/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 2.27  Rather than insisting that all... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Rather than insisting that all the molecules be in the left half of a container, suppose we only require that they be in the leftmost 99%(leaving the remaining 1%completely empty). What is the probability of finding such an arrangement if there are 100molecules in the container? What if there are 10,000molecules? What if there are 1023?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  • The expression of molecules is

Step by step solution

01

The statistical mechanics 

The number of microstates available to an Nmolecule 3-dideal gas with energy Ucontained in volume Vis approximately:

Ω=VNN!h3Nπ3N23N2!(2mU)3N2

Separating out the factors that depend only on N, we can write this as:

where, Ω(U,V,N)=f(N)VNU3N2f(N)=(2πm)3N23N2!N!h3N

Since one of the assumptions of statistical mechanics is that all microstates are equally probable, it should be possible, just by change, to find that even if a gas has a total volume V available to it, sometimes all the molecules will clump up in some smaller portion of the volume, leaving the remaining space empty (a vacuum). How likely is this to happen?

02

Step :2 The probability of spontaneous

Effectively, what we're asking is how likely is it that the volume occupied by the gas will spontaneously reduce from Vto aV, where0<a<1. Since the volume is all that changes (both Nand Uare unchanged), we can look at formula (1)and find that reducing the volume reduces multiplicity to:

Ω(U,V,N)=f(N)(aV)NU3N2

Thus the probability that this will happen spontaneously is :

substitute equation (1), localid="1650265451996" P(a)=Ω(a)ΩP(a)=(aV)N(V)N=aN

03

Step :3 Expression of equation 

Since Nis a large number, even a value of a close to 1is still very unlikely. For example, if a=0.99we find:

For N=100:

P(0.99)=0.99100=0.366

For N=10000:

P(0.99)=0.9910000=2.248×10-44

ForN=1023:

P(0.99)=0.9910230.991023=10-x

take the natural logarithm for both sides:

localid="1650267033492" 1023ln(0.99)=-xln(10)-0.01×1023=-x×2.3x=4.348×1020

the probability is therefore:

P(0.99)=10-4.348×1020

04

Step :4 Draw the sketch 

In fact, even for only 100molecules, the chance of the gas crowding into a smaller volume is virtually zero for a<0.95as we can see from a plot:

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use a computer to produce a table and graph, like those in this section, for the case where one Einstein solid contains 200 oscillators, the other contains100 oscillators, and there are 100 units of energy in total. What is the most probable macrostate, and what is its probability? What is the least probable macrostate, and what is its probability?

Suppose you flip1000 coins.
a What is the probability of getting exactly 500heads and 500tails? (Hint: First write down a formula for the total number of possible outcomes. Then, to determine the "multiplicity" of the 500-500"macrostate," use Stirling's approximation. If you have a fancy calculator that makes Stirling's approximation unnecessary, multiply all the numbers in this problem by 10, or 100, or1000, until Stirling's approximation becomes necessary.)
bWhat is the probability of getting exactly 600heads and400 tails?

Suppose you flip four fair coins.

(a) Make a list of all the possible outcomes, as in Table 2.1.

(b) Make a list of all the different "macrostates" and their probabilities.

(c) Compute the multiplicity of each macrostate using the combinatorial formula 2.6, and check that these results agree with what you got by bruteforce counting.

A black hole is a region of space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape. Throwing something into a black hole is therefore an irreversible process, at least in the everyday sense of the word. In fact, it is irreversible in the thermodynamic sense as well: Adding mass to a black hole increases the black hole's entropy. It turns out that there's no way to tell (at least from outside) what kind of matter has gone into making a black hole. Therefore, the entropy of a black hole must be greater than the entropy of any conceivable type of matter that could have been used to create it. Knowing this, it's not hard to estimate the entropy of a black hole.
aUse dimensional analysis to show that a black hole of mass Mshould have a radius of order GM/c2, where Gis Newton's gravitational constant and cis the speed of light. Calculate the approximate radius of a one-solar-mass black holeM=2×1030kg .
bIn the spirit of Problem 2.36, explain why the entropy of a black hole, in fundamental units, should be of the order of the maximum number of particles that could have been used to make it.

cTo make a black hole out of the maximum possible number of particles, you should use particles with the lowest possible energy: long-wavelength photons (or other massless particles). But the wavelength can't be any longer than the size of the black hole. By setting the total energy of the photons equal toMc2 , estimate the maximum number of photons that could be used to make a black hole of mass M. Aside from a factor of 8Ï€2, your result should agree with the exact formula for the entropy of a black hole, obtained* through a much more difficult calculation:

Sb.h.=8Ï€2GM2hck

d Calculate the entropy of a one-solar-mass black hole, and comment on the result.

Consider again the system of two large, identical Einstein solids treated in Problem 2.22.

(a) For the case N=1023, compute the entropy of this system (in terms of Boltzmann's constant), assuming that all of the microstates are allowed. (This is the system's entropy over long time scales.)

(b) Compute the entropy again, assuming that the system is in its most likely macro state. (This is the system's entropy over short time scales, except when there is a large and unlikely fluctuation away from the most likely macro state.)

(c) Is the issue of time scales really relevant to the entropy of this system?

(d) Suppose that, at a moment when the system is near its most likely macro state, you suddenly insert a partition between the solids so that they can no longer exchange energy. Now, even over long time scales, the entropy is given by your answer to part (b). Since this number is less than your answer to part (a), you have, in a sense, caused a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. Is this violation significant? Should we lose any sleep over it?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.