/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 This problem is designed to guid... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

This problem is designed to guide you through a "proof" of Plancherel's theorem, by starting with the theory of ordinary Fourier series on a finite interval, and allowing that interval to expand to infinity. (a) Dirichlet's theorem says that "any" function \(f(x)\) on the interval \([-a,+a]\) can be expanded as a Fourier series: $$f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left[a_{n} \sin \left(\frac{n \pi x}{a}\right)+b_{n} \cos \left(\frac{n \pi x}{a}\right)\right].$$ Show that this can be written equivalently as $$f(x)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} c_{n} e^{i n \pi x / a}.$$ What is \(c_{n},\) in terms of \(a_{n}\) and \(b_{n} ?\) (b) Show (by appropriate modification of Fourier's trick) that $$c_{n}=\frac{1}{2 a} \int_{-a}^{+a} f(x) e^{-i n \pi x / a} d x.$$ (c) Eliminate \(n\) and \(c_{n}\) in favor of the new variables \(k=(n \pi / a)\) and \(F(k)=\sqrt{2 / \pi} a c_{n} .\) Show that \((\mathrm{a})\) and \((\mathrm{b})\) now become $$f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} F(k) e^{i k x} \Delta k ; \quad F(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{-a}^{+a} f(x) e^{-i k x} d x, $$ where \(\Delta k\) is the increment in \(k\) from one \(n\) to the next. (d) Take the limit \(a \rightarrow \infty\) to obtain Plancherel's theorem. Comment: In view of their quite different origins, it is surprising (and delightful) that the two formulas-one for \(F(k)\) in terms of \(f(x),\) the other for \(f(x)\) in terms of \(F(k)-\) have such a similar structure in the limit \(a \rightarrow \infty.\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Transform the trigonometric Fourier series into a complex exponential form; (b) Derive coefficients via integration; (c) Change variables for continuous form; (d) Use limits to describe Plancherel's theorem.

Step by step solution

01

Fourier Series Representation

We start with the Fourier series representation of the function, given by Dirichlet's theorem: \[ f(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \left(a_n \sin\left(\frac{n \pi x}{a}\right) + b_n \cos\left(\frac{n \pi x}{a}\right)\right) \] This series can also be expressed in terms of complex exponentials: \[ f(x) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} c_n e^{i n \pi x / a} \] To do this, recognize that \( \sin \theta = \frac{e^{i\theta} - e^{-i\theta}}{2i} \) and \( \cos \theta = \frac{e^{i\theta} + e^{-i\theta}}{2} \). Thus, \( c_n \) can be expressed in terms of \( a_n \) and \( b_n \) as follows:\[ c_n = \begin{cases} \frac{b_n}{2} - \frac{a_n}{2i}, & n > 0 \ \frac{b_n}{2} + \frac{a_n}{2i}, & n < 0 \end{cases} \] Note that for \( n = 0 \), it is comprised solely of \( b_n \), i.e., \( c_0 = b_0 \).
02

Calculate Coefficients with Fourier's Trick

Use Fourier's trick to determine the coefficients \(c_n\). Start by multiplying both sides of the series by \(e^{-i m\pi x / a}\) and integrating over \([-a, a]\):\[ \int_{-a}^{a} f(x) e^{-i m\pi x / a} dx = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} c_n \int_{-a}^{a} e^{i(n-m)\pi x / a} dx \] Due to orthogonality, \[ \int_{-a}^{a} e^{i(n-m)\pi x / a} dx \] is \(2a\) if \(n = m\) and 0 otherwise. Therefore, \[ c_n = \frac{1}{2a} \int_{-a}^{a} f(x) e^{-i n\pi x / a} dx \] This formula shows how \(c_n\) relates to the function \(f(x)\) on the interval.
03

Change Variables for Continuous Limit

We change the variables to new variables \( k = \frac{n\pi}{a} \) and \( F(k) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}} a c_n \). This results in the following transformation for (a) and (b): \[ f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} F(k) e^{i k x} \Delta k \] where \( \Delta k = \frac{\pi}{a} \), giving the spacing between successive \(k\). Also,\[ F(k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-a}^{a} f(x) e^{-i k x} dx \] This prepares the expression for the limit transition.
04

Take Limit as Interval Expands

Finally, take the limit \(a \rightarrow \infty\): As \(a\) increases, the interval expands to \([-\infty, \infty]\), making the summation approach an integral. Hence (a) becomes:\[ f(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} F(k) e^{i k x} dk \] And (b) provides:\[ F(k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x) e^{-i k x} dx \] This result is Plancherel's theorem, which emphasizes the symmetry and elegance of the Fourier transform.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Fourier Series
A Fourier series is a way to represent a function as an infinite sum of sines and cosines. This powerful mathematical tool helps in analyzing the frequencies present in a periodic function. In simple terms, any periodic signal can be broken down into a combination of simple oscillating functions, specifically sines and cosines.

