/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q5P a) Use the variational principle... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

a) Use the variational principle to prove that first-order non-degenerate perturbation theory always overestimates (or at any rate never underestimates) the ground state energy.

(b) In view of (a), you would expect that the second-order correction to the ground state is always negative. Confirm that this is indeed the case, by examining Equation 6.15.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) As, gs0|H|gs0=E0+E1Egsthis proves thatfirst-order non-degenerate perturbation theory overestimates the ground state energy.

(b) The value of Egs2is definitely negative.

Step by step solution

01

Define the variational principle

The variational principle states that the ground-state energy is always smaller than or equal to the calculated with the trial wavefunction expectation value. We can approximate the wave function and energy of the ground-state by changing until the expectation value of is minimized.

Egsgso|H|gso

WhereEgs is the energy in the ground state.

02

Prove the first-order perturbation

(a)

Solve the problem by using gso as our trial wave function as:

The variational principle tells us that:

Egsgso|H|gso

Using the perturbation theory as well;

H=H0+H1

Where H1 is the first order perturbation, and His the unperturbed Hamiltonian.

Thus,

gs0|H|gs0=gs0|H|gs0+gs0|H1|gs0gs0|H|gs0=Egs0gs0|H1|gs0=Egs1

Then, gs0|H|gs0=E0+E1Egsand this proves the statement.

03

Define the value of second order correction.

(b)

The ground state's second order correction is denoted by Egs2 and from the second order perturbation theory,

Egs0=mn|m0|H1|gs0|2En0-Em0

Therefore;

role="math" localid="1658317167106" Egs0=mgs|m0|H1|gs0|2Egs0-Em0

Since role="math" localid="1658317017097" Egs0 is the ground state,

Then numerator is positive, but the denominator is negative as:

Egs0-Em0<0 for all m.

Thus, role="math" localid="1658316906095" |m0|H1|gs0|2, Egs2is definitely negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose we used a minus sign in our trial wave function (Equation 7.37):=A[0(r1)-0(r2)]): Without doing any new integrals, find F(x) (the analog to Equation ) for this case, and construct the graph. Show that there is no evidence of bonding. (Since the variational principle only gives an upper bound, this doesn't prove that bonding cannot occur for such a state, but it certainly doesn't look promising). Comment: Actually, any function of the form =A[0(r1)+ei蠒蠄0(r2)]has the desired property that the electron is equally likely to be associated with either proton. However, since the Hamiltonian (Equation 7.35 ) is invariant under the interchange P:r1r2 , its eigen functions can be chosen to be simultaneously eigen functions of P . The plus sign (Equation 7.37) goes with the eigenvalue +1 , and the minus sign (Equation 7.52 ) with the eigenvalue -1 ; nothing is to be gained by considering the ostensibly more general case (Equation 7.53), though you're welcome to try it, if you're interested.

Use a gaussian trial function (Equation 7.2) to obtain the lowest upper bound you can on the ground state energy of (a) the linear potential V(x)=|x| (b) the quartic potential:V(x)=x4

(a) GeneralizeProblem 7.2, using the trial wave function

(x)=A(x2+b2)n,

For arbitrary n. Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300238725" b2=hm[n(4n-1)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2

(b) Find the least upper bound on the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator using a trial function of the form

(x)=Bx(x2+b2)n.

Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300555415" b2=hm[n(4n-5)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2.

(c) Notice that the bounds approach the exact energies as n 鈫掆垶. Why is that? Hint: Plot the trial wave functions for n = 2 , n = 3 , and n = 4, and compare them with the true wave functions (Equations 2.59 and 2.62). To do it analytically, start with the identity

ez=limn(1+zn)n0(x)=(mh)1/4e-m2hx2 (2.59).

1(x)=A1a^+0=A12hm(-hddx+mx)(mh)1/4e-m2hx21(x)=A1(mh)1/42mhxe-m2hx2(2.62).

Evaluate Dand X(Equations and ). Check your answers against Equations 7.47and 7.48.

The fundamental problem in harnessing nuclear fusion is getting the two particles (say, two deuterons) close enough together for the attractive (but short-range) nuclear force to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. The 鈥渂ulldozer鈥 method is to heat the particles up to fantastic temperatures and allow the random collisions to bring them together. A more exotic proposal is muon catalysis, in which we construct a 鈥渉ydrogen molecule ion,鈥 only with deuterons in place of protons, and a muon in place of the electron. Predict the equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons in such a structure, and explain why muons are superior to electrons for this purpose.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.