/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q7P Apply the techniques of this Sec... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Apply the techniques of this Section to the H-and Li+ions (each has two electrons, like helium, but nuclear charges Z=1and Z=3, respectively). Find the effective (partially shielded) nuclear charge, and determine the best upper bound on Egs, for each case. Comment: In the case of H- you should find that (H)>-13.6eV, which would appear to indicate that there is no bound state at all, since it would be energetically favourable for one electron to fly off, leaving behind a neutral hydrogen atom. This is not entirely surprising, since the electrons are less strongly attracted to the nucleus than they are in helium, and the electron repulsion tends to break the atom apart. However, it turns out to be incorrect. With a more sophisticated trial wave function (see Problem 7.18) it can be shown that Egs<-13.6eVand hence that a bound state does exist. It's only barely bound however, and there are no excited bound states, soH- has no discrete spectrum (all transitions are to and from the continuum). As a result, it is difficult to study in the laboratory, although it exists in great abundance on the surface of the sun.

Short Answer

Expert verified

For H-effective charge and estimate on energy of ground state are:

Z=0.688(H)min=-12.85ev

For Li-effective charge and estimate on energy of ground state are:

Z=2.688

Hmin=-196.456eV

Step by step solution

01

Definition of electron repulsion.

The idea that electron pairs in a ring around a central atom will want to stay as far apart as feasible. The shape of a molecule or a polyatomic ion is predicted using electron pair repulsion.

02

For H-and Li+effective charge and estimate on energy of ground state.

The only difference from helium atom is that in equation 7.28 , in last parenthesis

instead of 2 , put Z'. Z'=1for H and Z'=2forLi+ .

Now equation 7.32 becomes:

H=2Z2-4ZZ-Z'-54ZE1=-2Z2+4ZZ'54ZE1=HZ=0n-4Z+4Z'-54=0

Z=Z'-516.Hmin=2Z'-5162-4Z'-516Z'-516-Z-54Z'-516E1=2Z'2-54Z'+25128+54Z'-516-Z'2564E1=2Z'2-54Z'+25128E1

forH-Z'=1effectivechargeandestimateonengryofgroundstate,Z=1-516=0.688Hmin=0.945E1=-12.85eVforLi+Z'=3effectivechargeandestimateonenergyofgroundstate,Z=3-516=2.688Hmin=14.445E1=196.45eV

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Evaluate Dand X(Equations and ). Check your answers against Equations 7.47and 7.48.

Find the best bound on Egsfor the delta-function potentialV(x)=-(x), using a triangular trial function (Equation 7.10, only centered at the origin). This time a is an adjustable parameter.

Using Egs=-79.0eV for the ground state energy of helium, calculate the ionization energy (the energy required to remove just one electron). Hint: First calculate the ground state energy of the helium ion, He+, with a single electron orbiting the nucleus; then subtract the two energies.

Suppose we used a minus sign in our trial wave function (Equation 7.37):=A[0(r1)-0(r2)]): Without doing any new integrals, find F(x) (the analog to Equation ) for this case, and construct the graph. Show that there is no evidence of bonding. (Since the variational principle only gives an upper bound, this doesn't prove that bonding cannot occur for such a state, but it certainly doesn't look promising). Comment: Actually, any function of the form =A[0(r1)+ei蠒蠄0(r2)]has the desired property that the electron is equally likely to be associated with either proton. However, since the Hamiltonian (Equation 7.35 ) is invariant under the interchange P:r1r2 , its eigen functions can be chosen to be simultaneously eigen functions of P . The plus sign (Equation 7.37) goes with the eigenvalue +1 , and the minus sign (Equation 7.52 ) with the eigenvalue -1 ; nothing is to be gained by considering the ostensibly more general case (Equation 7.53), though you're welcome to try it, if you're interested.

The fundamental problem in harnessing nuclear fusion is getting the two particles (say, two deuterons) close enough together for the attractive (but short-range) nuclear force to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. The 鈥渂ulldozer鈥 method is to heat the particles up to fantastic temperatures and allow the random collisions to bring them together. A more exotic proposal is muon catalysis, in which we construct a 鈥渉ydrogen molecule ion,鈥 only with deuterons in place of protons, and a muon in place of the electron. Predict the equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons in such a structure, and explain why muons are superior to electrons for this purpose.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.