Chapter 1: Q24P (page 22)
Derive the three quotient rules.
Short Answer
The three quotient rules
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 1: Q24P (page 22)
Derive the three quotient rules.
The three quotient rules
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Although the gradient, divergence, and curl theorems are the fundamental integral theorems of vector calculus, it is possible to derive a number of corollaries from them. Show that:
(a). [Hint:Let v = cT, where c is a constant, in the divergence theorem; use the product rules.]
(b). [Hint:Replace v by (v x c) in the divergence
theorem.]
(c) . [Hint:Let in the
divergence theorem.]
(d). [Comment:This is sometimes
called Green's second identity; it follows from (c), which is known as
Green's identity.]
(e) [Hint:Let v = cT in Stokes' theorem.]
In case you're not persuaded that (Eq. 1.102) with for simplicity), try replacing rbyrole="math" localid="1654684442094" , and watching what happens as Specifically, let role="math" localid="1654686235475"
To demonstrate that this goes to as :
(a) Show that
(b) Check that , as
(c)Check that , as , for all
(d) Check that the integral of over all space is 1.
Express the unit vectors in terms of x, y, z (that is, derive Eq. 1.64). Check your answers several ways ( ?1, ??), .Also work out the inverse formulas, giving x, y, z in terms of (and ).
For Theorem 2, show that , , , and
A uniform current density fills a slab straddling the plane, from to . A magnetic dipole is situated at the origin.
(a) Find the force on the dipole, using Eq. 6.3.
(b) Do the same for a dipole pointing in the direction: .
(c) In the electrostatic case, the expressions and are equivalent (prove it), but this is not the case for the magnetic analogs (explain why). As an example, calculate for the configurations in (a) and (b).
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.