Dirichlet's theorem extends this representation to include all functions on the interval [-a, +a], thereby forming a Fourier series which expresses the function as:
  • \(f(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \left(a_n \sin\left(\frac{n \pi x}{a}\right) + b_n \cos\left(\frac{n \pi x}{a}\right)\right)\)
This equation indicates how each part of the signal corresponds to a particular sine or cosine wave, determined by coefficients \(a_n\) and \(b_n\). By transforming this with complex exponentials, any function can be similarly expressed using a more compact form as a sum of exponential terms, laying groundwork for Plancherel's theorem.
Dirichlet's Theorem
Dirichlet's theorem plays a fundamental role when working with Fourier series by affirming that any function defined over a finite interval [-a, +a] can be expressed as a Fourier series. This theorem provides assurance that the series representation using sines and cosines is valid for almost any function within this interval.

This theorem advances analyses by introducing conditions where functions can be faithfully represented through oscillatory components, forming the base of all Fourier series approaches. The translation of the Fourier series into complex exponentials through Dirichlet's theorem:
  • \(f(x) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} c_n e^{i n \pi x / a}\)
offers an alternate yet mathematically equivalent view of decomposing functions, integral to understanding more complex forms like those that appear in signal processing and engineering fields.
Complex Exponentials
Complex exponentials are extensions of exponential functions, incorporating imaginary numbers to express trigonometric functions in exponential form. They are key to simplifying the representation of oscillatory behaviors in the Fourier series.

By utilizing Euler's formula, which relates complex exponentials to trigonometric functions:
  • \(e^{i\theta} = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta\)
you can transform sines and cosines into exponential terms. This transformation is powerful as it allows Fourier series to denote functions using the formula:
  • \(f(x) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} c_n e^{i n \pi x / a}\)
where the coefficients \(c_n\) relate to corresponding real-valued coefficients for sine and cosine. Employing complex notation facilitates analysis and integration, particularly within disciplines involving wave mechanics or electronics.
Orthogonality in Fourier Analysis
Orthogonality is a crucial concept in Fourier analysis, indicating that two functions are orthogonal if their inner product equals zero. In the context of Fourier series, orthogonality simplifies the calculation of the series coefficients.

For example, sine and cosine components are orthogonal over any interval that is a multiple of their period, providing that their overlapping contribution towards the inner products:
  • \(\int_{-a}^{a} \sin(m \theta) \cos(n \theta) \, d\theta = 0\)
are zero.

This intrinsic property is exploited in deriving the coefficients using techniques such as "Fourier's Trick." It allows each component in the series to accurately capture distinct aspects of the original function without interference, therefore enabling the reconstruction of the signal through its constituent orthogonal parts—crucial in proving and applying Plancherel's theorem.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If two (or more) distinct \(^{56}\) solutions to the (time-independent) Schrödinger equation have the same energy \(E,\) these states are said to be degenerate. For example, the free particle states are doubly degenerate- one solution representing motion to the right, and the other motion to the left. But we have never encountered normalizable degenerate solutions, and this is no accident. Prove the following theorem: In one dimension \(^{57}\) \((-\infty

In this problem you will show that the number of nodes of the stationary states of a one-dimensional potential always increases with energy. Consider two (real, normalized) solutions \(\left(\psi_{n} \text { and } \psi_{m}\) ) to the time- \right. independent Schrödinger equation (for a given potential \(V(x)\) ), with energies \(E_{n}>E_{m}\) (a) Show that $$\frac{d}{d x}\left(\frac{d \psi_{m}}{d x} \psi_{n}-\psi_{m} \frac{d \psi_{n}}{d x}\right)=\frac{2 m}{\hbar^{2}}\left(E_{n}-E_{m}\right) \psi_{m} \psi_{n}$$ (b) Let \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) be two adjacent nodes of the function \(\psi_{m}(x) .\) Show that $$\psi_{m}^{\prime}\left(x_{2}\right) \psi_{n}\left(x_{2}\right)-\psi_{m}^{\prime}\left(x_{1}\right) \psi_{n}\left(x_{1}\right)=\frac{2 m}{\hbar^{2}}\left(E_{n}-E_{m}\right) \int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}} \psi_{m} \psi_{n} d x$$ (c) If \(\psi_{n}(x)\) has no nodes between \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2},\) then it must have the same sign everywhere in the interval. Show that (b) then leads to a contradiction. Therefore, between every pair of nodes of \(\psi_{m}(x), \psi_{n}(x)\) must have at least one node, and in particular the number of nodes increases with energy.

