/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 2.27  Rather than insisting that all... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Rather than insisting that all the molecules be in the left half of a container, suppose we only require that they be in the leftmost 99%(leaving the remaining 1%completely empty). What is the probability of finding such an arrangement if there are 100molecules in the container? What if there are 10,000molecules? What if there are 1023?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  • The expression of molecules is

Step by step solution

01

The statistical mechanics 

The number of microstates available to an Nmolecule 3-dideal gas with energy Ucontained in volume Vis approximately:

Ω=VNN!h3Nπ3N23N2!(2mU)3N2

Separating out the factors that depend only on N, we can write this as:

where, Ω(U,V,N)=f(N)VNU3N2f(N)=(2πm)3N23N2!N!h3N

Since one of the assumptions of statistical mechanics is that all microstates are equally probable, it should be possible, just by change, to find that even if a gas has a total volume V available to it, sometimes all the molecules will clump up in some smaller portion of the volume, leaving the remaining space empty (a vacuum). How likely is this to happen?

02

Step :2 The probability of spontaneous

Effectively, what we're asking is how likely is it that the volume occupied by the gas will spontaneously reduce from Vto aV, where0<a<1. Since the volume is all that changes (both Nand Uare unchanged), we can look at formula (1)and find that reducing the volume reduces multiplicity to:

Ω(U,V,N)=f(N)(aV)NU3N2

Thus the probability that this will happen spontaneously is :

substitute equation (1), localid="1650265451996" P(a)=Ω(a)ΩP(a)=(aV)N(V)N=aN

03

Step :3 Expression of equation 

Since Nis a large number, even a value of a close to 1is still very unlikely. For example, if a=0.99we find:

For N=100:

P(0.99)=0.99100=0.366

For N=10000:

P(0.99)=0.9910000=2.248×10-44

ForN=1023:

P(0.99)=0.9910230.991023=10-x

take the natural logarithm for both sides:

localid="1650267033492" 1023ln(0.99)=-xln(10)-0.01×1023=-x×2.3x=4.348×1020

the probability is therefore:

P(0.99)=10-4.348×1020

04

Step :4 Draw the sketch 

In fact, even for only 100molecules, the chance of the gas crowding into a smaller volume is virtually zero for a<0.95as we can see from a plot:

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Calculate the number of possible five-card poker hands, dealt from a deck of 52 cards. (The order of cards in a hand does not matter.) A royal flush consists of the five highest-ranking cards (ace, king, queen, jack, 10) of any one of the four suits. What is the probability of being dealt a royal flush (on the first deal)?

Consider again the system of two large, identical Einstein solids treated in Problem 2.22.

(a) For the case N=1023, compute the entropy of this system (in terms of Boltzmann's constant), assuming that all of the microstates are allowed. (This is the system's entropy over long time scales.)

(b) Compute the entropy again, assuming that the system is in its most likely macro state. (This is the system's entropy over short time scales, except when there is a large and unlikely fluctuation away from the most likely macro state.)

(c) Is the issue of time scales really relevant to the entropy of this system?

(d) Suppose that, at a moment when the system is near its most likely macro state, you suddenly insert a partition between the solids so that they can no longer exchange energy. Now, even over long time scales, the entropy is given by your answer to part (b). Since this number is less than your answer to part (a), you have, in a sense, caused a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. Is this violation significant? Should we lose any sleep over it?

According to the Sackur-Tetrode equation, the entropy of a monatomic ideal gas can become negative when its temperature (and hence its energy) is sufficiently low. Of course this is absurd, so the Sackur-Tetrode equation must be invalid at very low temperatures. Suppose you start with a sample of helium at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, then lower the temperature holding the density fixed. Pretend that the helium remains a gas and does not liquefy. Below what temperature would the Sackur-Tetrode equation predict that Sis negative? (The behavior of gases at very low temperatures is the main subject of Chapter 7.)

Use Stirling's approximation to find an approximate formula for the multiplicity of a two-state paramagnet. Simplify this formula in the limit N↓≪Nto obtain Ω≈Ne/N↓N↓. This result should look very similar to your answer to Problem 2.17; explain why these two systems, in the limits considered, are essentially the same.

For an Einstein solid with each of the following values of N and q , list all of the possible microstates, count them, and verify formula Ω(N,q)=q+N−1q=(q+N−1)!q!(N−1)!

(a) N=3,q=4

(b)N=3,q=5

(c) N=3,q=6

(d) N=4,q=2

(e) N=4,q=3

(f) N=1,q=anything

(g) N= anything, q=1

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.