/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Find the eigenvalues and eigenve... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the following matrix: $$\mathbf{M}=\left(\begin{array}{ll}1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right) .$$ Can this matrix be diagonalized?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The eigenvalue is 1 with a single eigenvector. The matrix can't be diagonalized.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Matrix

The matrix given is \( \mathbf{M} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \). It is a 2x2 upper triangular matrix.
02

Set up the Characteristic Equation

The eigenvalues of a matrix are determined by solving the characteristic equation \( \det(\mathbf{M} - \lambda \mathbf{I}) = 0 \). For our matrix, this becomes \( \det\left(\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} - \lambda \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \right) = 0 \).
03

Simplify the Determinant Expression

Simplify the expression inside the determinant: \( \begin{pmatrix} 1 - \lambda & 1 \ 0 & 1 - \lambda \end{pmatrix} \). The determinant of this matrix is \((1-\lambda)(1-\lambda) - 0\cdot1 = (1-\lambda)^2\).
04

Solve the Characteristic Equation

Set the determinant expression \((1-\lambda)^2 = 0\) to find \(\lambda\). Thus, \(\lambda = 1\) is the only eigenvalue, with multiplicity 2.
05

Find the Eigenvectors

For the eigenvalue \(\lambda = 1\), solve \((\mathbf{M} - \lambda \mathbf{I})\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0}\):\(\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} x \ y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \end{pmatrix} \).This leads to the equation \(y = 0\). So, the eigenvector is of the form \(\begin{pmatrix} x \ 0 \end{pmatrix}\), where \(x\) is any real number.
06

Determine Diagonalizability

A matrix is diagonalizable if it has enough linearly independent eigenvectors to form a basis for the space. Here, we only have one linearly independent eigenvector, not enough to diagonalize a 2x2 matrix.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Matrix Diagonalization
Matrix diagonalization is a method used in linear algebra to simplify matrix computations by transforming a matrix into a diagonal form. This process involves finding a diagonal matrix that is similar to the original matrix, along with a matrix of its eigenvectors. A matrix is diagonalizable if it can be expressed in the form \( extbf{M} = extbf{PDP}^{-1} \). Here, \( extbf{D} \) is a diagonal matrix, \( extbf{P} \) is a matrix of eigenvectors, and \( extbf{P}^{-1} \) is the inverse of \( extbf{P} \). This representation simplifies matrix powers and helps solve differential equations.

In the exercise, the given matrix \( \mathbf{M} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \) is not diagonalizable. It lacks the required number of linearly independent eigenvectors for this process. Specifically:
  • A 2x2 matrix needs 2 linearly independent eigenvectors to be diagonalized.
  • The matrix \( \mathbf{M} \) has only one linearly independent eigenvector.
The eigenvector found does not suffice for the space span needed to form \( extbf{P} \). Hence, we cannot convert \( \mathbf{M} \) into a diagonal form.
Characteristic Equation
The characteristic equation is central to finding a matrix's eigenvalues. It is derived from the expression \( \det(\textbf{M} - \lambda \textbf{I}) = 0 \), where \( \lambda \) represents eigenvalues and \( \textbf{I} \) is the identity matrix of the same size as \( \textbf{M} \). Solving this equation reveals the eigenvalues, which are critical in understanding the structure and behavior of a matrix.

For the matrix \( \mathbf{M} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \), the characteristic equation works out to be \((1 - \lambda)^2 = 0\). Let's break it down:
  • By calculating \( \det(\begin{pmatrix} 1 - \lambda & 1 \ 0 & 1 - \lambda \end{pmatrix}) \), the determinant simplifies to \((1-\lambda)^2\).
  • Solving the equation \((1-\lambda)^2 = 0\) gives \( \lambda = 1 \) with multiplicity 2.
The characteristic equation indicates that while the matrix has repeated eigenvalues, it does not provide enough unique eigenvectors necessary for diagonalization.
Eigenvector Multiplicity
Eigenvector multiplicity refers to the number of linearly independent eigenvectors associated with each eigenvalue of a matrix. It is an important concept to determine if a matrix is diagonalizable. An eigenvalue with a higher multiplicity requires a corresponding number of linearly independent eigenvectors. If the number of independent eigenvectors matches the multiplicity, the matrix can potentially be diagonalized.

