=n-1?

(a) What is the expectation value of the distance from the proton of an electron in a 3p state? (b) How does this compare with the expectation value in the 3 d state, calculated in Example 7.7? Discuss any differences.

Show that a transition wherem1=1corresponds to a dipole moment in the xy-plane, while m1=0 corresponds to a moment along the z-axis. (You need to consider only the -parts of therole="math" localid="1659783155213" i andf , which are of the form eiml):

Mathematically equation (7-22) is the same differential equation as we had for a particle in a box-the function and its second derivative are proportional. But()for m1= 0is a constant and is allowed, whereas such a constant wave function is not allowed for a particle in a box. What physics accounts for this difference?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.