/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q18E For the cubic 3D infinite well w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For the cubic 3D infinite well wave function

ψ(x,y,z)=AsinnxπxLsinnyπyLsinnzπzLshow that the correct normalization constant isA=(2/L)3/2.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The normalization constant is 2L3/2.

Step by step solution

01

 Given data

Cubic 3D infinite well wave function is given as:

ψ(x,y,z)=AsinnxπxLsinnyπyLsinnzπzL

02

 Normalization condition

The normalization condition can be expressed as:

∮|ψx,y,z|=AsinnxπxLsinnyπyLsinnzπzL

We know that the probability of finding the particle will always be 1.

03

 To determine the normalization constant

Evaluate the normalization condition for a given 3D infinite well solution to determine the value of the normalization constant A as:

For a 3D infinite well, its wave function is given by

ψ(x,y,z)=AsinnxπxLsinnyπyLsinnzπzL

Here,

L is the edge length of the square well.

We know that the probability density ψx,y,z2integrated over the volume of the 3D box must equal 1. Thus, we have

∫0L∫0L∫0L∫0Lψx,y,z2dxdydz=1

∫0L ∫0L ∫0L AsinnxπxLsinnyπyLsinnzπzL2dxdydz=1∫0L ∫0L ∫0L A2sin2nxπxLsin2nyπyLsin2nzπzLdxdydz=1A2∫0L ∫0L ∫0L sin2nxπxLsin2nyπyLsin2nzπzLdxdydz=1A2∫0L sin2nxπxLdx∫0L sin2nyπyLdy∫0L sin2nzπzLdz=1

1)

All three integrals multiplying each other are of the same form, for different values of nx,ny,nz so next evaluation just one of them for an arbitrary n.

Visualizing the dependence of the trigonometric functions graphically leads to the conclusion that,

∫0L sin2nxπxLdx∫0L sin2nyπyLdy=∫0L sin2nzπzLdz

Therefore, one segment can be solved as:

∫0L sin2nxπxLdx=L2

Thus, all three integrals multiplying each other in equation (1) are equal to each other and to L2.

Therefore, the equation (1) becomes,

A2L2L2L2=1A2L23=1A2=2L3A2=2L3/2

04

 Conclusion

Therefore, the normalization constant is 2L3/2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Diatomic Molecule: Exercise 80 discusses the idea of reduced mass. Classically or quantum mechanically, we can digest the behavior of a two-particle system into motion of the center of mass and motion relative to the center of mass. Our interest here is the relative motion, which becomes a one-particle problem if we merely use μfor the mass for that particle. Given this simplification, the quantum-mechanical results we have learned go a long way toward describing the diatomic molecule. To a good approximation, the force between the bound atoms is like an ideal spring whose potential energy is 12kx2, where x is the deviation of the atomic separation from its equilibrium value, which we designate with an a. Thus,x=r-a . Because the force is always along the line connecting the two atoms, it is a central force, so the angular parts of the Schrödinger equation are exactly as for hydrogen, (a) In the remaining radial equation (7- 30), insert the potential energy 12kx2and replace the electron massm with μ. Then, with the definition.f(r)=rR(r), show that it can be rewritten as

-ħ22μd2dr2f(r)+ħ2I(I+1)2μr2f(r)+12kx2f(r)=Ef(r)

With the further definition show that this becomes

-ħ22μd2dx2g(x)+ħ2I(I+1)2μ(x+a)g(x)+12kx2g(x)=Eg(x)

(b) Assume, as is quite often the case, that the deviation of the atoms from their equilibrium separation is very small compared to that separation—that is,x<<a. Show that your result from part (a) can be rearranged into a rather familiar- form, from which it follows that
E=(n+12)ħkμ+ħ2I(I+1)2μa2n=0,1,2,...I=0,1,2,...

(c)

Identify what each of the two terms represents physically.

At heart, momentum conservation is related to the universe being "translationally invariant," meaning that it is the same if you shift your coordinates to the right or left. Angular momentum relates to rotational invariance. Use these ideas to explain at least some of the differences between the physical properties quantized in the cubic three-dimensional box versus the hydrogen atom.

Doubly ionized lithium, Li2+absorbs a photon and jumps from the ground state to its n=2level. What was the wavelength of the photon?

For a hydrogen atom in the ground state. determine (a) the most probable location at which to find the electron and (b) the most probable radius at which to find the electron, (c) Comment on the relationship between your answers in parts (a) and (b).

Classically, an orbiting charged particle radiates electromagnetic energy, and for an electron in atomic dimensions, it would lead to collapse in considerably less than the wink of an eye.

(a) By equating the centripetal and Coulomb forces, show that for a classical charge -e of mass m held in a circular orbit by its attraction to a fixed charge +e, the following relationship holds

Ӭ=er-3/24πε0m.

(b) Electromagnetism tells us that a charge whose acceleration is a radiates power P=e2a2/6ε0c3. Show that this can also be expressed in terms of the orbit radius as P=e696π2ε03m2c3r4. Then calculate the energy lost per orbit in terms of r by multiplying the power by the period T=2π/Ӭand using the formula from part (a) to eliminate .

(c) In such a classical orbit, the total mechanical energy is half the potential energy, or Eorbit=-e28πε0r. Calculate the change in energy per change in r : dEorbit/dr. From this and the energy lost per obit from part (b), determine the change in per orbit and evaluate it for a typical orbit radius of 10-10m. Would the electron's radius change much in a single orbit?

(d) Argue that dividing dEorbit/dr by P and multiplying by dr gives the time required to change r by dr . Then, sum these times for all radii from rinitial to a final radius of 0. Evaluate your result for rinitial=10-10m. (One limitation of this estimate is that the electron would eventually be moving relativistically).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.