/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 11 The personnel manager of a manuf... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The personnel manager of a manufacturing plant claims that among the 400 employees, 312 got a pay rise last year, 248 got increased pension benefits, 173 got both and 43 got neither. Explain why this claim should be questioned.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The claims are inconsistent due to conflicting employee count totals.

Step by step solution

01

Set Definitions

Let us set the variables for ease of calculation. \( A \) represents the employees who received a pay rise, and \( B \) represents employees who received increased pension benefits.
02

Use Given Data

According to the claim: \( |A| = 312 \), \( |B| = 248 \), \( |A \cap B| = 173 \), and 43 employees received neither benefit.
03

Apply Inclusion-Exclusion Principle

The formula for total employees who received at least one benefit is given by \(|A \cup B| = |A| + |B| - |A \cap B|\). Substitute the given values to get \( |A \cup B| = 312 + 248 - 173 = 387 \).
04

Check Against Total Employees

According to the data, 43 employees received neither benefit. Hence, \(|A \cup B| = 400 - 43 = 357\).
05

Identify the Contradiction

The numbers calculated are inconsistent: \(|A \cup B| = 387\) should equal \(400 - 43 = 357\) but they don't. This discrepancy means not all claims by the personnel manager can be true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Set Theory
Set theory is a branch of mathematics dealing with collections of objects, known as sets. In our context, sets are used to categorize employees based on receiving certain benefits. A key operation in set theory is the union, represented by \( A \cup B \). This refers to the set of all elements that belong to either set \( A \) or set \( B \).
In the problem, we are given sets \( A \) and \( B \) to analyze how employees are distributed across the benefits. Set \( A \) includes those with a pay rise, and set \( B \) involves those with increased pension benefits. When solving the problem, understanding these sets' relationships helps assess the claim of the total number of employees receiving benefits.
Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning involves analyzing and evaluating a problem methodically to arrive at a valid conclusion. In examining the personnel manager’s claim, logical reasoning helps identify inconsistencies. We are provided with several employee groups: those who received neither benefit and those who received at least one benefit.
By implementing logical reasoning, we apply the Inclusion-Exclusion Principle. It combines the count of each individual group of employees and adjusts for overlaps, reducing double-counting. This reasoning enables us to logically deduce whether the claims are consistent with the total employee count.
Use logical steps:
  • Define all groups (i.e., pay rise, pension benefits, both, and neither).
  • Apply principles to adjust for overlaps.

  • Compare calculated totals against actuals to determine consistency.
Mathematical Proof
Mathematical proof is a process used to verify the truth of a statement. In this scenario, the proof involves verifying the accuracy of the personnel manager's statement using the Inclusion-Exclusion Principle.
By calculating \(|A \cup B| = |A| + |B| - |A \cap B|\), we determine the total number of employees who received at least one benefit. This calculated value, 387, contradicts the real world calculation of 357. Thus, we can show the claim must be questioned.
Steps in proof:
  • Calculate total benefits using the Inclusion-Exclusion Principle.
  • Compare with given values to see if there’s a discrepancy.
  • Conclude if statements hold based on mathematical findings.
Problem Solving
Problem solving bandages identifying misalignments or contradictions and adjusting to find a solution. This exercise exemplifies the necessity of attention to detail when combining mathematical principles with logical reasoning.
To interpret the manager's claim, the core process starts with translating real-world data into mathematical constructs. Next, apply the Inclusion-Exclusion Principle and verify calculations against the actual number of employees. The key to solving this problem lies in examining these results to spot any inconsistencies.
Tips for effective problem solving:
  • Clearly define all sets and variables before calculations.
  • Consistently cross-reference mathematical results with real-world data.
  • Embrace multiple perspectives to validate conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

During the repair of a large number of car engines it was found that part number 100 was changed in \(36 \%\) and part number 101 in \(42 \%\) of cases, and that both parts were changed in \(30 \%\) of cases. Is the replacement of part 100 connected with that of part \(101 ?\) Find the probability that in repairing an engine for which part 100 has been changed it will also be necessary to replace part 101 .

The shelf life (in hours) of a certain perishable packaged food is a random variable with density function $$ f_{X}(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{cl} 20000(x+100)^{-3} & (x>0) \\ 0 & \text { (otherwise) } \end{array}\right. $$ Find the probabilities that one of these packages will have a shelf life of (a) at least 200 hours; (b) at most 100 hours; (c) between 80 and 120 hours.

If there are 720 personal computers in an office building and they each break down independently with probability \(0.002\) per working day, use the Poisson approximation to the binomial distribution to find the probability that more than four of these computers will break down in any one working day,

The following data consists of percentage marks achieved by students sitting an examination: \(47,51,75,58,70,73,63,60,60,54,60\) \(67,50,60,74,69,51,67,49,66,61,46\), \(66,57,55,60,62,36,52,67,62,51,62\) \(62,59,52,75,44,75,56,52,64,63,59\) \(54,57,68,53,43,64,39,58,68,66,72\) \(46,58,52,50,45\) Draw histograms with (a) class boundaries at intervals of five, and (b) your own choice of class boundaries.

The time interval \((X)\) between successive earthquakes of a certain magnitude has an exponential distribution with density function given by $$ f_{X}(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{cc} \frac{1}{90} \mathrm{e}^{-x / 90} & \text { if } x \geqslant 0 \\ 0 & \text { if } x<0 \end{array}\right. $$ where \(x\) is measured in days. Find the probability that such an interval will not exceed 30 days.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.