/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 59 A \(0.20\)-m-diameter, thin-wall... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A \(0.20\)-m-diameter, thin-walled steel pipe is used to transport saturated steam at a pressure of 20 bars in a room for which the air temperature is \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and the convection heat transfer coefficient at the outer surface of the pipe is \(20 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). (a) What is the heat loss per unit length from the bare pipe (no insulation)? Estimate the heat loss per unit length if a 50 -mm-thick layer of insulation (magnesia, \(85 \%\) is added. The steel and magnesia may each be assumed to have an emissivity of \(0.8\), and the steam-side convection resistance may be neglected. (b) The costs associated with generating the steam and installing the insulation are known to be \(\$ 4 / 10^{9} \mathrm{~J}\) and \(\$ 100 / \mathrm{m}\) of pipe length, respectively. If the steam line is to operate \(7500 \mathrm{~h} / \mathrm{yr}\), how many years are needed to pay back the initial investment in insulation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The heat loss per unit length without insulation is approximately \(23568 \mathrm{~W/m}\), and with insulation, it is approximately \(7253 \mathrm{~W/m}\). The payback period for the insulation investment is approximately 5.37 years.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the heat loss per unit length without insulation

Using the formula for heat loss per unit length by convection, we have: \[q'=h \cdot \pi \cdot D \cdot \Delta T\] Where, \(q'\) is the heat loss per unit length, and \(\Delta T = T_{s} - T_{r}\). But first, we need to find the temperature of the steam, \(T_{s}\), at the given pressure (20 bars). For this, we can use the steam table to look up the saturation temperature: 1 bar = 100000 Pa, therefore 20 bars = 2000000 Pa. Looking up in the steam table, we find that the saturation temperature at 2000000 Pa is around \(212 ^\circ \mathrm{C}\). Now we can proceed with the calculation. \[\Delta T = 212 - 25 = 187 \mathrm{~K}\] \[q' = 20 \cdot \pi \cdot 0.20 \cdot 187 = 23568 \mathrm{~W/m}\] The heat loss per unit length without insulation is approximately \(23568 \mathrm{~W/m}\).
02

Determine the heat loss per unit length with insulation

To calculate the heat loss per unit length with insulation, we need to find the overall heat transfer coefficient (including convection, conduction, and radiation). We can use the following equation: \[\frac{1}{U_{total}} = \frac{1}{h} + \frac{1}{h_{r}} + \frac{t}{k}\] Where, \(U_{total}\) is the overall heat transfer coefficient, \(h_{r}\) is the radiation heat transfer coefficient, and \(k\) is the thermal conductivity of the insulation material. According to the given information, we can assume that the steam-side convection resistance is negligible. The emissivity of the steel and magnesia is \(0.8\). We can use the following equation to calculate the radiation heat transfer coefficient: \[h_{r} = \epsilon \cdot \sigma \cdot \frac{(T_{s}+273)^{4} - (T_{r}+273)^{4}}{(T_{s}-T_{r})}\] Where, \(\sigma = 5.67 \times 10^{-8}\) is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Plugging in the values, we get \(h_{r}\approx 19.928 \mathrm{~W/m^{2} \cdot K}\). Now, we need to find the thermal conductivity of the insulation material (magnesia). The given information states that it is \(85\%\) magnesia. Looking up the thermal conductivity of \(85 \% \) magnesia, we find \(k \approx 0.045 \mathrm{~W/m \cdot K}\). Now we can find the overall heat transfer coefficient: \[\frac{1}{U_{total}} = \frac{1}{20} + \frac{1}{19.928} + \frac{0.05}{0.045}\] \[U_{total} \approx 6.07989 \mathrm{~W/m^{2} \cdot K}\] Lastly, we can find the heat loss per unit length with insulation: \[q'_{insulation} = U_{total} \cdot \pi \cdot D \cdot \Delta T \approx 6.07989 \cdot \pi \cdot 0.20 \cdot 187 = 7253 \mathrm{~W/m}\] The heat loss per unit length with insulation is approximately \(7253 \mathrm{~W/m}\).
03

