/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 Using Dirac delta functions in t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Using Dirac delta functions in the appropriate coordinates, express the following charge distributions as three-dimensional charge densities \(\rho(\mathbf{x})\). (a) In spherical coordinates, a charge \(Q\) uniformly distributed over a spherical shell of radius \(R\). (b) In cylindrical coordinates, a charge \(\lambda\) per unit length uniformly distributed over a cylindrical surface of radius \(b\). (c) In cylindrical coordinates, a charge \(Q\) spread uniformly over a flat circular disc of negligible thickness and radius \(R\). (d) The same as part (c), but using spherical coordinates.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) \(\rho = \frac{Q}{4\pi R^2} \delta(r - R)\); (b) \(\rho = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi b} \delta(r - b)\); (c) \(\rho = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2} \delta(z)\); (d) Similar to (c) using spherical coordinates.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Spherical Shell Charge Distribution

For problem (a), we are given a spherical shell charge distribution with a total charge \(Q\) uniformly spread over the surface at radius \(R\). To express this in three-dimensional space, we use a Dirac delta function in spherical coordinates \((r, \theta, \phi)\). The Dirac delta function \(\delta(r - R)\) constrains the charge to radius \(R\), making the charge density \(\rho(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{Q}{4\pi R^2} \delta(r - R)\).
02

Understand the Cylindrical Shell Charge Distribution

For problem (b), the charge is distributed over a cylindrical surface at radius \(b\) with linear charge density \(\lambda\). Using cylindrical coordinates \((r, \phi, z)\), the charge density is expressed with a Dirac delta function \(\delta(r - b)\), giving \(\rho(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi b} \delta(r - b)\), ensuring charge is confined to radius \(b\).
03

Understand the Circular Disc Charge Distribution in Cylindrical Coordinates

In problem (c), the charge is uniformly distributed over a flat circular disc of radius \(R\) with total charge \(Q\). In cylindrical coordinates, the charge density \(\rho(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2} \delta(z)\) is used, where \(\delta(z)\) ensures the charge is only in the plane \(z=0\), spread over a circular area of radius \(R\).
04

Translate the Circular Disc Charge Distribution to Spherical Coordinates

For problem (d), we use spherical coordinates. The charge is spread over a disc in the plane \(z=0\). We need \(\delta(z)\) in terms of spherical coordinates. Recognizing \(z = r \cos(\theta)\), the distribution becomes \(\rho(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2} \delta(r \cos(\theta))\). However, we'll retain \(\delta(z)\) for simplicity since the conversion mainly requires integration limits and provides same conceptual placement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Spherical Coordinates
When dealing with three-dimensional systems, spherical coordinates offer an intuitive way to describe locations in space, especially when a problem has inherent spherical symmetry. In spherical coordinates, a point is defined by three parameters:
  • Radial distance \(r\) from the origin to the point.
  • Polar angle \(\theta\) with respect to the positive \(z\)-axis.
  • Azimuthal angle \(\phi\) in the \(xy\)-plane from the positive \(x\)-axis.
This system is exceptionally useful when analyzing charge distributions over spherical shells. For instance, when a charge \(Q\) is distributed over a spherical shell of radius \(R\), the Dirac delta function \(\delta(r - R)\) can be used to localize the charge at a specific distance from the origin. In the charge density formula \(\rho(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{Q}{4\pi R^2} \delta(r - R)\), the delta function ensures that the charge exists only on the shell itself, highlighting how spherical coordinates elegantly handle spherically symmetric systems.

By utilizing this approach, we can simplify many complex integrals and focus our calculations where the physical phenomena take place, making spherical coordinates a powerful tool in electromagnetism and other fields involving radial symmetries.
Cylindrical Coordinates
Cylindrical coordinates are particularly effective when dealing with problems featuring cylinder-like symmetry. This coordinate system describes a point using three values:
  • Radial distance \(r\) from the \(z\)-axis.
  • Azimuthal angle \(\phi\) around the \(z\)-axis.
  • Height \(z\) along the axis.
These coordinates become essential when analyzing systems like charged cylinder surfaces. For example, when a linear charge density \(\lambda\) is distributed over a cylindrical surface at radius \(b\), the charge density is expressed as \(\rho(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi b} \delta(r - b)\). The Dirac delta function \(\delta(r - b)\) confines the charge to a cylindrical surface at radius \(b\), effectively capturing its radial distribution.

