Like time dilation, length contraction cannot be seen directly by a single
observer. To explain this claim, imagine a rod of proper length
\(l_{\mathrm{o}}\) moving along the \(x\) axis of frame \(\mathcal{S}\) and an
observer standing away from the \(x\) axis and to the right of the whole rod.
Careful measurements of the rod's length at any one instant in frame
\(\mathcal{S}\) would, of course, give the result \(l=l_{\mathrm{o}} / \gamma\).
(a) Explain clearly why the light which reaches the observer's eye at any one
time must have left the two ends \(A\) and \(B\) of the rod at different times.
(b) Show that the observer would see (and a camera would record) a length more
than \(l\).
[It helps to imagine that the \(x\) axis is marked with a graduated scale.] (
\(\mathbf{c}\) ) Show that if the observer
is standing close beside the track, he will see a length that is actually more
than \(l_{\mathrm{o}}\); that is, the length contraction is distorted into an
expansion.