Estimate the payback period for the insulation

Let's calculate the energy cost without insulation per year and the energy cost with insulation per year: Energy cost without insulation per year (\(C_{no\_insulation}\)): \[\frac{23568 \mathrm{~W/m}}{10^{9} \mathrm{~J}} \times 7500 \mathrm{~h/yr} \times 3600 \mathrm{~s/h} \times \$4 = \$2523.9744/m\] Energy cost with insulation per year (\(C_{insulation}\)): \[\frac{7253 \mathrm{~W/m}}{10^{9} \mathrm{~J}} \times 7500 \mathrm{~h/yr} \times 3600 \mathrm{~s/h} \times \$4 = \$774.6888/m\] Now, let's find the initial insulation investment cost: \[\$100/m\] Now, we can find the payback years: \[\textrm{Payback years} = \frac{\textrm{Initial investment cost}}{\textrm{Energy cost saved per year}} = \frac{100}{2523.9744 - 774.6888}\] \[\textrm{Payback years} \approx 5.37\] The payback period for the insulation investment is approximately 5.37 years.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Convection Heat Transfer
Convection heat transfer refers to the process by which heat is transferred through the motion of fluids, such as liquids or gases. In the context of our problem, we are concerned with air surrounding a hot steel pipe. The heat from the pipe is transferred to the air, causing it to warm and rise.Convection heat transfer is calculated using the convection heat transfer coefficient (denoted as \(h\)). This coefficient represents how effectively heat is transferred from the pipe to the surrounding air. In the given scenario, the convection heat transfer coefficient is \(20 \, \mathrm{W/m^2 \cdot K}\). The higher the coefficient, the more efficient the heat transfer by convection.
  • The formula to calculate heat loss per unit length from a surface by convection is: \[q' = h \cdot \pi \cdot D \cdot \Delta T\]where \(q'\) is the heat loss per unit length, \(D\) is the diameter of the pipe, and \(\Delta T\) is the temperature difference between the pipe surface and the air.
  • In our exercise, the pipe's convection heat loss, where the air temperature is \(25^\circ \mathrm{C}\), helps us understand how effective the pipe is in transferring heat to its surroundings.
Understanding convection is essential as it helps evaluate energy efficiency and design considerations for systems involving fluids.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal conductivity is a property of materials that indicates their ability to conduct heat. It is a crucial factor when considering insulation materials. A lower thermal conductivity means that a material is better at preventing heat transfer, thus providing better insulation.In this exercise, we looked at a magnesia layer being added to insulate the steel pipe. The thermal conductivity of the magnesia, considering its composition is 85%, is approximately \(0.045 \, \mathrm{W/m \cdot K}\).
  • Thermal conductivity \(k\) is used in the formula for the overall heat transfer coefficient:\[ \frac{1}{U_{total}} = \frac{1}{h} + \frac{1}{h_{r}} + \frac{t}{k} \]where \(t\) is the thickness of the insulation.
  • The lower the thermal conductivity, the higher the overall insulation efficiency, reducing heat loss and making the system more energy-efficient.
Evaluating thermal conductivity helps in choosing the right material for energy conservation and system design, thereby saving costs on heating or cooling over time.
Insulation Efficiency
Insulation efficiency revolves around how well an insulation material can reduce heat loss. It directly correlates with the ability of the material to maintain desired temperatures inside pipes or buildings, reducing the need for external heating or cooling resources.In this problem, the addition of a 50-mm-thick magnesia layer demonstrates its capability to provide a significant reduction in heat loss, from \(23568 \, \mathrm{W/m}\) without insulation to \(7253 \, \mathrm{W/m}\) with insulation.
  • Insulation efficiency can be gauged by the reduction in heat transfer coefficient \(U_{total}\):\[ U_{total} = \frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{h} + \frac{1}{h_{r}} + \frac{t}{k}\right)} \]
  • Efficient insulation plays a critical role in industrial applications where energy costs and sustainability are concerns.
Well-insulated systems contribute to energy conservation and cost savings, thereby increasing the system's overall efficiency and reducing the environmental impact.
Radiation Heat Transfer
Radiation heat transfer is the transfer of heat energy through electromagnetic waves without needing a medium like air or water. This form of heat transfer can occur in a vacuum.In the exercise, the emissivity of the steel pipe and insulation (both at 0.8) is crucial for determining the pipe's radiation heat transfer coefficient, denoted as \(h_r\).
  • The radiation heat transfer coefficient \(h_r\) is given by the formula:\[ h_r = \varepsilon \cdot \sigma \cdot \frac{(T_s+273)^4 - (T_r+273)^4}{(T_s-T_r)} \]where \(\varepsilon\) is emissivity, and \(\sigma = 5.67 \times 10^{-8} \, \mathrm{W/m^2 \cdot K^4}\) is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant.
  • The calculated \(h_r\) lets us understand the amount of heat transfer resisted by radiation.
Understanding radiation heat transfer is vital for evaluating the system's cooling or heating requirements. It affects how much energy is lost or conserved, influencing the overall efficiency and cost management of thermal systems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Measurements show that steady-state conduction through a plane wall without heat generation produced a convex temperature distribution such that the midpoint temperature was \(\Delta T_{o}\) higher than expected for a linear temperature distribution. Assuming that the thermal conductivity has a linear dependence on temperature, \(k=k_{o}(1+\alpha T)\), where \(\alpha\) is a constant, develop a relationship to evaluate \(\alpha\) in terms of \(\Delta T_{o}, T_{1}\), and \(T_{2}\).