Evaluate the following integrals: (a) \(\int_{-3}^{+1}\left(x^{3}-3 x^{2}+2 x-1\right) \delta(x+2) d x.\) (b) \(\int_{0}^{\infty}[\cos (3 x)+2] \delta(x-\pi) d x.\) (c) \(\int_{-1}^{+1} \exp (|x|+3) \delta(x-2) d x.\)

In this problem we explore some of the more useful theorems (stated without proof) involving Hermite polynomials. (a) The Rodrigues formula says that $$H_{n}(\xi)=(-1)^{n} e^{\xi^{2}}\left(\frac{d}{d \xi}\right)^{n} e^{-\xi^{2}}.$$ Use it to derive \(H_{3}\) and \(H_{4}.\) (b) The following recursion relation gives you \(H_{n+1}\) in terms of the two preceding Hermite polynomials: $$H_{n+1}(\xi)=2 \xi H_{n}(\xi)-2 n H_{n-1}(\xi).$$ Use it, together with your answer in (a), to obtain \(H_{5}\) and \(H_{6}\). (c) If you differentiate an \(n\) th-order polynomial, you get a polynomial of order \((n-1) .\) For the Hermite polynomials, in fact, $$\frac{d H_{n}}{d \xi}=2 n H_{n-1}(\xi).$$ Check this, by differentiating \(H_{5}\) and \(H_{6}\). (d) \(H_{n}(\xi)\) is the \(n\) th \(z\) -derivative, at \(z=0\), of the generating function \(\exp \left(-z^{2}+2 z \xi\right) ;\) or, to put it another way, it is the coefficient of \(z^{n} / n !\) in the Taylor series expansion for this function: $$e^{-z^{2}+2 z \xi}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{z^{n}}{n !} H_{n}(\xi).$$ Use this to obtain \(H_{1}, H_{2},\) and \(H_{3}.\)

The Boltzmann equation \(^{68}\) $$P(n)=\frac{1}{Z} e^{-\beta E_{n}}, \quad Z \equiv \sum_{n} e^{-\beta E_{n}}, \quad \beta \equiv \frac{1}{k_{B} T}$$ gives the probability of finding a system in the state \(n\) (with energy \(E_{n}\) ), at temperature \(T (k_{B}\) is Boltzmann's constant). Note: The probability here refers to the random thermal distribution, and has nothing to do with quantum indeterminacy. Quantum mechanics will only enter this problem through quantization of the energies \(E_{n}\) (a) Show that the thermal average of the system's energy can be written as $$\bar{E}=\sum_{n} E_{n} P(n)=-\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \ln (Z)$$ (b) For a quantum simple harmonic oscillator the index \(n\) is the familiar quantum number, and \(E_{n}=(n+1 / 2) \hbar \omega .\) Show that in this case the partition function \(Z\) is $$Z=\frac{e^{-\beta \hbar \omega / 2}}{1-e^{-\beta \hbar \omega}}$$ You will need to sum a geometric series. Incidentally, for a classical simple harmonic oscillator it can be shown that \(Z\) classical \(=2 \pi /(\omega \beta)\) (c) Use your results from parts (a) and (b) to show that for the quantum oscillator $$\bar{E}=\left(\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}\right) \frac{1+e^{-\beta \hbar \omega}}{1-e^{-\beta \hbar \omega}}$$ For a classical oscillator the same reasoning would give \(\bar{E}_{\text {classical }}=1 / \beta=k_{B} T\) (d) Acrystal consisting of \(N\) atoms can be thought of as a collection of \(3 N\) oscillators (each atom is attached by springs to its 6 nearest neighbors, along the \(x, y,\) and \(z\) directions, but those springs are shared by the atoms at the two ends). The heat capacity of the crystal (per atom) will therefore be $$C=3 \frac{\partial \bar{E}}{\partial T}$$ Show that (in this model) $$C=3 k_{B}\left(\frac{\theta_{E}}{T}\right)^{2} \frac{e^{\theta_{E} / T}}{\left(e^{\theta_{E} / T}-1\right)^{2}}$$ where \(\theta_{E} \equiv \hbar \omega / k_{B}\) is the so-called Einstein temperature. The same reasoning using the classical expression for \(\bar{E}\) yields \(C_{\text {classical }}=3 k_{B}\) independent of temperature. (e) Sketch the graph of \(C / k_{B}\) versus \(T / \theta_{E} .\) Your result should look something like the data for diamond in Figure 2.24 , and nothing like the classical prediction.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.