/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 Show that the forms $$ x_{i_... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 7: Problem 12

Show that the forms $$ x_{i_{1}} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_{k}} \text {, where } 1 \leq i_{1}

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove that the given \(k\)-forms are linearly independent. Answer: We showed that assuming the basic \(k\)-forms as linearly dependent led to a contradiction when wedging the sum with \(x_n\). Therefore, the given basic \(k\)-forms must be linearly independent.

Step by step solution

01

Familiarize with wedge products and basic \(k\)-forms

Recall that the wedge product (\(\wedge\)) is a binary operation on the space of differential forms. It is anti-symmetric and associative, meaning: - \(x_i \wedge x_j = - x_j \wedge x_i\) for all \(i,j\) - \(x_i \wedge (x_j \wedge x_k) = (x_i \wedge x_j) \wedge x_k\) for all \(i,j,k\) The given exercise deals with basic \(k\)-forms which are of the form $$ x_{i_{1}} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_{k}} \text {, where } 1 \leq i_{1}<i_{2}<\cdots<i_{A} \leq n. $$
02

Assume they are linearly dependent and set up a linear combination

Suppose that these basic \(k\)-forms are linearly dependent. If so, there must exist non-zero coefficients \(c_{i_1,\ldots, i_k}\) such that: $$\sum_{1\leq i_1<\cdots<i_k\leq n} c_{i_1,\ldots, i_k} x_{i_1} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_k} = 0$$
03

Take a set of indices \((i_1^*,\ldots,i_k^*)\) as an example

Without loss of generality, consider the sets of indices with the highest \(i_k^*\). That is, \(i_k^* = n\). Now, let's consider wedging this equation with \(x_n\) to exploit antisymmetry: $$\sum_{1\leq i_1<\cdots<i_k\leq n} c_{i_1,\ldots, i_k} x_{i_1} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_k} \wedge x_n = 0 \wedge x_n = 0$$
04

Consider the term with the selected set of indices and others

In this sum, the terms can be split into two types: one with \(i_k'= n\) (our chosen highest index) and others with \(i_k'< n\). For the term with \(i_k'=n\) and arbitrary \(i_j'\)s, we have: $$c_{i_1^*,\ldots, i_{k-1}^*,n}(x_{i_1^*} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_{k-1}^*} \wedge x_n) \wedge x_n = 0$$ since \(x_n \wedge x_n = 0\) due to the antisymmetric property. For terms with \(i_k'<n\), we have: $$(x_{i_1'} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_k'})\wedge x_n = - (x_{i_1'} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_k'}\wedge x_n \wedge x_n) = x_{i_1'} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_k'} \wedge x_n$$ since again, \(x_n \wedge x_n = 0\).
05

Identify a contradiction

Following from Step 4, the entire equation becomes: $$\sum_{1\leq i_1<\cdots<i_k\leq n} c_{i_1,\ldots, i_k} x_{i_1} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_k} \wedge x_n = c_{i_1^*,\ldots,i_{k-1}^*,n} (x_{i_1^*} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_{k-1}^*} \wedge x_n) \wedge x_n + \sum_{1\leq i_1<\cdots<i_{k-1}<i_k<n} c_{i_1,\ldots, i_k} (x_{i_1} \wedge \cdots \wedge x_{i_k} \wedge x_n) = 0$$ However, the expression on the left is linearly dependent on the highest index \(x_n\), while the expression on the right doesn't have any terms containing \(x_n\). This is a contradiction, as there is no combination of coefficients \(c_{i_1,\ldots, i_k}\) that can make the equation hold.
06

Conclude that basic \(k\)-forms are linearly independent

Since our assumption of linear dependence led to a contradiction, the set of basic \(k\)-forms must be linearly independent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Calculate the value of the forms \(\omega_{1}=d x_{2} \wedge d x_{3}, \omega_{2}=x_{1} d x_{3} \wedge d x_{2}\), and \(\omega_{3}=d x_{3} \wedge d r^{2}\left(r^{2}=x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{2}+x_{3}^{2}\right)\), on the pair of vectors \(\xi=(1,1,1), \eta=(1,2,3)\) at the point \(\mathbf{x}=(2,0,0)\).

Show that the integral depends linearly on the form: $$ \int_{\sigma} \lambda_{1} \omega_{1}+\lambda_{2} \omega_{2}=\lambda_{1} \int_{\sigma} \omega_{1}+\lambda_{2} \int_{\theta} \omega_{2} . $$

Show that $$ \begin{aligned} \operatorname{div}[\mathbf{A}, \mathbf{B}] &=(\operatorname{curl} \mathbf{A}, \mathbf{B})-(\operatorname{curl} \mathbf{B}, \mathbf{A}), \\ \operatorname{curl} a \mathbf{A} &=\lfloor\operatorname{grad} a, \mathbf{A}]+a \text { curl } \mathbf{A}, \\ \operatorname{div} a \mathbf{A} &=(\operatorname{grad} a, \mathbf{A})+a \operatorname{div} \mathbf{A} . \end{aligned} $$

Show that every 2 -form on the \(n\)-dimensional space with coordinates \(x_{1}, \ldots, x_{n}\) can be uniquely represented in the form $$ \omega)^{2}=\sum_{i

Show that \(\omega_{1} \wedge \cdots \wedge \omega_{k}\) is a \(k\)-form.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

Medical Physics

Read Explanation

Linear Momentum

Read Explanation

Quantum Physics

Read Explanation

Conservation of Energy and Momentum

Read Explanation

Dynamics

Read Explanation

Solid State Physics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.