/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Show that the "original" beta-de... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Show that the "original" beta-decay reaction \(n \rightarrow p+e\) would violate conservation of angular momentum (all three particles have spin \(\left.\frac{4}{2}\right)\). If you were Pauli, proposing that the reaction is really \(n \rightarrow p+e+\bar{\nu}_{e}\), what spin would you assign to the neutrino?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The neutrino's spin is \( \frac{1}{2} \).

Step by step solution

01

Identify given spins and conservation laws

In the original beta-decay reaction, a neutron () decays into a proton (), an electron (), and we hypothesize a neutrino (). All particles involved initially (neutron, proton, and electron) have a spin of \( \frac{1}{2} \). The problem statement requires us to verify conservation of angular momentum.
02

Analyze the original reaction

In the original reaction \( n \rightarrow p + e \), the neutron starts with spin \( \frac{1}{2} \), but according to angular momentum conservation, the total angular momentum before and after must be equal. However, with both proton and electron each having spins of \( \frac{1}{2} \), the total spin after the decay can only be 0 or 1, never attaining the initial \( \frac{1}{2} \) spin of the neutron.
03

Hypothesize the inclusion of a neutrino

Pauli suggested another particle, the neutrino (\( \bar{u}_{e} \)), with an unknown spin, to be involved in the reaction. This addition aims to conserve all necessary quantities, including angular momentum.
04

Assign spin to the neutrino

For conservation of angular momentum, the sum of spins should equal \( \frac{1}{2} \). Assuming the spins of proton and electron can add to either 0 or 1, the neutrino's spin should allow for the total to equate to the initial \( \frac{1}{2} \). Assigning the neutrino a spin of \( \frac{1}{2} \) allows it to couple with the other particles’ spins to satisfy conservation requirements.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Spin Conservation
In physics, spin is a fundamental property of particles, similar to charge or mass. Spin conservation is crucial in understanding subatomic reactions, like beta decay. When a particle undergoes decay, the total spin of the system before and after the reaction must remain constant.
In the original beta-decay reaction, a neutron, which has a spin of \( \frac{1}{2} \), is expected to conserve its spin during the decay process. However, if the neutron decays into just a proton and an electron, both of which also have spin \( \frac{1}{2} \), their combined spins can only result in values of 0 or 1. Neither of these satisfy the initial condition of spin \( \frac{1}{2} \), breaking the spin conservation law. This discrepancy highlights the necessity of reevaluating the reaction to account for all components accurately.
Pauli's Neutrino Hypothesis
To resolve the contradiction in spin conservation in beta decay, the physicist Wolfgang Pauli proposed the existence of an additional particle — the neutrino. This hypothesis was ground-breaking at the time because it suggested that the known particles in the reaction didn’t account for all energy and momentum variances.
Pauli envisioned the neutrino as a neutral particle with undetectable mass and characteristics at the time. By introducing the neutrino, specifically an anti-neutrino \( \bar{u}_e \), Pauli aimed to satisfy the necessary conservation laws, not limited to angular momentum but also energy and linear momentum.
His hypothesis was revolutionary, setting the foundation for modern particle physics by expanding our understanding of the subtle intricacies involved in atomic reactions.
Neutron Decay
Neutron decay, or beta decay, involves a neutron transforming into a proton, an electron, and an anti-neutrino. This process is essential for maintaining stability in nuclei with an excess of neutrons.
In neutron decay, the neutron () decays into a proton (p), an electron (e), and a neutrino (sometimes represented as \( \bar{u}_e \)), in order to comply with the conservation of charge and other physical laws.
The neutron's decay spectrum became more comprehensible with Pauli’s neutrino hypothesis as it allowed the emitted electron and the unobserved neutrino to share energy in such a way that momentum and angular momentum are conserved. Understanding this decay is vital for comprehending radioactive processes and contributes significantly to cosmological models.
Angular Momentum in Physics
Angular momentum is a vector quantity that reflects the rotational motion of an object. It plays a critical role in various physical systems, from celestial bodies to subatomic particles.
In the context of particle physics, such as during beta decay, angular momentum conservation is fundamental. The total initial angular momentum must match the total final angular momentum after the decay event.
This conservation principle was what Pauli used to support his neutrino hypothesis. By introducing an additional particle, the system's total angular momentum added up correctly, reinforcing angular momentum's role as a guiding principle in predicting and explaining particle interactions and reactions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Show that the set of all unitary \(n \times n\) matrices constitutes a group. (To prove closure, for instance, you must show that the product of two unitary matrices is itself unitary.) (b) Show that the set of all \(n \times n\) unitary matrices with determinant 1 constitutes a group. (c) Show that \(O(n)\) is a group. (d) Show that \(S O(n)\) is a group.

(a) Check that the Gell-Mann-Nishijima formula works for the quarks \(u, d\). and \(s\). (b) What are the appropriate isospin assignments, \(\left|I I_{3}\right\rangle\), for the antiquarks, \(\bar{u}, d\). and \(\bar{s} ?\) Check that your assignment is consistent with the Gell-Mann-Nishijima formula. [Since Q. \(I_{3}, A\), and \(S\) all add, when we combine quarks together, it follows that the Gell-Mann-Nishijima formula holds for all hadrons made out of \(u, d\). \(s, \bar{u}, d\), and \(\bar{s} .]\)

In the decay \(\Delta^{++} \rightarrow p+\pi^{+}\), what are the possible values of the orbital angular momentum quantum number, \(l\), in the final state?

Find the ratio of the cross sections for the following reactions, when the total \(C M\) energy is \(1232 \mathrm{MeV}:\) (a) \(\pi^{-}+p \rightarrow K^{0}+\Sigma^{0}\); (b) \(\pi^{-}+p \rightarrow K^{+}+\Sigma^{-} ;\)(c) \(\pi^{-}\) \(+p \rightarrow K^{+}+\Sigma^{+}\)

For two isospin- \(\frac{1}{2}\) particles, show that \(I^{(1)} \cdot I^{(2)}=\frac{1}{4}\) in the triplet state and \(-3\) in the singlet. [Hint: \(\mathbf{I}_{\mathrm{tot}}=\mathbf{I}^{(1)}+\mathbf{I}^{(2)} ;\) square both sides.]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.