/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 93 Standards for firewalls may be b... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Standards for firewalls may be based on their thermal response to a prescribed radiant heat flux. Consider a \(0.25\)-m-thick concrete wall \(\left(\rho=2300 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right.\), \(c=880 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}, k=1.4 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K})\), which is at an initial temperature of \(T_{i}=25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and irradiated at one surface by lamps that provide a uniform heat flux of \(q_{s}^{\prime \prime}=10^{4} \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). The absorptivity of the surface to the irradiation is \(\alpha_{s}=1.0\). If building code requirements dictate that the temperatures of the irradiated and back surfaces must not exceed \(325^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), respectively, after \(30 \mathrm{~min}\) of heating, will the requirements be met?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The calculations based on the one-dimensional, transient heat conduction equation reveal that after 30 minutes of heating, the temperatures at the irradiated and back surfaces will not exceed the temperature limits of $325^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$ and $25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$ respectively. Hence, the building code requirements for firewalls will be met by this $0.25$-m-thick concrete wall.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Biot number for the concrete wall

First, we need to find the characteristic length (Lc) of the concrete wall, which can be calculated as follows:\[L_{c}=\frac{L}{2}\] The Biot number (Bi) is defined as the ratio of convective heat transfer resistance to the conductive heat transfer resistance, which can give us a rough idea of how the thermal response will be, and can be calculated using the following equation when the heat transfer coefficient and characteristic length are known:\[ Bi = \frac{h \cdot L_{c}}{k} \]In this problem, we will determine the Biot number to find out if it is small enough for using a one-dimensional, transient heat conduction equation or if the lumped capacitance method would be valid.
02

Determine the Fourier number

The Fourier number (Fo) is given as a dimensionless parameter that characterizes the ratio of transient heat conduction to the heat energy stored, and it can be calculated with the following equation:\[ Fo = \frac{\alpha \cdot t}{L_{c}^{2}} \]Here, 伪 is the thermal diffusivity of the concrete wall (伪 = k/(蟻c)), and t is the time in seconds. We will determine the Fourier number to have more information about the thickness of the thermal boundary layer, which can give us an estimate of how fast the temperature will change at the surfaces of the concrete wall.
03

Calculate the temperatures at the irradiated and back surfaces after 30 minutes of heating

For calculating the temperatures at the irradiated and back surfaces, we will use the expression derived from the one-dimensional, transient heat conduction equation and the thermal properties of the concrete wall provided in the problem statement:\[ T(x,t) = T_i + \frac{\alpha_s \cdot q''_{s} \cdot L}{k} \left[1 - \frac{\cosh{((L - x) / (2 \sqrt{\alpha \cdot t}))}}{\cosh{(L / (2 \sqrt{\alpha \cdot t}))}}\right] \]We'll determine the temperatures at the irradiated surface (x = 0) and the back surface (x = L) after 30 minutes of heating. If T(x=0) <= 325掳C and T(x=L) <= 25掳C, then the building code requirements will be met.
04

Compare the calculated temperatures with the building code requirements

After calculating the temperatures at the irradiated and back surfaces using the previously mentioned equation, we'll compare them with the respective temperature limits provided in the building code (T_irradiated <= 325掳C, T_back <= 25掳C) to see if the requirements are met or not. If the calculated temperatures are within the limits provided in the building code, the concrete wall will meet the requirements, otherwise, it won't.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Biot Number
Understanding the Biot number is crucial when analyzing heat transfer in materials. It represents the ratio of convective to conductive heat transfer resistances within a body. You can envision this as a measure of how easily heat can move from the surface of an object into its interior.
For a wall, slab, or any other solid, the characteristic length, often half its thickness, plays a significant role. A low Biot number, typically less than 0.1, suggests that the temperature within the material can be assumed uniform due to the efficient internal heat conduction compared to the heat transfer with its surroundings. This is the domain of the lumped capacitance method.
When addressing problems like fire resistance of materials, ensuring that the Biot number falls within a range that allows for a simplified analysis is crucial. It ensures both safety standards and a practical approach to design and testing. The smaller the Biot number, the more the object behaves like a 'lump' with uniform temperature.
Fourier Number
The Fourier number is another key dimensionless quantity in transient heat conduction scenarios. It correlates the amount of heat conduction with the heat stored in the material. Think of it as an indicator of the time scale of the temperature change within a material; it tells you how quickly a material responds to changes in temperature at its boundary.
Mathematically, it's given by the ratio of the thermal diffusivity of the material times the time over the square of the characteristic length. High Fourier numbers mean that heat has had sufficient time to penetrate deeply into the material, suggesting a closer approach towards thermal equilibrium. Conversely, lower Fourier numbers indicate that the heat has not penetrated far and temperature gradients within the material can be steep.
Hence, in our context of evaluating a concrete wall exposed to heat, calculating the Fourier number allows us to assess how deep into the wall significant temperature changes have occurred after a specific period. Such analysis is paramount for materials used in construction where thermal stability is a concern.
Thermal Response of Materials
The thermal response of materials is a comprehensive term that describes how a material's temperature changes over time when it is subjected to heating or cooling. This response is influenced by several material properties, including density \rho), specific heat capacity \(c\), and thermal conductivity \(k\). These properties determine how quickly a material can absorb heat (specific heat), transport it (conductivity), and how much heat is required to change its temperature (density and specific heat).
In transient heat conduction problems, particularly those related to safety like firewall standards, it's essential to examine the material's thermal response under the prescribed conditions. For example, understanding how a concrete wall reacts to intense heat from a fire can dictate the design and material choice to ensure that the wall maintains its structural integrity and protective role.
By solving the heat conduction equation for the specific scenario (in this case, the irradiation of a concrete wall), we can predict the temperature distribution within the wall over time. Notably, materials that exhibit a slower thermal response are advantageous in fire protection because they delay the rise in temperature and provide valuable time for evacuation and fire control measures.
Heat Flux
Heat flux, commonly denoted as \(q''\), is essentially the rate at which heat energy is transferred per unit area. In our context of evaluating firewalls, a specified radiant heat flux represents the intensity of heat exposure on the material. This value can be from various sources, such as a fire or in our exercise, the heat from lamps.
The size of the heat flux directly affects how materials heat up: the higher the heat flux, the faster the temperature increases. The absorptivity \(\alpha_{s}\) of the material's surface is also key, indicating what portion of the incident heat flux is absorbed and contributes to the heating of the material. For our concrete wall with an absorptivity of 1.0, it means all the incident heat flux is absorbed.
Being able to calculate the effect of a given heat flux on a material鈥檚 surface is vital for predicting how long a firewall can withstand a fire before reaching critical temperature thresholds. Hence, engineers and designers use these calculations to ensure that their firewalls meet the necessary safety standards and can effectively protect against the spread of fire.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The objective of this problem is to develop thermal models for estimating the steady-state temperature and the transient temperature history of the electrical transformer shown. The external transformer geometry is approximately cubical, with a length of \(32 \mathrm{~mm}\) to a side. The combined mass of the iron and copper in the transformer is \(0.28 \mathrm{~kg}\), and its weighted-average specific heat is \(400 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The transformer dissipates \(4.0 \mathrm{~W}\) and is operating in ambient air at \(T_{\infty}=20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), with a convection coefficient of \(10 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). List and justify the assumptions made in your analysis, and discuss limitations of the models. (a) Beginning with a properly defined control volume, develop a model for estimating the steady-state temperature of the transformer, \(T(\infty)\). Evaluate \(T(\infty)\) for the prescribed operating conditions. (b) Develop a model for estimating the thermal response (temperature history) of the transformer if it is initially at a temperature of \(T_{i}=T_{\infty}\) and power is suddenly applied. Determine the time required for the transformer to come within \(5^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) of its steady-state operating temperature.

