/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 31 Please provide the following inf... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Please provide the following information for Problems. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. (b) Check Requirements What sampling distribution will you use? What assumptions are you making? Compute the sample test statistic and corresponding \(z\) or \(t\) value as appropriate. (c) Find (or estimate) the \(P\) -value. Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to the \(P\) -value. (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level \(\alpha ?\) (e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. Note: For degrees of freedom \(d . f .\) not in the Student's \(t\) table, use the closest \(d . f .\) that is smaller. In some situations, this choice of \(d . f .\) may increase the \(P\) -value a small amount and therefore produce a slightly more "conservative" answer. Sociology: High School Dropouts This problem is based on information taken from Life in America's Fifty States by G. S. Thomas. A random sample of \(n_{1}=153\) people ages 16 to 19 was taken from the island of Oahu, Hawaii, and 12 were found to be high school dropouts. Another random sample of \(n_{2}=128\) people ages 16 to 19 was taken from Sweetwater County, Wyoming, and 7 were found to be high school dropouts. Do these data indicate that the population proportion of high school dropouts on Oahu is different (either way) from that of Sweetwater County? Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance.

Short Answer

Expert verified
We fail to reject the null hypothesis; the dropout proportions are not significantly different at the 1% level.

Step by step solution

01

Define Level of Significance and Hypotheses

The level of significance is \( \alpha = 0.01 \).The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) states that the population proportions of high school dropouts on Oahu and Sweetwater County are equal: \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \).The alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) states that the population proportions are not equal: \( H_a: p_1 eq p_2 \).
02

Check Requirements and Determine Distribution

For proportions comparison, we will use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution (z-test) since both sample sizes are large enough for normal approximation:* Oahu: \( n_1 = 153 \), \( x_1 = 12 \)* Sweetwater: \( n_2 = 128 \), \( x_2 = 7 \)Assumptions: The samples are random, independent, and the sample sizes are considered large enough under the binomial assumption to apply a normal approximation (\( np \) and \( n(1-p) \) are greater than 5 for both samples).
03

Compute the Sample Test Statistic

Compute the sample proportions: \( \hat{p}_1 = \frac{12}{153} \approx 0.0784 \) and \( \hat{p}_2 = \frac{7}{128} \approx 0.0547 \).The pooled sample proportion is:\[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{12 + 7}{153 + 128} \approx 0.067 \]The test statistic (z-score) is:\[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})\left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)}} \]\[ z = \frac{0.0784 - 0.0547}{\sqrt{0.067 \times (1-0.067) \left(\frac{1}{153} + \frac{1}{128}\right)}} \approx 0.971 \]
04

Calculate the P-value

The test statistic \( z \approx 0.971 \) is used to determine the \( P \)-value, considering both tails of the standard normal distribution due to the two-tailed test.The \( P \)-value is approximately \( 2 \times P(Z > 0.971) \approx 0.331 \). This value can be found using a standard normal distribution table or calculator.
05

Decision to Reject or Fail to Reject Null Hypothesis

Since the \( P \)-value of \( 0.331 \) is greater than our significance level \( \alpha = 0.01 \), we fail to reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \).
06

Interpretation of Conclusion

The conclusion is that there is not enough statistical evidence at the 1% significance level to suggest that the proportion of high school dropouts on Oahu is different from that of Sweetwater County.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Level of Significance
In hypothesis testing, the level of significance, denoted as \( \alpha \), is a threshold set before conducting a test. It determines how much risk of error you are willing to accept when drawing a conclusion. Essentially, it's the probability of making a Type I error, which occurs when you incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis. For example, a 1% level of significance means you accept a 1% risk of concluding that a relationship or effect exists when it actually does not.

  • A smaller \( \alpha \) level signifies a more stringent criterion, reducing the chance of committing a Type I error but increasing the risk of a Type II error (failing to reject a false null hypothesis).
  • In the given problem, \( \alpha = 0.01 \), indicating that strong evidence is required to reject the null hypothesis.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) and the alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) are foundational components of hypothesis testing. The null hypothesis posits that there is no effect or difference, serving as a default or starting assumption that will only be rejected if evidence strongly contradicts it.
The alternative hypothesis represents the conclusion you might reach if the evidence allows you to reject the null hypothesis. It suggests there is a meaningful effect or difference.

  • In the exercise, the null hypothesis is \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \), suggesting that the proportions of high school dropouts in Oahu and Sweetwater County are equal.
  • The alternative hypothesis is \( H_a: p_1 eq p_2 \), indicating that the proportions are different.
Essentially, you are testing whether the data provide sufficient evidence to support the claim of a difference in dropout proportions between the two regions.
P-value
The \( P \)-value is a crucial aspect of hypothesis testing. It measures the probability of observing the test results, or something more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

A smaller \( P \)-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis. In technical terms, if the \( P \)-value is less than or equal to \( \alpha \), the null hypothesis is rejected. However, if it is greater, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

  • From the problem, the calculated \( P \)-value is approximately \( 0.331 \).
  • Since this \( P \)-value exceeds the \( 1\% \) level of significance, we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Z-test
The Z-test is a statistical procedure used to decide whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis when comparing sample proportions or means. For proportion comparisons, like in our scenario, the Z-test helps determine if any observed difference in sample proportions is statistically significant.

