/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q20P Quantum dots. Consider a particl... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Quantum dots. Consider a particle constrained to move in two dimensions in the cross-shaped region.The 鈥渁rms鈥 of the cross continue out to infinity. The potential is zero within the cross, and infinite in the shaded areas outside. Surprisingly, this configuration admits a positive-energy bound state

(a) Show that the lowest energy that can propagate off to infinity is

Ethreshold=2h28ma2

any solution with energy less than that has to be a bound state. Hint: Go way out one arm (say xa), and solve the Schr枚dinger equation by separation of variables; if the wave function propagates out to infinity, the dependence on x must take the formexp(ikxx)withkx>0

(b) Now use the variation principle to show that the ground state has energy less than Ethreshold. Use the following trial wave function (suggested by Jim Mc Tavish):

(x,y)=A{cos(蟺虫/2a)+cos(蟺测/2a)e-xaandyacos(x/2a)e-y/axaandy>acos(y/2a)e-y/ax.aandya0elsewhere

Normalize it to determine A, and calculate the expectation value of H.
Answer:

<H>=h2ma2[28-1-(/4)1+(8/2)+(1/2)]

Now minimize with respect to 伪, and show that the result is less thanEthreshold. Hint: Take full advantage of the symmetry of the problem鈥 you only need to integrate over 1/8 of the open region, since the other seven integrals will be the same. Note however that whereas the trial wave function is continuous, its derivatives are not鈥攖here are 鈥渞oof-lines鈥 at the joins, and you will need to exploit the technique of Example 8.3.

Short Answer

Expert verified

aEmin=h228ma2=1.234h2ma2bHmin=1.058h2ma2

Step by step solution

01

(a) Showing the lowest energy that can propagate off to infinity

The lowest Energy that can propagate off to infinity

-h22m2x2+2y2=E

Let

localid="1658386907422" (x,y)=X(x)Y(y).Yd2Xdx2+Xd2Ydy2=-2mEh2XY;1Xd2Xdx2+1Yd2Ydy2=-2mEh2d2Xdx2=-Kx2X;d2Ydy2=-ky2Ykx2+ky2=2mEh2

The general solution to the y equation is Y(y)=Acoskyy+Bsinkyy; the boundary conditions localid="1658387119190" Y(a)=0yieldky=n2awith minimum 2a.

[Note that ky2has to be positive, or you cannot meet the boundary conditions at all.]

So Eh22mkx2+24a2.

For a traveling wave kx2has to be positive. Conclusion: Any solution with E<2h28ma2will be a bound state.

02

(a) The ground state has energy less than Ethreshold

Here鈥檚 a graph of (x,y):

a=0.90.9gx-,y-=Piecewise(Cos蟺虫/2+Cos蟺测/2)e^(-a),Absx<1Absy<1,(cos蟺虫/2e^(-aAbsy),Absx<1Absy>1,Plot3D[gx,y,x,-4,4,y,-4,4,PlotRange,085].

It has roof-lines along the edges of the central square, as you can see by plotting g[x; 0.5] across the kink:

jx-:=gx,.5:=gx,.5.Plotjx,x,.8,1,2].

To normalize, we integrate (x,y)22 over regions I and II (in the figure), and multiply by 8.

lii=A2x-ay-0acos2蟺测2ae-2x/adxdy.li=12A2x-ay-0acos蟺虫2a+cosy2a2e-2dxdy.=12A2e-220acos2蟺虫2adx0ady+20acos蟺虫2adx0acos蟺虫2ady.=A2e-2a2a+2asin蟺虫2a0a2=A2a22e-21+82.

Normalizing:

1=8ll+ln=8A2a2e-214+121+82=4A2a2e-21+82+12So,A2=e24a21+82+12.

Next, ignoring the roof-lines for the moment, we calculate Ha=-8h22mJl+Jll, where

Jii=A2x-ay-0acos蟺测2ae-x/a2x2+2y2cos蟺测2ae-x/adxdy=a2-2a2lll=A2142-24e-2.Jl=12A2x-ay-0acosx2a+cos蟺测2ae-2x2+2y2cosx2a+cos蟺测2ae-dxdy=-24a2ll=-A21+28e-2

So far them,

Ha=-8h22m-A21+28e-2+A2142+24e-2=h22mA2e-28+2-2+22

Now the roof-lines, along the four sides of the central square: Hb=-8h22mJlll, where

Jlll=x=a-a+oy=0a(x,y)2x2(x,y)dxdy.=Ay=0a(a,y)xcos蟺测2ae-x/ax=a-xcos蟺测2ae-x=ady.=A2y=0acos蟺测2ae--acos蟺测2ae-+2asin2e-dy.=A21ae-20a2cos蟺测2a-cos2蟺测2ady=A2e-21-2.Hb=-8h22mA2e-21-2S0,=h22mA2e-24(-2)

Putting it all together,

H=Ha+Hb=h22mA2e-28+2-2+22+h22mA2e-2(4-8)=h2ma228-1-/41+(8/2)+(1/2)

Minimizing:

dHd=0dd4-1+(8/2)+(1/2)2=0-11+(8/2)+(1/2)-4-(1+(8/2)+(1/2))2-122;1+(8/2)+(1/2)-4-22=0;21+82+-2;=11+81+(8/2)21+(8/2)=-1+9+(8/)221+(8/2).