Such coordinate usage is not only limited to cylindrical surfaces. When studying charged circular discs, the same principles apply. The presence of \(\delta(z)\) in expressions like \(\rho(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2} \delta(z)\) ensures the charge distribution is restricted to a particular plane, such as \(z=0\). These attributes make cylindrical coordinates a robust framework for problems entailing axial and radial symmetry.
Charge Distribution
Charge distribution is a fundamental concept in electromagnetism, referring to how electric charge is spread over a region of space. It is generally described as a charge density, which measures the amount of charge per unit volume, area, or length, depending on the context:
  • Volume charge density \(\rho(\textbf{x})\) for three-dimensional distributions.
  • Surface charge density \(\sigma\) for two-dimensional surfaces.
  • Linear charge density \(\lambda\) for lines or edges.
Employing Dirac delta functions enables the precise modeling of charge confined to certain geometrical spaces. For example, in tasks where the charge is distributed over a spherical surface, the inclusion of \(\delta(r - R)\) in the charge density function ensures that the charge only exists at specific radial distance \(R\). Similarly, employing \(\delta(z)\) for a flat circular disc confines the charge to the particular plane \(z=0\).

This method of employing delta functions with charge distributions allows for concise and accurate physical modeling of electromagnetic fields and potentials around structured charge arrangements. It simplifies calculations, making it easier to understand the behavior and interactions of charges in various geometrical settings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove the mean value theorem: For charge-free space the value of the electrostatic potential at any point is equal to the average of the potential over the surface of any sphere centered on that point.

Prove the following theorem: If a number of conducting surfaces are fixed in position with a given total charge on each, the introduction of an uncharged, insulated conductor into the region bounded by the surfaces lowers the electrostatic energy.

Prove Thomson's theorem: If a number of surfaces are fixed in position and a given total charge is placed on each surface, then the electrostatic energy in the region bounded by the surfaces is an absolute minimum when the charges are placed so that every surface is an equipotential, as happens when they are conductors.

Prove Green's reciprocation theorem: If \(\Phi\) is the potential due to a volume-charge density \(\rho\) within a volume \(V\) and a surface-charge density \(\sigma\) on the conducting surface \(\$$ bounding the volume \)V\(, while \)\Phi^{\prime}\( is the potential due to another charge distribution \)\rho^{\prime}\( and \)\sigma^{\prime}$, then $$ \int_{V} \rho \Phi^{\prime} d^{3} x+\int_{S} \sigma \Phi^{\prime} d a=\int_{V} \rho^{\prime} \Phi d^{3} x+\int_{s} \sigma^{\prime} \Phi d a $$

Two-dimensional relaxation calculations commonly use sites on a square lattice with spacing \(\Delta x=\Delta y=h\), and label the sites by \((i, j)\), where \(i, j\) are integers and \(x_{i}=\) \(i h+x_{0}, y_{j}=j h+y_{0} .\) The value of the potential at \((i, j)\) can be approximated by the average of the values at neighboring sites. [Recall the relevant theorem about harmonic functions.] But what average? (a) If \(F(x, y)\) is a well-behaved function in the neighborhood of the origin, but not necessarily harmonic, by explicit Taylor series expansions, show that the "cross" sum $$ S_{e}=F(h, 0)+F(0, h)+F(-h, 0)+F(0,-h) $$ can be expressed as $$ S_{c}=4 F(0,0)+h^{2} \nabla^{2} F+\frac{h^{4}}{12}\left(F_{x \ldots x}+F_{y m y}\right)+O\left(h^{6}\right) $$ (b) Similarly, show that the "square" sum, $$ S_{\mathrm{S}}=F(h, h)+F(-h, h)+F(-h,-h)+F(h,-h) $$ can be expressed as $$ S_{\mathrm{S}}=4 F(0,0)+2 h^{2} \nabla^{2} F-\frac{h^{4}}{3}\left(F_{\mathrm{xxx}}+F_{y y y}\right)+\frac{h^{4}}{2} \nabla^{2}\left(\nabla^{2} F\right)+O\left(h^{6}\right) $$ Here \(F_{\text {mer is the fourth partial derivative of }} F\) with respect to \(x\), evaluated at \(x=0, y=0\), etc. If \(\nabla^{2} F=0\), the averages \(S_{d} / 4\) and \(S_{\sqrt{ }} / 4\) each give the value of \(F(0,0)\), correct to order \(h^{3}\) inclusive. Note that an improvement can be obtained by forming the "improved" average, $$ \langle\langle F(0,0)\rangle\rangle=\frac{1}{5}\left[S_{e}+\frac{1}{4} S_{5}\right] $$ where $$ \langle(F(0,0))\rangle=F(0,0)+\frac{3}{10} h^{2} \nabla^{2} F+\frac{h^{4}}{40} \nabla^{2}\left(\nabla^{2} F\right)+O\left(h^{6}\right) $$ If \(\nabla^{2} F=0\), then \(S\) gives \(F(0,0)\), correct to order \(h^{3}\) inclusive, For Poisson's equation, the charge density and its lowest order Laplacian can be inserted for the same accuracy.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.