/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 7.15 For a system obeying Boltzmann s... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For a system obeying Boltzmann statistics, we know what μis from Chapter 6. Suppose, though, that you knew the distribution function (equation 7.31) but didn't know μ. You could still determine μ by requiring that the total number of particles, summed over all single-particle states, equal N. Carry out this calculation, to rederive the formula μ=-kTlnZ1/N. (This is normally how μ is determined in quantum statistics, although the math is usually more difficult.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The formulaμ=-kTlogeZ1Nis derived.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given Information 

We are given a formula,

μ=-kTlnZ1/N

02

Step 2. Deriving the formula

According to Boltzmann statistics, the average number of particles in the single state is determined by Boltzmann distribution function,

n¯Boltzmann=e-(ε-μ)kT

N is the total number of particles, summed over all single-particle states,

N=∑sexp-(ε(s)-μ)kT=∑sexpμkTexp-ε(s)kT=expμkT∑sexp-ε(s)kT=expμkTZ1

As Z1=∑exp-ε(s)kT,

03

Step 3. Simplifying

Simplifying, we get

NZ1=μkTlogNZ1=μkT-logeZ1N=μkTμ=-kTlogeZ1N

Hence, the formula is derived.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider two single-particle states, A and B, in a system of fermions, where ϵA=μ-xand ϵB=μ+x; that is, level A lies below μ by the same amount that level B lies above μ. Prove that the probability of level B being occupied is the same as the probability of level A being unoccupied. In other words, the Fermi-Dirac distribution is "symmetrical" about the point where ϵ=μ.

In Section 6.5 I derived the useful relation F=-kTln(Z)between the Helmholtz free energy and the ordinary partition function. Use analogous argument to prove that ϕ=-kT×ln(Z^), where Z^ is the grand partition function and ϕis the grand free energy introduced in Problem 5.23.

A ferromagnet is a material (like iron) that magnetizes spontaneously, even in the absence of an externally applied magnetic field. This happens because each elementary dipole has a strong tendency to align parallel to its neighbors. At t=0the magnetization of a ferromagnet has the maximum possible value, with all dipoles perfectly lined up; if there are Natoms, the total magnetization is typically~2μeN, where µa is the Bohr magneton. At somewhat higher temperatures, the excitations take the form of spin waves, which can be visualized classically as shown in Figure 7.30. Like sound waves, spin waves are quantized: Each wave mode can have only integer multiples of a basic energy unit. In analogy with phonons, we think of the energy units as particles, called magnons. Each magnon reduces the total spin of the system by one unit of h21rand therefore reduces the magnetization by ~2μe. However, whereas the frequency of a sound wave is inversely proportional to its wavelength, the frequency of a spin-wave is proportional to the square of 1λ.. (in the limit of long wavelengths). Therefore, since∈=hfand p=hλ.. for any "particle," the energy of a magnon is proportional

In the ground state of a ferromagnet, all the elementary dipoles point in the same direction. The lowest-energy excitations above the ground state are spin waves, in which the dipoles precess in a conical motion. A long-wavelength spin wave carries very little energy because the difference in direction between neighboring dipoles is very small.

to the square of its momentum. In analogy with the energy-momentum relation for an ordinary nonrelativistic particle, we can write ∈=p22pm*, wherem* is a constant related to the spin-spin interaction energy and the atomic spacing. For iron, m* turns out to equal 1.24×1029kg, about14times the mass of an electron. Another difference between magnons and phonons is that each magnon ( or spin-wave mode) has only one possible polarization.

(a) Show that at low temperatures, the number of magnons per unit volume in a three-dimensional ferromagnet is given by

NmV=2π2m×kTh232∫0∞xex-1dx.

Evaluate the integral numerically.

(b) Use the result of part (a) to find an expression for the fractional reduction in magnetization, (M(O)-M(T))/M(O).Write your answer in the form (T/To)32, and estimate the constantT0for iron.

(c) Calculate the heat capacity due to magnetic excitations in a ferromagnet at low temperature. You should find Cv/Nk=(T/Ti)32, where Tidiffers from To only by a numerical constant. EstimateTifor iron, and compare the magnon and phonon contributions to the heat capacity. (The Debye temperature of iron is 470k.)

(d) Consider a two-dimensional array of magnetic dipoles at low temperature. Assume that each elementary dipole can still point in any (threedimensional) direction, so spin waves are still possible. Show that the integral for the total number of magnons diverge in this case. (This result is an indication that there can be no spontaneous magnetization in such a two-dimensional system. However, in Section 8.2we will consider a different two-dimensional model in which magnetization does occur.)

The previous two problems dealt with pure semiconductors, also called intrinsic semiconductors. Useful semiconductor devices are instead made from doped semiconductors, which contain substantial numbers of impurity atoms. One example of a doped semiconductor was treated in Problem 7.5. Let us now consider that system again. (Note that in Problem 7.5 we measured all energies relative to the bottom of the conduction band, Ee. We also neglected the distinction between g0and g0c; this simplification happens to be ok for conduction electrons in silicon.)

(a) Calculate and plot the chemical potential as afunction of temperature, for silicon doped with 1017phosphorus atoms per cm3(as in Problem 7.5). Continue to assume that the conduction electrons can be treated as an ordinary ideal gas.

(b) Discuss whether it is legitimate to assume for this system that the conduction electrons can be treated asan ordinary ideal gas, as opposed to a Fermi gas. Give some numerical examples.

(c)Estimate the temperature at which the number of valence electrons excitedto the conduction band would become comparable to the number ofconduction electrons from donor impurities. Which source of conductionelectrons is more important at room temperature?

(a) Estimate (roughly) the total power radiated by your body, neglecting any energy that is returned by your clothes and environment. (Whatever the color of your skin, its emissivity at infrared wavelengths is quite close to 1; almost any nonmetal is a near-perfect blackbody at these wavelengths.)

(b) Compare the total energy radiated by your body in one day (expressed in kilocalories) to the energy in the food you cat. Why is there such a large discrepancy?

(c) The sun has a mass of 2×1030kgand radiates energy at a rate of 3.9×1026watts. Which puts out more power per units mass-the sun or your body?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.