/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q14E To show,(a) 唯1(x,t)=Aeikx鈭抜蝇... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

To show,

(a) 1(x,t)=Aeikxitis the solution of both Klein-Gordon and the Schrodinger equations.

(b) 2(x,t)=Aeikxcostis the solution of both Klein-Gordon but not the Schrodinger equations.

(c) The2 is a combination of positive and negative energy solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation.

(d) To compare the time dependence of2 for 1and 2.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The solution of both Klein-Gordon and the Schrodinger equations is1(x,t)=Aeikxit.

(b) The solution of both Klein-Gordon but not the Schrodinger equations 2(x,t)=Aeikxcost.

(c) The first part 12Aeikx+it is the negative energy solution, and the second part 12Aeikxit is the positive energy.

(d) The function|1|2 doesn't have the time dependence but |2|2 has the time dependence.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The given functions are 1 and2 .

02

Concept of the Wave equation

The Klein-Gordon equation is given as,

c222x2(x,t)+m2c4(x,t)=22t2(x,t)

.

The Schr枚dinger Equation is given as,

.

22m2x2(x,t)=it(x,t)

03

Take second order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function Ψ1(x,t)=Aeikx−iωt

(a)

Second order partial derivative of the wave function with respect to x as:

2dx21(x,t)=k21(x,t) 鈥︹赌(1)

Second order partial derivative of the wave function with respecttas:

2t21(x,t)=21(x,t) 鈥︹赌.(2)

After substitution equations (1) and (2) in the Klein-Gordon equation, obtain:

c2k221(x,t)+m2c41(x,t)=221(x,t)

Substitute p=k andE= in the above equation and simplify as:

c2p2+m2c4=E2

From special relativity, the wave function is proved to be a solution.

04

Take first order partial derivative of Candidate function Ψ1(x,t)=Aeikx−iωt

Taking first order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function with respect to x as:

t1(x,t)=t(Aeikxit)=i1(x,t)

鈥︹赌(3)

After substitution equations (1) and (3) in the Schr枚dinger equation, obtain:

2k22m1(x,t)=p22m1(x,t)

On the right, we have,

.1(x,t)=E1(x,t)

For nonrelativistic particles,

.E=p22m

The wave function is proved to be a solution.

1(x,t)=Aeikxitis the solution of both Klein-Gordon and the Schrodinger equations.

05

Take second order partial derivative of the Candidate wave functionΨ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωt  

(b)

The Candidate wave function is given as,

.

2(x,t)=Aeikxcost

Second order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function with respect to x as:

2x22(x,t)=AeikxtcostiK2=k22(x,t)

Second order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function with respect t as:

2t22(x,t)=Aeikxcost(2)=22(x,t)

From special relativity, the wave function is proved to be a solution.

Similarly, takethe first order partial derivative of the Candidate wave function with respect to x as:

t2(x,t)=Aeikxsint()2(x,t)

The wave function is proved not to be a solution.

2(x,t)=Aeikxcostis the solution of both Klein-Gordon but not the Schrodinger equations.

06

Calculation to show  Ψ2 is a combination of positive and negative energy solutions 

(c)

The Candidate wave function is given, as shown below:

2(x,t)=Aeikxcostcos=eix+eix2

The Candidate wave function is given as,

2(x,t)=Aeikxcost

After the expansion ofcost in exponential terms, obtain:

2(x,t)=Aeikxcost2(x,t)=Aeikxeit+eiax22(x,t)=12Aeikx+it+12Aeikxit

The first part 12Aeikx+itis the negative energy solution, and the second part 12Aeikxitis a positive energy.

07

Comparison of the time dependence of   Ψ2forΨ1   and  Ψ2 

(d)

The Candidate wave function is given as,

.1(x,t)=Aeikxit

The probability density is given as follows:

|1(x,t)|2=(Aeikxit)2|1(x,t)|2=A2

For the first Candidate, since all the positive and time dependence is in terms of the exponential of an imaginary number,

|1(x,t)|2=A2

So, it does not have time dependence.

The Candidate wave function is given as,

.2(x,t)=Aeikxcost

The probability density is given as below:

|2(x,t)|2=(Aeikxcost)2|2(x,t)|2=A2cos2t

So, it does have time dependence.

The function |1|2doesn't have the time dependence but|2|2 has the time dependence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For solutions of Klein-Gordon equation, the quantity,

ititis interpreted as charge density. Show that for a positive-energy plane-wavesolution. It is a real constant, and for negative-energy solution.It is a negative of that constant.

Table 12.1 gives the width of the K0 meson

(a) Approximately what is the its lifetime?.

(b) This meson鈥檚 actual radius is on the order 1 fm. Would its constituents have the time to bounce around inside a great deal?

Someone proposes the existence of a new force whose range is10-20 m. We found in Chapter 2 that accelerator turn kinetic energy into mass. About how much energy do you estimate an accelerator would need to create the mediating particle for such a force.

You are a promising theoretical physicist who does not believe that gravity is a distinct fundamental force but is instead related to the other forces by an all-encompassing relativistic, quantum-mechanical theory. In particular, you do not believe that the universal gravitational constant G is really one of nature's elite set of fundamental constants. You believe that Gcan be derived from more-basic constants: the fundamental constant of quantum mechanics, Planck's constanth ; the fundamental speed limiting the propagation of any force, the speed of lightc ; and one other- a fundamental length l, important to the one unified force. Using simply dimensional analysis, find a formula for G, and then an order-of magnitude value for the fundamental length.

Why would it be argued that the range of the strong force should be infinite, and why it isn鈥檛?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.