/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 67 Field from a cylindrical shell, ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Field from a cylindrical shell, right and wrong \(*\) " Find the electric field outside a uniformly charged hollow cylindrical shell with radius \(R\) and charge density \(\sigma\), an infinitesimal distance away from it. Do this in the following way. (a) Slice the shell into parallel infinite rods, and integrate the field contributions from all the rods. You should obtain the incorrect result of \(\sigma / 2 \epsilon_{0}\). (b) Why isn't the result correct? Explain how to modify it to obtain the correct result of \(\sigma / \epsilon_{0} .\) Hint: You could very well have performed the above integral in an effort to obtain the electric field an infinitesimal distance inside the cylinder, where we know the field is zero. Does the above integration provide a good description of what's going on for points on the shell that are very close to the point in question?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The error in the calculation of the electric field just outside a uniformly charged cylindrical shell using infinitesimal rods lies in the approximation of the cylinder as a group of linear charge distributions. To correct this, the curvature of the cylinder must be considered, leading to the correct result of \( \sigma / \epsilon_{0} \).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Cylinder

The cylindrical shell is uniformly charged with charge density \( \sigma \) and radius \( R \). The objective is to find the electric field just outside the surface, which involves integrating over small elements of the cylinder, representing it as infinitesimally thin rods.
02

Integrate the Field Contributions

Imagine slicing the shell into many infinitesimally thin rods. The electric field \( dE \) due to an infinitesimal slice can be given by Coulomb’s Law, \( dE = k dq / r^2 \). Suppose \( dq \) be the charge on the infinitesimal slice, and \( r \) be the distance of the field point from the slice. As the electric field is radially outward and same at all points, it is reasonable to consider all components along the diameter will cancel out, leaving only the axial field. Thus, \( E = \int dE \) leads to \( \sigma / 2 \epsilon_{0} \).
03

Analyzing the Incorrect Result

The obtained result \( \sigma / 2 \epsilon_{0}\) is incorrect. The error lies in the approximation of the cylinder as a group of linear charge distributions, which is not appropriate. The actual shape of the cylinder influences the electric field and must be considered.
04

Correcting the Error

To correct the error, consider the effect of the curvature of the cylinder on the electric field. The field components along the circumference do not entirely cancel each other out due to the cylindrical shape. Correcting the error leads to the correct result of \( \sigma / \epsilon_{0} \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cylindrical Shell
A cylindrical shell is a hollow tube with a defined radius and length. In this context, it's uniformly charged with a charge density denoted as \( \sigma \). This means the charge is evenly distributed along the surface of the cylinder.
Understanding the geometry of a cylindrical shell is crucial when calculating electric fields because the symmetry of the shape affects how the electric field propagates. When dealing with such a shell, especially in electrostatics, it's often sliced into smaller segments. This allows for easier calculation of field contributions from each segment, which can then be integrated to find the total electric field.
In this exercise, the shell is considered an infinite collection of parallel rods, where each rod contributes to the electric field at a point just outside the shell. This approach assumes the shell's infinite length in order to simplify calculations. However, this simplification can lead to inaccuracies if not handled carefully, as seen in the original exercise.
Charge Density
Charge density \( \sigma \) represents the amount of charge per unit area on the surface of an object. For our cylindrical shell, it's a key parameter because it directly influences the resulting electric field. The higher the charge density, the stronger the electric field produced.
Specifically, for a surface charge density on a cylindrical shell, the distribution of charges influences the field by spreading radially. This means the electric field will point outwards perpendicular to the curved surface of the cylinder.
When integrating over the cylindrical shell to find the electric field, acknowledging the charge density is essential. The total charge on any short segment of the shell is \( dq = \sigma \, dA \), where \( dA \) is a small area of the shell. Accurate calculations depend on correctly applying this concept.
Gauss's Law
Gauss's Law is a practical method to calculate electric fields, particularly for symmetrical charge distributions like a cylindrical shell. The law states that the electric flux through a closed surface is proportional to the charge enclosed by that surface. Mathematically, it is expressed as \( \Phi_E = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_0} \).
Applying Gauss's Law to a cylindrical shell requires finding a Gaussian surface that takes advantage of the shell’s symmetry. Usually, this is a coaxial cylindrical surface inside which the electric field is constant.
By using Gauss's Law correctly, the issue in the exercise with the integration approach can be resolved. The key is understanding how to construct the Gaussian surface for which the cylinder, in its entirety, is outside or inside. For instance, if the surface is outside and encloses the shell, the electric field outside is then \( \sigma / \epsilon_0 \), correcting the initial incorrect integration result.
Electrostatics
Electrostatics is the study of electric charges at rest and the electric fields they produce. In this context, it primarily deals with the forces, fields, and potentials arising from static charges, such as those distributed on a cylindrical shell.
Static charges give rise to an electric field, which can be visualized as lines emanating outward from a positively charged region or inward toward a negatively charged region. The strength and direction of this field depend on variables like charge distribution and geometry.
For the cylindrical shell in electrostatics, understanding how charges on a surface influence the field around it is fundamental. The shell's symmetrical charge distribution typically simplifies analyzing the field by using principles like superposition or Gauss’s Law.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Decreasing energy? A hollow spherical shell with radius \(R\) has charge \(Q\) uniformly distributed over it. The task of Problem \(1.32\) is to show that the energy stored in this system is \(Q^{2} / 8 \pi \epsilon_{0} R\). (You can derive this here if you want, or you can just accept it for the purposes of this problem.) Now imagine taking all of the charge and concentrating it in two point charges \(Q / 2\) located at diametrically opposite positions on the shell. The energy of this new system is \((Q / 2)^{2} / 4 \pi \epsilon_{0}(2 R)=\) \(Q^{2} / 32 \pi \epsilon_{0} R\), which is less than the energy of the uniform spherical shell. Does this make sense? If not, where is the error in this reasoning?