  • It is based on the standard normal distribution, which is why it requires the calculation of a Z-score - a value representing how many standard deviations an element is from the mean.
  • In our exercise, we used a Z-test due to the sufficiently large sample sizes, allowing for a normal approximation of the binomial distribution.
The calculated Z-score from the problem is approximately \( 0.971 \). This value is then used to find the corresponding \( P \)-value, which ultimately helps in making a decision about the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Please provide the following information. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. Will you use a left-tailed, right-tailed, or two-tailed test? (b) What sampling distribution will you use? Explain the rationale for your choice of sampling distribution. Compute the \(z\) value of the sample test statistic. (c) Find (or estimate) the \(P\) -value. Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to the \(P\) -value. (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level \(\alpha ?\) (e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. Total blood volume (in ml) per body weight (in \(\mathrm{kg}\) ) is important in medical research. For healthy adults, the red blood cell volume mean is about \(\mu=28 \mathrm{ml} / \mathrm{kg}\) (Reference: Laboratory and Diagnostic Tests by F. Fischbach). Red blood cell volume that is too low or too high can indicate a medical problem (see reference). Suppose that Roger has had seven blood tests, and the red blood cell volumes were $$\begin{array}{rrrrrr} 32 & 25 & 41 & 35 & 30 & 37 & 29 \end{array}$$ The sample mean is \(\bar{x} \approx 32.7 \mathrm{ml} / \mathrm{kg} .\) Let \(x\) be a random variable that represents Roger's red blood cell volume. Assume that \(x\) has a normal distribution and \(\sigma=4.75 .\) Do the data indicate that Roger's red blood cell volume is different (either way) from \(\mu=28 \mathrm{ml} / \mathrm{kg} ?\) Use a 0.01 level of significance.

When using the Student's \(t\) distribution to test \(\mu,\) what value do you use for the degrees of freedom?

Unfortunately, arsenic occurs naturally in some ground water (Reference: Union Carbide Technical Report \(K / U R-1\) ). A mean arsenic level of \(\mu=8.0\) parts per billion (ppb) is considered safe for agricultural use. A well in Texas is used to water cotton crops. This well is tested on a regular basis for arsenic. A random sample of 37 tests gave a sample mean of \(\bar{x}=7.2 \mathrm{ppb}\) arsenic, with \(s=1.9 \mathrm{ppb} .\) Does this information indicate that the mean level of arsenic in this well is less than 8 ppb? Use \(\alpha=0.01.\)

A random sample of size 16 from a normal distribution with \(\sigma=3\) produced a sample mean of 4.5 (a) Check Requirements Is the \(\bar{x}\) distribution normal? Explain. (b) Compute the sample test statistic \(z\) under the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \mu=6.3\) (c) For \(H_{1}: \mu<6.3,\) estimate the \(P\) -value of the test statistic. (d) For a level of significance of 0.01 and the hypotheses of parts (b) and (c), do you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Explain.

Please provide the following information. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. (b) Check Requirements What sampling distribution will you use? Do you think the sample size is sufficiently large? Explain. Compute the value of the sample test statistic and corresponding \(z\) value. (c) Find the \(P\)-value of the test statistic. Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to the \(P\)-value. (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level \(\alpha ?\) (e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. Focus Problem: Benford's Law Again, suppose you are the auditor for a very large corporation. The revenue file contains millions of numbers in a large computer data bank (see Problem 7). You draw a random sample of \(n=228\) numbers from this file and \(r=92\) have a first nonzero digit of \(1 .\) Let \(p\) represent the population proportion of all numbers in the computer file that have a leading digit of \(1 .\) i. Test the claim that \(p\) is more than \(0.301 .\) Use \(\alpha=0.01.\) ii. If \(p\) is in fact larger than \(0.301,\) it would seem there are too many numbers in the file with leading Is. Could this indicate that the books have been "cooked" by artificially lowering numbers in the file? Comment from the point of view of the Internal Revenue Service. Comment from the perspective of the Federal Bureau of Investigation as it looks for "profit skimming" by unscrupulous employees. iii. Comment on the following statement: "If we reject the null hypothesis at level of significance \(\alpha,\) we have not proved \(H_{0}\) to be false. We can say that the probability is \(\alpha\) that we made a mistake in rejecting \(H_{0}\) " Based on the outcome of the test, would you recommend further investigation before accusing the company of fraud?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.