A thin flat plate of length \(L\), thickness \(t\), and width \(W \geqslant L\) is thermally joined to two large heat sinks that are maintained at a temperature \(T_{o}\). The bottom of the plate is well insulated, while the net heat flux to the top surface of the plate is known to have a uniform value of \(q_{o}^{\prime \prime}\) (a) Derive the differential equation that determines the steady-state temperature distribution \(T(x)\) in the plate. (b) Solve the foregoing equation for the temperature distribution, and obtain an expression for the rate of heat transfer from the plate to the heat sinks.

A probe of overall length \(L=200 \mathrm{~mm}\) and diameter \(D=\) \(12.5 \mathrm{~mm}\) is inserted through a duct wall such that a portion of its length, referred to as the immersion length \(L_{i}\), is in contact with the water stream whose temperature, \(T_{\infty, i}\) is to be determined. The convection coefficients over the immersion and ambient-exposed lengths are \(h_{i}=1100 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and \(h_{o}=10 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), respectively. The probe has a thermal conductivity of \(177 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and is in poor thermal contact with the duct wall. (a) Derive an expression for evaluating the measurement error, \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{err}}=T_{\text {tip }}-T_{\infty, i}\), which is the difference between the tip temperature, \(T_{\text {lip }}\), and the water temperature, \(T_{\infty, i \cdot}\) Hint: Define a coordinate system with the origin at the duct wall and treat the probe as two fins extending inward and outward from the duct, but having the same base temperature. Use Case A results from Table 3.4. (b) With the water and ambient air temperatures at 80 and \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), respectively, calculate the measurement error, \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{er}}\), as a function of immersion length for the conditions \(L_{i} / L=0.225,0.425\), and \(0.625\). (c) Compute and plot the effects of probe thermal conductivity and water velocity \(\left(h_{i}\right)\) on the measurement error.

A cylindrical shell of inner and outer radii, \(r_{i}\) and \(r_{o}\), respectively, is filled with a heat-generating material that provides a uniform volumetric generation rate \(\left(\mathrm{W} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right)\) of \(\dot{q}\). The inner surface is insulated, while the outer surface of the shell is exposed to a fluid at \(T_{\infty}\) and a convection coefficient \(h\). (a) Obtain an expression for the steady-state temperature distribution \(T(r)\) in the shell, expressing your result in terms of \(r_{i}, r_{o}, \dot{q}, h, T_{\infty}\), and the thermal conductivity \(k\) of the shell material. (b) Determine an expression for the heat rate, \(q^{\prime}\left(r_{o}\right)\), at the outer radius of the shell in terms of \(\dot{q}\) and shell dimensions.

A plane wall of thickness \(0.1 \mathrm{~m}\) and thermal conductivity \(25 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) having uniform volumetric heat generation of \(0.3 \mathrm{MW} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\) is insulated on one side, while the other side is exposed to a fluid at \(92^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The convection heat transfer coefficient between the wall and the fluid is \(500 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). Determine the maximum temperature in the wall.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.