/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3.17P DeriveP3(x) from the Rodrigues ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

DeriveP3(x)from the Rodrigues formula, and check that P3(cosθ)satisfies the angular equation (3.60) for I=3. Check that P3and P1are orthogonal by explicit integration.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

Hence it is checked using explicit integration that P1xand P3xare orthogonal.

Step by step solution

01

Define functions

Write the formula of Rodrigues’s.

PI(x)=12II!(ddx)I(x2-1)I …… (1)

02

Determine functions

Calculate the P3xusing equation (1).

Therefore,

P3x=1233!ddx3x2-13=148d3dx3x2-13=18d2dx2xx2-12

Solve as further,

P3x=18ddxx2-12+2xx2-12x=18ddxx2-12+4x2x2-1=18ddxx2-12+4x4-4x2=182x2-12x+44x3-8x

Solve as further,

P3x=1820x3-4x-8x=52x3-32x

Therefore,

P3cosθ=52cos3θ-32cosθ

03

Determine that P3(cosθ) satisfies the equation.


1sinθ∂∂θsinθdPdθ=-II+1P

Here, I=3

dP3dθ=ddθ52cos3θ-32cosθ=523cos2θ-sinθ-32-sinθ=-32sinθ5cos2θ-1

Multiply by sinθon both the sides,

sinθdP3dθ=-31sin2θ5cos2θ-1∂∂θsinθdP3dθ=-32∂∂θsin2θ5cos2θ-1=-325cos2θ-12sinθcosθ+sin2θ10cosθ-sinθ=-325cos2θ-cosθ2sinθ-sin3θ10cosθ1sinθ∂∂θsinθ∂P3∂θ=-3225cos3θ-cosθ-10sin2θcosθ=-3×452cos3θ-32cosθ=-II+1P3

1sinθ∂∂θsinθ∂P3∂θ=-3225cos3θ-cosθ-10sin2θcosθ=-3×452cos3θ-32cosθ=-II+1P3

Hence, it is proved.

04

Determine P3 and P1 are orthogonal

Now,

P1x=xP3x=52x3-32x

Using explicit integration the orthogonal condition can be derived as,

∫-1+1P1xP3xdx=0∫-1+1x125x3-3xdx12∫-1+15x4-3x2dx125x55-1+1-3x33-1+1121+1-1=0

Therefore, P1xand P3xare orthogonal.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In one sentence, justify Earnshaw's Theorem: A charged particle cannot be held in a stable equilibrium by electrostatic forces alone. As an example, consider the cubical arrangement of fixed charges in Fig. 3.4. It looks, off hand, as though a positive charge at the center would be suspended in midair, since it is repelled away from each comer. Where is the leak in this "electrostatic bottle"? [To harness nuclear fusion as a practical energy source it is necessary to heat a plasma (soup of charged particles) to fantastic temperatures-so hot that contact would vaporize any ordinary pot. Earnshaw's theorem says that electrostatic containment is also out of the question. Fortunately, it is possible to confine a hot plasma magnetically.]

Prove that the field is uniquely determined when the charge density ÒÏ

is given and either V or the normal derivative a ∂V/∂n is specified on each boundary surface. Do not assume the boundaries are conductors, or that V is constant over any given surface.

Show that the average field inside a sphere of radius R, due to all the charge within the sphere, is

Eave=-14πε0ÒÏR3

Where ÒÏis the total dipole moment. There are several ways to prove this delightfully simple result. Here's one method:

(a) Show that the average field due to a single chargeqat point r inside thesphere is the same as the field at r due to a uniformly charged sphere with

ÒÏ=q/(43Ï€R3), namely

14πε0(43πR3)∫qr2rdζ'

Where r is the vector from r to dζ

(b) The latter can be found from Gauss's law (see Prob. 2.12). Express the answerin terms of the dipole moment of q.

(c) Use the superposition principle to generalize to an arbitrary charge distribution.

(d) While you're at it, show that the average field over the volume of a sphere, dueto all the charges outside, is the same as the field they produce at the center.

Buckminsterfullerine is a molecule of 60 carbon atoms arranged

like the stitching on a soccer-ball. It may be approximated as a conducting spherical shell of radius R=3.5A°. A nearby electron would be attracted, according to Prob. 3.9, so it is not surprising that the ion C60-exists. (Imagine that the electron on average-smears itself out uniformly over the surface.) But how about a second electron? At large distances it would be repelled by the ion, obviously, but at a certain distance r (from the center), the net force is zero, and closer than this it would be attracted. So an electron with enough energy to get in that close should bind.

(a) Find r, in A°. [You'll have to do it numerically.]

(b) How much energy (in electron volts) would it take to push an electron in (from

infinity) to the point r? [Incidentally, the C60-ion has been observed.]

(a) Show that the quadrupole term in the multipole expansion can be written as

V"quad"(r⃗)=14πε01r3∑(i,j=13r^ir^jQij     .....(1)

(in the notation of Eq. 1.31) where

localid="1658485520347" Qij=12∫[3ri'rj'-(r')2δij]ÒÏ(r⃗')dÏ„'     .....(2)

Here

δ_ij={1ifi=j0ifi≠j       .....(3)

is the Kronecker Deltalocalid="1658485013827" (Qij)and is the quadrupole moment of the charge distribution. Notice the hierarchy

localid="1658485969560" Vmon=14πε0Qr;Vdip=14πε0∑r^ipjr2;Vquad(r⇶Ä)=14πε01r3∑i,j=13r^ir^jQIJ;...

The monopole moment localid="1658485018381" (Q) is a scalar, the dipole moment localid="1658485022577" (p⇶Ä) is a vector, the quadrupole moment localid="1658485026647" (Qij)is a second rank tensor, and so on.

(b) Find all nine components of localid="1658485030553" (Qij)for the configuration given in Fig. 3.30 (assume the square has side and lies in the localid="1658485034755" x-y plane, centered at the origin).

(c) Show that the quadrupole moment is independent of origin if the monopole and

dipole moments both vanish. (This works all the way up the hierarchy-the

lowest nonzero multipole moment is always independent of origin.)

(d) How would you define the octopole moment? Express the octopole term in the multipole expansion in terms of the octopole moment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.