Field near a stick A stick with length \(2 \ell\) has uniform linear charge density \(\lambda\). Consider a point \(P\), a distance \(\eta \ell\) from the center (where \(0 \leq \eta<1\) ), and an infinitesimal distance away from the stick. Up close, the stick looks infinitely long, as far as the \(\mathrm{E}\) component perpendicular to the stick is concerned. So we have \(E_{\perp}=\lambda / 2 \pi \epsilon_{0} r\). Find the E component parallel to the stick, \(E_{I}\). Does it approach infinity, or does it remain finite at the end of the stick?

Zero force from a triangle ** Two positive ions and one negative ion are fixed at the vertices of an equilateral triangle. Where can a fourth ion be placed, along the symmetry axis of the setup, so that the force on it will be zero? Is there more than one such place? You will need to solve something numerically.

Hole in a plane : (a) A hole of radius \(R\) is cut out from a very large flat sheet with uniform charge density \(\sigma\). Let \(L\) be the line perpendicular to the sheet, passing through the center of the hole. What is the electric field at a point on \(L\), a distance \(z\) from the center of the hole? Hint: Consider the plane to consist of many concentric rings. (b) If a charge \(-q\) with mass \(m\) is released from rest on \(L\), very close to the center of the hole, show that it undergoes oscillatory motion, and find the frequency \(\omega\) of these oscillations. What is \(\omega\) if \(m=1 \mathrm{~g},-q=-10^{-8} \mathrm{C}, \sigma=10^{-6} \mathrm{C} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\), and \(R=0.1 \mathrm{~m} ?\) (c) If a charge \(-q\) with mass \(m\) is released from rest on \(L\), a distance \(z\) from the sheet, what is its speed when it passes through the center of the hole? What does your answer reduce to for large \(z\) (or, equivalently, small \(R\) )?

\(N\) charges on a circle \(N\) point charges, each with charge \(Q / N\), are evenly distributed around a circle of radius \(R\). What is the electric field at the location of one of the charges, due to all the others? (You can leave, your answer in the form of a sum.) In the \(N \rightarrow \infty\) limit, is the field infinite or finite? In the \(N \rightarrow \infty\) limit, is the force on one of the charges infinite or finite?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.