/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q12P Show that<X>=鈭*(-hi鈭... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Show that

<X>=*(-hip)桅诲辫.

Hint: Notice thatxexp(ipx/h)=-ih(d/dp)exp(ip/h).

In momentum space, then, the position operator is ih/p . More generally,

<Q(x,p)={*Q^}(x,hix)蠄诲虫,inpositionspace;*Q^}(-hip,p)桅诲辫,inmomentumspace.In principle you can do all calculations in momentum space just as well (though not always as easily) as in position space.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The provex=*-hip桅诲辫.

Step by step solution

01

Concept used

The coordination representation:

x=12h-eipx/hpdp

02

Given information from question

The transformation laws between coordinate space and momentum space. Because a Fourier transform connects the two bases, the coordinate representation is as follows:

x=12h-eipx/hpdp 鈥︹. (1)

Now we may try to describe the anticipated value of the position in momentum space for the provided wave function. We start by a definition of the expectation value

<x^>=*x虫蠄xdx=12h-eipx/hpdpdx 鈥︹. (2)

We can notice that we can express xe-ipx/has following:

x=-ihddpeipx/h

As a result, the part of the following integral in the previous statement can be simplified as:

localid="1656314346606" xeipx/hpdp=--ihddpeipx/hpdpIntegratingbyparts,weget,--ihddpeipx/hpdp=ih-eipx/hddppdpInsertthevaluesintoexpression(2),weget,=ih12he-ipx/hddppeipx/h*pdpdpdx=i2eixp-pIhddpeipx/h*pdpdpdx

We can see that the previous form reminds us of the delta function, however to obtain the right form we need to use a substitution z=x/hdz=dx/hThen, the expression becomes:

=ih12eip-pdzddpp*pdpdp=ihddpp*pp-pdpdp=*pihddppdp=x^

We proved that the position operator in momentum representation is given as stated in the problem. It's noteworthy that the momentum operator in position space is identical to the momentum operator. The reason for this is that position and momentum are both conjugate variables.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the matrix elements <n|x|n'>补颅颅颅颅苍诲 <n|p|n'>in the (orthonormal) basis of stationary states for the harmonic oscillator (Equation 2.67). You already calculated the "diagonal" elements (n=n') in Problem 2.12; use the same technique for the general case. Construct the corresponding (infinite) matrices, X and P . Show that(1/2m)P2+(尘蝇2/2)X2=His diagonal, in this basis. Are its diagonal elements what you would expect? Partial answer:

<n|x|n'>=h2m(n'n,n'-1+nn,n'-1)

(a) For a function f(x)that can be expanded in a Taylor series, show that f(x+x0)=eip^x0Ihf(x)

wherex_{0}

is any constant distance). For this reason, p^/his called the generator of translations in space. Note: The exponential of an operator is defined by the power series expansion: eQ^1+Q^+(1/2)Q^2+(1/3!)Q^3+...

(b) If (x,t)satisfies the (time-dependent) Schr枚dinger equation, show that (x,t+t0)=e-iH^t0/h(x,t)

where t_{0}is any constant time); -H^/his called the generator of translations in time.

(c) Show that the expectation value of a dynamical variableQ(x,p,t), at time , t+t0can be written34

<Q>t+t0=<x,t|eiH^t0/hQ^x^,p^,t+t0e-iH^t0/h|x,t>

Use this to recover Equation 3.71. Hint: Lett0=dt, and expand to first order in dt.

(a) Prove the following commutator identity:

[AB.C]=A[B.C]+[A.C]B

b) Show that

[xn,p]=ihnxn-1

(c) Show more generally that

[f(x),p]=ihdfdx

for any functionf(x).

Show that the energy-time uncertainty principle reduces to the "your name" uncertainty principle (Problem 3.14), when the observable in question is x.

Coherent states of the harmonic oscillator. Among the stationary states of the harmonic oscillator (Equation 2.67) only n = 0 hits the uncertainty limit (xp=h/2); in general, xp=(2n+1)h/2, as you found in Problem 2.12. But certain linear combinations (known as coherent states) also minimize the uncertainty product. They are (as it turns out) Eigen functions of the lowering operator

n=1n!(a^+)n0(2.68).

a_|>=|a>(the Eigen value 伪 can be any complex number).

(a)Calculate <x>,<x2>,<p>,<p2>in the state |伪鈱. Hint: Use the technique in Example 2.5, and remember that is the Hermitian conjugate of a-. Do not assume 伪 is real.

(b) Find x; show that xp=h/2.

(c) Like any other wave function, a coherent state can be expanded in terms of energy Eigen states: |>=n=0Cn|n>.

Show that the expansion coefficients arecn=nn!c0.

(d) Determine by normalizing |伪鈱. Answer: exp(-2/2)

(e) Now put in the time dependence: |n>e-iEntIh|n>,

and show that |t|remains an Eigen state of a-, but the Eigen value evolves in time:(t)=e-it So a coherent state stays coherent, and continues to minimize the uncertainty product.

(f) Is the ground state (n=0>)itself a coherent state? If so, what is the Eigen value?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.