In our example, the eigenvalue \( \lambda = 1 \) has a multiplicity of 2, meaning ideally, we need two linearly independent eigenvectors. However, the matrix \( \mathbf{M} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \) was found to have only one independent eigenvector:
  • The operation \((\mathbf{M} - \lambda \mathbf{I})\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0}\) led to \( y = 0 \), yielding the eigenvector \( \begin{pmatrix} x \ 0 \end{pmatrix} \).
Since this lone eigenvector is insufficient to span the required 2-dimensional space for diagonalization, the matrix is not diagonalizable. Understanding eigenvector multiplicity helps in quickly assessing a matrix's diagonalization potential.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Dirac proposed to peel apart the bracket notation for an inner product, \(\langle\alpha \mid \beta\rangle\), into two pieces, which he called bra \((\langle\alpha|)\) and ket \((|\beta\rangle)\). The latter is a vector, but what exactly is the former? It's a linear function of vectors, in the sense that when it hits a vector (to its right) it yields a (complex) number- product. \({ }^{31}\) (When an operator hits a vector, it delivers another vector; when a bra hits a vector, it delivers a number.) Actually, the collection of all bras constitutes another vector space - the so-called dual space. The license to treat bras as separate entities in their own right allows for some powerful and pretty notation (though I shall not exploit it further in this book), For example, if \(|\alpha\rangle\) is a normalized vector, the operator $$\hat{P} \equiv|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|$$ picks out the component of any other vector that "lies along" \(|\alpha\rangle\) : $$\hat{P}|\beta\rangle=(\alpha|\beta\rangle|\alpha\rangle ;$$ we call it the projection operator onto the one-dimensional subspace spanned by \(|\alpha\rangle .\) (a) Show that \(\hat{P}^{2}=\hat{P}\). Determine the eigenvalues of \(\hat{P}\), and characterize its eigenvectors. (b) Suppose \(\left|e_{j}\right\rangle\) is an orthonormal basis for an \(n\) -dimensional vector space. Show that $$\sum_{j=1}^{n}\left|e_{j}\right\rangle\left\langle e_{j}\right|=\mathbf{1}$$ This is the tidiest statement of completeness.the inner (c) Let \(\hat{Q}\) be an operator with a complete set of orthonormal eigenvectors: $$\hat{Q}\left|e_{j}\right\rangle=\lambda_{j}\left|e_{j}\right\rangle \quad(j=1,2,3, \ldots n)$$ Show that \(\hat{Q}\) can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition: $$\hat{Q}=\sum_{j=1}^{n} \lambda_{j}\left|e_{j}\right\rangle\left\langle e_{j}\right|$$ Hint: An operator is characterized by its action on all possible vectors, so what you must show is that $$\hat{Q}|\alpha\rangle=\left\\{\sum_{j=1}^{n} \lambda_{j}\left|e_{j}\right\rangle\left\langlee_{j}\right|\right\\}|\alpha\rangle$$ for any vector \(|\alpha\rangle\).

The \(2 \times 2\) matrix representing a rotation of the \(x y\) -plane is $$\mathbf{T}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}\cos \theta & -\sin \theta \\ \sin \theta & \cos \theta\end{array}\right)$$ Show that (except for certain special angles-what are they?) this matrix has no real eigenvalues. (This reflects the geometrical fact that no vector in the plane is carried into itself under such a rotation; contrast rotations in three dimensions.) This matrix does, however, have complex eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Find them. Construct a matrix \(S\) which diagonalizes \(T\). Perform the similarity transformation \(\left(\mathbf{S T S}^{-1}\right)\) explicitly, and show that it reduces \(\mathbf{T}\) to diagonal form.

Consider the ordinary vectors in three dimensions \(\left(a_{x} \hat{\imath}+a_{y} \hat{\jmath}+a_{z} \hat{k}\right)\) with complex components. (a) Does the subset of all vectors with \(a_{z}=0\) constitute a vector space? If so, what is its dimension; if not, why not? (b) What about the subset of all vectors whose \(z\) component is 1 ? (c) How about the subset of vectors whose components are all equal?

Prove that \(\operatorname{Tr}\left(\mathbf{T}_{1} \mathbf{T}_{2}\right)=\operatorname{Tr}\left(\mathbf{T}_{2} \mathbf{T}_{1}\right.\) ). It follows immediately that \(\operatorname{Tr}\left(\mathbf{T}_{1} \mathbf{T}_{2} \mathbf{T}_{3}\right)=\operatorname{Tr}\left(\mathbf{T}_{2} \mathbf{T}_{3} \mathbf{T}_{1}\right)\), but is it the case that \(\operatorname{Tr}\left(\mathbf{T}_{1} \mathbf{T}_{2} \mathbf{T}_{3}\right)=\operatorname{Tr}\left(\mathbf{T}_{2} \mathbf{T}_{1} \mathbf{T}_{3}\right)\), in gen- cral? Prove it, or disprove it. Hint: The best disproof is always a counterexampleand the simpler the better!

Prove the famous "(your name) uncertainty principle," relating the uncertainty in position \((A=x)\) to the uncertainty in energy \(\left(B=p^{2} / 2 m+V\right)\) : $$\sigma_{x} \sigma_{H} \geq \frac{\hbar}{2 m}|\langle p\rangle| .$$ For stationary states this doesn't tell you much-why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.