/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Show that the three-dimensional ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Show that the three-dimensional cubic curve that is parameterised as $$ x=a+b \lambda, \quad y=a \lambda+b \lambda^{2}, \quad z=-\lambda^{3} $$ where \(\lambda\) is real, lies in the surface \(y^{3}+a z x^{2}+b x y z=0\). Would parameterisations (i) \(x=a-b \lambda, \quad y=-a \lambda+b \lambda^{2}, \quad z=\lambda^{3}\), (ii) \(x=-a-b \lambda, \quad y=-a \lambda-b \lambda^{2}, \quad z=\lambda^{3}\) do just as well?

Short Answer

Expert verified
After substituting and simplifying, you should find that the original parameterisation, as well as parameterisation (i), lies on the surface defined by the given equation. However, parameterisation (ii) does not satisfy these conditions and therefore does not fit the surface.

Step by step solution

01

Substitute the given parametric form into the equation

The parametric equations that were given are \(x=a+b \lambda\), \(y=a \lambda+b \lambda^{2}\), and \(z=-\lambda^{3}\). Substitute these into the equation \(y^{3}+a z x^{2}+b x y z=0\) and simplify.
02

Simplify the result

After substituting for \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\), the equation becomes quite complex. Simplify this equation by expanding the product terms and merging like terms.
03

Prove the equivalence

After simplification, the expression should ideally become 0, thereby proving the parameterised curve lies on the surface. If not, the statement provided in the problem is not correct.
04

Test the other parameterisations

In a similar way, test the other two parameterisations (i) and (ii) by substituting these forms into the surface formula and simplifying the expression to see if it equates to 0.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Mathematical Proofs
A mathematical proof is a logical argument demonstrating that a certain statement is true beyond all doubt, using a sequence of logical deductions from basic axioms and previously established theorems. In our exercise, the proof is utilized to show that a three-dimensional curve, defined parametrically, resides on a given surface. The proof proceeds in steps, starting with the substitution of the parametric equations into the surface equation.
Following the substitution, the next step involves simplifying the complex expression that emerges. This step requires careful algebraic manipulation, including expanding product terms and combining like terms, which lies within the realm of algebra, integral to the discipline of mathematics.
Finally, to prove the curve lies on the surface, we must demonstrate that the equation reduces to 0. This is where the proof becomes conclusive: if the simplification results in 0, the initial statement is verified; if not, the statement is disproven. This process demonstrates how mathematical proofs are constructed—beginning with assumptions, step-by-step deductions, and ending with a conclusive simplification that validates or invalidates the proposed theory.
The Role of Three-Dimensional Geometry
Three-dimensional (3D) geometry deals with shapes and objects in a space that has width, depth, and height. Therefore, it is a natural setting for discussing curves and surfaces, as in our case study.
In the given exercise, the effort is to ascertain the relationship between a 3D curve and a surface. Parametric equations are crucial in 3D geometry because they provide a clear framework to describe the position of points along a curve or surface.

Visualization in 3D Geometry

To better understand the exercise, visualizing the parametric curve and the surface can be highly beneficial. By imagining how the curve would 'fit' within the given surface, one reinforces their conceptual grasp and aids in the verification process of the proof. Using software to render these geometric entities could also provide an intuitive sense of their relations, adding a tangible aspect to the abstract mathematical concepts.
Visualization helps in appreciating the elegance of the geometry—how the parametric curve smoothly conforms to the surface, provided the proof holds true. When this harmony is visible or conceivable, it becomes easier to engage with and comprehend the underlying mathematics.
Calculus: A Tool for Verifying Curves and Surfaces
Calculus, with its concepts of differentiation and integration, is adept at dealing with continuous change and is hence a pivotal tool in verifying properties of curves and surfaces.
In the context of our textbook problem, we're not directly using tools from calculus to solve the problem, but the concept of a parameterization is a concept that comes from calculus. Parameterization allows us to represent a curve in terms of a single parameter, in this case, \(\lambda\).

Parameterization and Its Importance

Parameterization is a technique often employed in calculus to simplify the study of curves and surfaces. By using a parameter \(\lambda\), we allow for the description of a curve as it 'travels through space'. This treatment is particularly helpful when integrating or differentiating along the curve or when projecting 3D objects onto different planes for analysis.
Understanding the role of calculus concepts in parameterization and their applications can streamline the verification process in problems like the one we are exploring, also emphasizing the interconnectedness of mathematical disciplines in solving complex problems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are the roots of the equation \(x^{2}-6 x+2=0\), evaluate \(g(\alpha)\) and \(g(\beta)\) where $$ g(x)=\frac{x^{2}+2 x-8}{x-3} $$ giving your answer in its simplest form in terms of integers and surds.

The process of obtaining the standard form for a parabola from that for an ellipse consists of two major elements: (i) allowing the major axis to become infinitely long, i.e. \(a \rightarrow \infty\); (ii) moving the origin of coordinates so that it is coincident, with 'the left-hand end' \(P\) of the ellipse, rather than with its centre. (a) Write down a new equation for the standard ellipse in terms of \(a, e, y\) and \(X\) only; here \(X\) is a new \(x\)-coordinate defined so that the point \(P\) is at \(X=0\). (b) Note that the distance between the point \(P\) and the focus \(F\) nearest to it is \(a(1-e)\); denote this distance by \(A\) (c) Arrange the equation, expressed in terms of \(X, y, a, A\) and \(e\), so that it contains a term \(X^{2} / a\) (d) Finally, let \(a \rightarrow \infty\) and \(e \rightarrow 1\), to obtain \(y^{2}=4 A X\) for the equation of a parabola that passes through the origin and has the point \((A, 0)\) as its focus.

Show that the locus of points in three-dimensional Cartesian space given by the parameterisation $$ x=a u\left(3-u^{2}\right), \quad y=3 a u^{2}, \quad z=a u\left(3+u^{2}\right) $$ lies on the intersection of the surfaces \(y^{3}+27 a x z-81 a^{2} y=0\) and \(y=\lambda(z-x) /(z+x)\), where \(\lambda\) is a constant you should determine.

Continue the investigation of Equation (2.8), namely $$ g(x)=4 x^{3}+3 x^{2}-6 x-1=0 $$ as follows. (a) Make a table of values of \(g(x)\) for integer values of \(x\) between \(-2\) and 2 . Use it and the information derived in the text to draw a graph and so determine the roots of \(g(x)=0\) as accurately as possible. (b) Find one accurate root of \(g(x)=0\) by inspection and hence determine precise values for the other two roots. (c) Show that \(f(x)=4 x^{3}+3 x^{2}-6 x-k=0\) has only one real root unless \(-\frac{7}{4} \leq k \leq 5\)

If a sequence of terms, \(u_{n}\), satisfies the recurrence relation \(u_{n+1}=(1-x) u_{n}+\) \(n x\), with \(u_{1}=0\), show, by induction, that, for \(n \geq 1\), $$ u_{n}=\frac{1}{x}\left[n x-1+(1-x)^{n}\right] $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.