Chapter 5: Q41E (page 188)
To determine the two bound state energies for the well.
Short Answer
The two bound state energies for a well is and .
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 5: Q41E (page 188)
To determine the two bound state energies for the well.
The two bound state energies for a well is and .
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Simple models are very useful. Consider the twin finite wells shown in the figure, at First with a tiny separation. Then with increasingly distant separations, In all case, the four lowest allowed wave functions are planned on axes proportional to their energies. We see that they pass through the classically forbidden region between the wells, and we also see a trend. When the wells are very close, the four functions and energies are what we might expect of a single finite well, but as they move apart, pairs of functions converge to intermediate energies.
(a) The energies of the second and fourth states decrease. Based on changing wavelength alone, argue that is reasonable.
(b) The energies of the first and third states increase. Why? (Hint: Study bow the behaviour required in the classically forbidden region affects these two relative to the others.)
(c) The distant wells case might represent two distant atoms. If each atom had one electron, what advantage is there in bringing the atoms closer to form a molecule? (Note: Two electrons can have the same wave function.)

The particle has .
(a) Show that the potential energy for x>0is given by
(b) What is the potential energy for x<0?
Show that the uncertainty in the position of a ground state harmonic oscillator is .
Quantum-mechanical stationary states are of the general form . For the basic plane wave (Chapter 4), this is , and for a particle in a box it is . Although both are sinusoidal, we claim that the plane wave alone is the prototype function whose momentum is pure-a well-defined value in one direction. Reinforcing the claim is the fact that the plane wave alone lacks features that we expect to see only when, effectively, waves are moving in both directions. What features are these, and, considering the probability densities, are they indeed present for a particle in a box and absent for a plane wave?
Consider a particle of mass mand energy E in a region where the potential energy is constant U0. Greater than E and the region extends to
(a) Guess a physically acceptable solution of the Schrodinger equation in this region and demonstrate that it is solution,
(b) The region noted in part extends from x = + 1 nm to . To the left of x = 1nm. The particle鈥檚 wave function is Dcos (109m-1 x). Is also greater than Ehere?
(c) The particle鈥檚 mass m is 10-3 kg. By how much (in eV) doesthe potential energy prevailing from x=1 nm to U0. Exceed the particle鈥檚 energy?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.