(Note that 伪 must be positive)

03

(b) The ground state

Putting all together.

H=-2h2e-23mA2+2h2e-2mA2+2h2e-2mA2+2h2(2-1)e-23mA2n=2h2e-23m(2+2+3)A2=3h2ma22+2+36+11dHd=03h2ma2(2+2).(6+11)-11.(2+2+3)(6+11)2=0(2+2).(6+11)-11.(2+2+3)=012+222+12+22-112-22-33=0112+12-21=01,2=-12144+92422

Because has to be positive, we have Now, minimum of expected value of Hamiltonian is:

Hmin=h2ma2-3(2+2+3)6+11=1.058h2ma2

Therefore

a)Ethreshold=28h2ma2=1.2337h2ma2b)Hmin=1.058h2ma2,whichislessthanEmin

That means that particle won't escape to infinity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose we used a minus sign in our trial wave function (Equation 7.37):=A[0(r1)-0(r2)]): Without doing any new integrals, find F(x) (the analog to Equation ) for this case, and construct the graph. Show that there is no evidence of bonding. (Since the variational principle only gives an upper bound, this doesn't prove that bonding cannot occur for such a state, but it certainly doesn't look promising). Comment: Actually, any function of the form =A[0(r1)+ei蠒蠄0(r2)]has the desired property that the electron is equally likely to be associated with either proton. However, since the Hamiltonian (Equation 7.35 ) is invariant under the interchange P:r1r2 , its eigen functions can be chosen to be simultaneously eigen functions of P . The plus sign (Equation 7.37) goes with the eigenvalue +1 , and the minus sign (Equation 7.52 ) with the eigenvalue -1 ; nothing is to be gained by considering the ostensibly more general case (Equation 7.53), though you're welcome to try it, if you're interested.

Evaluate Dand X(Equations and ). Check your answers against Equations 7.47and 7.48.

Suppose you鈥檙e given a two-level quantum system whose (time-independent) Hamiltonian H0admits just two Eigen states, a (with energy Ea ), and b(with energy Eb ). They are orthogonal, normalized, and non-degenerate (assume Ea is the smaller of the two energies). Now we turn on a perturbation H鈥, with the following matrix elements:

a|H'|a=b|H'|b=0;a|H'|b=b|H'|a (7.74).

where h is some specified constant.

(a) Find the exact Eigen values of the perturbed Hamiltonian.

(b) Estimate the energies of the perturbed system using second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Estimate the ground state energy of the perturbed system using the variation principle, with a trial function of the form

=(肠辞蝉蠒)a+(蝉颈苍蠒)b (7.75).

where 蠒 is an adjustable parameter. Note: Writing the linear combination in this way is just a neat way to guarantee that 蠄 is normalized.

(d) Compare your answers to (a), (b), and (c). Why is the variational principle so accurate, in this case?

If the photon had a nonzero mass m0, the Coulomb potential would be replaced by the Yukawa potential,

V(r)=-e240e-rr (8.73).

Where=mc/ . With a trial wave function of your own devising, estimate the binding energy of a 鈥渉ydrogen鈥 atom with this potential. Assumea1 , and give your answer correct to order(a)2 .

InProblem 7.7we found that the trial wave function with shielding (Equation 7.27), which worked well for helium, is inadequate to confirm the existence of a bound state for the negative hydrogen ion.

1(r1,r2)z3a3e-z(r1+r2)/a (7.27)

Chandrasekhar used a trial wave function of the form

(r1,r2)A[1(r1)2(r2)+2(r1)1(r2)] (7.62).

Where

1(r)z13蟺补3e-z1/a,1(r)z23a3e-z2/a,(7.63)

In effect, he allowed two different shielding factors, suggesting that one electron is relatively close to the nucleus, and the other is farther out. (Because electrons are identical particles, the spatial wave function must be symmetries with respect to interchange. The spin state鈥攚hich is irrelevant to the calculation鈥攊s evidently anti symmetric.) Show that by astute choice of the adjustable parameters Z1and Z2you can get<H>less than -13.6.

Answer: :<H>=E1x6+y6(-x8+2x7+12x6y2-12x5y2-18x3y4+118xy6-12y8).

Wherexz1+z2.y2z1z2Chandrasekhar usedZ1=1.039

(Since this is larger than 1, the motivating interpretation as an effective nuclear charge cannot be sustained, but never mindit鈥檚 still an acceptable trial wave function) andZ2=0.283.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.