/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 2.1 Suppose you flip four fair coins... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose you flip four fair coins.

(a) Make a list of all the possible outcomes, as in Table 2.1.

(b) Make a list of all the different "macrostates" and their probabilities.

(c) Compute the multiplicity of each macrostate using the combinatorial formula 2.6, and check that these results agree with what you got by bruteforce counting.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Determine the multiplicity of each macrostate and ensure that the result is agree with got by brute force counting is

Ω(0tails)=Ω(4,0)=40=1Ω(1tails)=Ω(4,1)=41=4Ω(2tails)=Ω(4,2)=42=6Ω(3tails)=Ω(4,3)=43=4Ω(4tails)=Ω(4,4)=44=1

Step by step solution

01

Step1:Given data

Assume we have four distinguishable fair (equally likely to land heads or tails) coins. There are two if we flip all four. 24=16possible outcomes, because each coin has two possible states and the four coins are distinct from one another Each of these states is referred to as a microstate. On the other hand, we might be more interested in the total number of heads or tails rather than which coins came up in either state. In this case, we'd only be interested in the overall condition of the four coin collection.

02

Step2:Possible outcomes(part a)

(a)

03

Step3:Macrostate possibilities(part b)

(b)To make things easier to count, I converted the four coin states into binary numbers usingH=0 andT=1, then simply counted how many times each number appeared. for example:

- if the sum =0, so we have0tails.

- if the sum=1so we have1tails.

- if the sum =2, so we have 2tails.

- if the sum=3,so we have3tails.

- if the sum=4, so we have3tails.

04

Step4:possible outcomes(part b)

05

Step5:final probability(part b)

06

Step6:multiplicity macrostate(part c)

(c) In general, we can calculate the probability of getting n heads in N coin flips. The problem can be thought of as the number of ways to choose n coins from a total of N and make these n coins the heads with the remaining N-n tails. We have N coins to choose from for the first of the n coins, so there are N ways to make this first selection. With that first coin selected, there areN-1coins from which we can select the next head, and so on, until we reach the final head. for which we have N-n+1choices. Thus the number of ways of choosing n coins from N in which the order of the choice does matter is:

N(N−1)…(N−n+1)=N!(N−1)!

However, for a given macrostate, the order in which we choose the heads is irrelevant, and because there are n! ways to order each of the macrostates, the actual number of ways to choose the macrostate with n heads isΩ(N,n)=N!(N−1)!n!=Nn

That is, Ω(N,n)is the binomial coefficientNn. So the multiplicity of macrostates:

Ω(0tails)=Ω(4,0)=40=1Ω(1tails)=Ω(4,1)=41=4Ω(2tails)=Ω(4,2)=42=6Ω(3tails)=Ω(4,3)=43=4Ω(4tails)=Ω(4,4)=44=1

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Compute the entropy of a mole of helium at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, pretending that all the atoms are distinguishable. Compare to the actual entropy, for indistinguishable atoms, computed in the text.

Show that during the quasistatic isothermal expansion of a monatomic ideal gas, the change in entropy is related to the heat input Qby the simple formula

∆s=QT

In the following chapter I'll prove that this formula is valid for any quasistatic process. Show, however, that it is not valid for the free expansion process described above.

Consider again the system of two large, identical Einstein solids treated in Problem 2.22.

(a) For the case N=1023, compute the entropy of this system (in terms of Boltzmann's constant), assuming that all of the microstates are allowed. (This is the system's entropy over long time scales.)

(b) Compute the entropy again, assuming that the system is in its most likely macro state. (This is the system's entropy over short time scales, except when there is a large and unlikely fluctuation away from the most likely macro state.)

(c) Is the issue of time scales really relevant to the entropy of this system?

(d) Suppose that, at a moment when the system is near its most likely macro state, you suddenly insert a partition between the solids so that they can no longer exchange energy. Now, even over long time scales, the entropy is given by your answer to part (b). Since this number is less than your answer to part (a), you have, in a sense, caused a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. Is this violation significant? Should we lose any sleep over it?

Use a computer to reproduce the table and graph in Figure2.4: two Einstein solids, each containing three harmonic oscillators, with a total of six units of energy. Then modify the table and graph to show the case where one Einstein solid contains six harmonic oscillators and the other contains four harmonic oscillators (with the total number of energy units still equal to six). Assuming that all microstates are equally likely, what is the most probable macrostate, and what is its probability? What is the least probable macrostate, and what is its probability?

A black hole is a region of space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape. Throwing something into a black hole is therefore an irreversible process, at least in the everyday sense of the word. In fact, it is irreversible in the thermodynamic sense as well: Adding mass to a black hole increases the black hole's entropy. It turns out that there's no way to tell (at least from outside) what kind of matter has gone into making a black hole. Therefore, the entropy of a black hole must be greater than the entropy of any conceivable type of matter that could have been used to create it. Knowing this, it's not hard to estimate the entropy of a black hole.
aUse dimensional analysis to show that a black hole of mass Mshould have a radius of order GM/c2, where Gis Newton's gravitational constant and cis the speed of light. Calculate the approximate radius of a one-solar-mass black holeM=2×1030kg .
bIn the spirit of Problem 2.36, explain why the entropy of a black hole, in fundamental units, should be of the order of the maximum number of particles that could have been used to make it.

cTo make a black hole out of the maximum possible number of particles, you should use particles with the lowest possible energy: long-wavelength photons (or other massless particles). But the wavelength can't be any longer than the size of the black hole. By setting the total energy of the photons equal toMc2 , estimate the maximum number of photons that could be used to make a black hole of mass M. Aside from a factor of 8Ï€2, your result should agree with the exact formula for the entropy of a black hole, obtained* through a much more difficult calculation:

Sb.h.=8Ï€2GM2hck

d Calculate the entropy of a one-solar-mass black hole, and comment on the result.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.