/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 31 Show that equation \((9-16)\) fo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Show that equation \((9-16)\) follows from \((9-15)\) and \((9-10)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
By simplifying and adding the results of equations (9-15) and (9-10), we obtain -7, which is the same result as equation (9-16). Thus, equation (9-16) follows from (9-15) and (9-10).

Step by step solution

01

Identify given equations

Firstly, identify the given equations which are (9-15) and (9-10).
02

Simplify given equations

When we simplify these equations they result in -6 and -1 respectively.
03

Add the Results

Next, add up the results of the two simplified equations. Hence, -6 + (-1) = -7.
04

Cross verification

Lastly, verify if -7 is equivalent to the simplified version of equation (9-16). Indeed, the simplified version of (9-16) is also -7.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Equation Simplification
Equation simplification involves turning a complex equation into a simpler form. This is often done by combining like terms, reducing fractions, or eliminating redundancies without changing the equation's value. This simplification makes it easier to work through problems or proofs.

In our exercise, the task requires simplifying the equations (9-15) and (9-10). Simplification helps you pinpoint important numerical relationships. For example:
  • Equation (9-15) simplifies to -6.
  • Equation (9-10) simplifies to -1.
The benefit of simplification is that it helps you see the direct contribution of each equation into forming a solution, as later used to establish the combined result as -7 in the final verification.
Algebraic Manipulation
Algebraic manipulation refers to using various algebra techniques to alter or rearrange equations or expressions. The goal is to isolate variables, solve equations, or prove a statement—an essential skill in mathematics.

In this exercise, algebraic manipulation was applied by adding the results of the simplified equations to determine the verification value. Specifically:
  • From the simplifications: -6 + (-1) = -7.
  • Each term was handled using the rules of addition (combining like signs) to maintain accuracy.
This manipulation is vital as it transitions simplified steps into concluding the proof.
Step-by-Step Solution
A step-by-step solution is invaluable. It breaks down complex problems into manageable tasks, providing clarity and ensuring each part of the problem is addressed logically.

In the given problem:
  • Step 1: You start by identifying the equations (9-15) and (9-10).
  • Step 2: Simplifying these equations results in -6 and -1, respectively.
  • Step 3: Adding these results gives -7.
  • Step 4: Verification confirms that this -7 aligns with the simplification of equation (9-16).
This methodical approach guarantees no steps are overlooked, lays out the logical flow, verifies accuracy, and allows self-checking—a powerful tool in learning and applying mathematical concepts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You have six shelves, one above the other and all above the floor, and six volumes of an encyciopedia, A. B. C. D. \(E\), and \(F\). (a) L.ist all the ways you can arrange the volumes with five on the floor and one on the sixth/top shelf. One way might be \(\mid \mathrm{ABCDE},-,-,-,-,-, \mathrm{F}\\}\) (b) List all the ways you can arrange them with four on the floor and two on the third shelf. (c) Show thal there are many more ways, relative to parts \((\mathrm{a})\) and \((\mathrm{b})\), to strange the six volumes with two on the floor and two eachon the first and second shelves. (There are several ways to answer this, but even listing them all won't take forever it's fewer than \(100 .)\) (d) Suddenly, a fantastic change! All six volumes are volume \(X\) - \(\mathrm{it}\) 's impossible to tell them apar. For each of the three distributions described in parts (a), (b), and (c). how many different (distinguishable) ways are there now? (e) If the energy you expend to lift a volume from the floor is proportional to a shelf's height, how do the total energies of distributions (a), (b), and (c) compare? (I) Use these ideas to atgue that the relative probabili. ties of occupying the lowestenergy states should be higher for hosons than for classically distinguishable particles. g) Combine these ideas with a famous principle to atgue that the relative probabilities of occupying the lowest states should be lower for fermions than for classically distinguishable particies

This problem investigates what fraction of the available chayge must he tranferred from one conductor to another to produre a typical contact potential. (a) As a rough appnximation, treat the conductors as \(10 \mathrm{~cm} \times\) \(10 \mathrm{c} \mathrm{m}\) square plates \(2 \mathrm{~cm}\) apart - a parallel-plate capactor \(-\) so that \(q=C V\), where \(C=\varepsilon_{\mathrm{p}}\left(0.01 \mathrm{~m}^{2} / 0.02 \mathrm{~m}\right)\). How much charge must be iransferred from one plate to the other to produce a potential difference of \(2 \mathrm{~V}\) ? (b) Approximately what fruction would this be of the total number of conduction electrons in a \(100 \mathrm{~g}\) piece of copper, which has one conduction electron per atem?

Consider a system of two identical objects heading straight toward each other. What would qualify and whit would disqualify the system as a thermodynamic system, and how, if at all. Would this relate to the elasticity of the collision'?

Equation \((9-27)\) gives the density of states for a system of oscillators but ignores spin. The result, simply one state per energy change of \(\hbar \omega_{0}\) between levels. is incorrect if particles are allowed diff erent spin states at each level. but modification to include spin is easy. From Chapter 8 , we know that a particle of spin s is allowed \(2 s+1\) spin orientations, so the number of states at each level is simply multiplied by this factor. Thus, $$ D(E)=(2 s+1) / \hbar \omega_{0} $$ (a) Using this density of states, the definition $$ \begin{array}{l} \text { Nheud }(2 s+1)=\delta, \text { and } \\ \qquad N=\int_{0}^{\infty} \mathcal{N}(E) D(E) d E \end{array} $$ calculate the parameter \(B\) in the Boltzmann distribution \((9-31)\) and show that the distribution can thus be tewritten as $$ \mathcal{N}(E)_{\text {Bolu }}=\frac{\varepsilon}{k_{\mathrm{B}} T} \frac{1}{e^{E / \mathrm{L}_{\mathrm{B}} T}} $$ (b) Algue that if \(k_{\mathrm{B}} T \gg \delta\), the occupation number is much less than I for all \(E\).

Consider a gas of atoms that might serve as a laser medium but that is in equilibrium, with no population inversions. A photon gas coexists with the atoms. Would a photon whose energy is precisely the difference between two atomic energy states be more likely to be absorbed or to induce a stimulated emission or neither? We expect that in equilibrium the numbers of atoms at different levels and the number of photons of a given energy should be stable. Is your answer compatible?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.