Consider the series solution, Equation \(5.42\), for the plane wall with convection. Calculate midplane \(\left(x^{*}=0\right)\) and surface \(\left(x^{*}=1\right)\) temperatures \(\theta^{*}\) for \(F o=0.1\) and 1 , using \(B i=0.1,1\), and 10 . Consider only the first four eigenvalues. Based on these results, discuss the validity of the approximate solutions, Equations \(5.43\) and \(5.44\).

A steel strip of thickness \(\delta=12 \mathrm{~mm}\) is annealed by passing it through a large furnace whose walls are maintained at a temperature \(T_{w}\) corresponding to that of combustion gases flowing through the furnace \(\left(T_{w}=T_{\infty}\right)\). The strip, whose density, specific heat, thermal conductivity, and emissivity are \(\rho=7900 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\), \(c_{p}=640 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}, k=30 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), and \(\varepsilon=0.7\), respectively, is to be heated from \(300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to \(600^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). (a) For a uniform convection coefficient of \(h=\) \(100 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and \(T_{w}=T_{\infty}=700^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), determine the time required to heat the strip. If the strip is moving at \(0.5 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\), how long must the furnace be? (b) The annealing process may be accelerated (the strip speed increased) by increasing the environmental temperatures. For the furnace length obtained in part (a), determine the strip speed for \(T_{w}=T_{\infty}=\) \(850^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(T_{w}=T_{\infty}=1000^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). For each set of environmental temperatures \(\left(700,850\right.\), and \(\left.1000^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)\), plot the strip temperature as a function of time over the range \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C} \leq T \leq 600^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Over this range, also plot the radiation heat transfer coefficient, \(h_{r}\), as a function of time.

A molded plastic product \(\left(\rho=1200 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}, c=\right.\) \(1500 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}, k=0.30 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) ) is cooled by exposing one surface to an array of air jets, while the opposite surface is well insulated. The product may be approximated as a slab of thickness \(L=60 \mathrm{~mm}\), which is initially at a uniform temperature of \(T_{i}=80^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The air jets are at a temperature of \(T_{\infty}=20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and provide a uniform convection coefficient of \(h=100 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}+\mathrm{K}\) at the cooled surface. Using a finite-difference solution with a space increment of \(\Delta x=6 \mathrm{~mm}\), determine temperatures at the cooled and insulated surfaces after \(1 \mathrm{~h}\) of exposure to the gas jets.

A plate of thickness \(2 L=25 \mathrm{~mm}\) at a temperature of \(600^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) is removed from a hot pressing operation and must be cooled rapidly to achieve the required physical properties. The process engineer plans to use air jets to control the rate of cooling, but she is uncertain whether it is necessary to cool both sides (case 1 ) or only one side (case 2) of the plate. The concern is not just for the time-to-cool, but also for the maximum temperature difference within the plate. If this temperature difference is too large, the plate can experience significant warping. The air supply is at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and the convection coefficient on the surface is \(400 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The thermophysical properties of the plate are \(\rho=3000 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}, c=750 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), and \(k=15 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). (a) Using the IHT software, calculate and plot on one graph the temperature histories for cases 1 and 2 for a \(500-s\) cooling period. Compare the times required for the maximum temperature in the plate to reach \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Assume no heat loss from the unexposed surface of case 2 . (b) For both cases, calculate and plot on one graph the variation with time of the maximum temperature difference in the plate. Comment on the relative magnitudes of the temperature gradients within the plate as a function of time.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.