/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 Consider two independent binomia... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider two independent binomial experiments. In the first one, 40 trials had 10 successes. In the second one, 50 trials had 15 successes. (a) Is it appropriate to use a normal distribution to approximate the \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\) distribution? Explain. (b) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) (c) Based on the confidence interval you computed, can you be \(90 \%\) confident that \(p_{1}\) is less than \(p_{2}\) ? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, normal approximation is appropriate. The 90% confidence interval is (-0.20453, 0.10453). Since this interval contains zero, we can't be 90% confident that one proportion is less than the other.

Step by step solution

01

Check Normal Approximation Appropriateness

For using the normal approximation for the difference in proportions, both sample sizes must meet the conditions of the normal approximation rule. Specifically, \[ n_1 \hat{p}_1, n_2 \hat{p}_2, n_1 (1-\hat{p}_1), \text{ and } n_2 (1-\hat{p}_2) \]all must be greater than 5.Calculate for the first sample:\[ \hat{p}_1 = \frac{10}{40} = 0.25 \]Check: \[ 40 \times 0.25 = 10 \] and \[ 40 \times 0.75 = 30 \]Calculate for the second sample:\[ \hat{p}_2 = \frac{15}{50} = 0.3 \]Check:\[ 50 \times 0.3 = 15 \] and \[ 50 \times 0.7 = 35 \]All these values are greater than 5, so it's appropriate to use normal approximation.
02

Calculate the Standard Error

The standard error (SE) for \( \hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2 \) is given by:\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}_1 (1-\hat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\hat{p}_2 (1-\hat{p}_2)}{n_2}} \]Substitute the values:\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.25 \times 0.75}{40} + \frac{0.3 \times 0.7}{50}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.1875}{40} + \frac{0.21}{50}} = \sqrt{0.0046875 + 0.0042} = \sqrt{0.0088875} \approx 0.094 \]
03

Find the Z-score for 90% Confidence Interval

To find a confidence interval at 90%, we use the Z-score for 0.05 in each tail of the normal distribution, which is 1.645.
04

Calculate the Confidence Interval

The formula for the confidence interval of \( p_1 - p_2 \) is:\[ (\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2) \pm Z \times SE \]Substitute the values:\[ (0.25 - 0.3) \pm 1.645 \times 0.094 \]This simplifies to:\[ -0.05 \pm 0.15453 \]Thus, the confidence interval is:\[ (-0.20453, 0.10453) \]
05

Interpretation of Confidence Interval

The confidence interval \((-0.20453, 0.10453)\) includes zero, which means there is no statistically significant difference between the proportions \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) at the 90% confidence level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Binomial Distribution
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution that summarizes the likelihood that a value will take one of two independent states and is often used for scenarios with a fixed number of trials or experiments. This model is especially useful when evaluating outcomes in a process with two possibilities such as 'success' and 'failure'.

For instance, in the context of the exercise, we examine two separate binomial distributions: the first with 40 trials resulting in 10 successes, and the second with 50 trials leading to 15 successes.
  • The probability of success for the first sample is computed as \( \hat{p}_1 = \frac{10}{40} = 0.25 \).
  • The probability of success for the second sample is \( \hat{p}_2 = \frac{15}{50} = 0.3 \).
Exploring such distributions aids in understanding the underlying probabilities of real-world binary outcomes.
Normal Approximation
When dealing with binomial distributions, the normal approximation is a helpful technique used when the sample sizes are large enough. This approximation simplifies calculations by using the normal distribution instead. The rule of thumb is that the product of the number of trials and the probability of success (as well as failure) should each exceed five.

In our case, for both samples, these factors are satisfied:
  • For the first sample, \( n_1 \hat{p}_1 = 40 \times 0.25 = 10 \) and \( n_1(1 - \hat{p}_1) = 30 \).
  • For the second sample, \( n_2 \hat{p}_2 = 50 \times 0.3 = 15 \) and \( n_2(1 - \hat{p}_2) = 35 \).
By confirming these conditions, we can proceed to use the normal approximation to explore the difference in proportions further.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) is a critical concept in statistical analysis that measures the amount by which a sample mean or proportion would tend to vary by chance. When evaluating differences of sample proportions, it helps us gauge the precision of our estimate.

We calculate the SE for the difference in proportions using the formula:
\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}_1(1-\hat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\hat{p}_2(1-\hat{p}_2)}{n_2}} \]
Substituting the values provided, we find:
  • First proportion contribution: \( \frac{0.25 \times 0.75}{40} = 0.0046875 \)
  • Second proportion contribution: \( \frac{0.3 \times 0.7}{50} = 0.0042 \)
Adding these gives \( \sqrt{0.0088875} \approx 0.094 \). This standard error indicates how much the differences in sample proportions might vary.
Z-score
The Z-score is a statistical measurement that describes a value's relationship to the mean of a group of values. It's expressed in terms of standard deviations from the mean. For confidence intervals, the Z-score indicates how many standard deviations away we can expect our confidence limits to be.

For a 90% confidence interval, we look for what value would capture 90% of the area under the standard normal distribution curve. This is approximately 1.645 for each tail when summed together. Understanding and using Z-scores is crucial for estimating confidence intervals accurately, as they enable us to account for the desired level of certainty in our statistical statements.

Therefore, in constructing our confidence interval: \( Z \times SE \) illustrates where we expect our actual proportions' difference to fall.
Difference of Proportions
The difference of proportions measures the disparity between two independent sample proportions and is essential for determining if these proportions come from the same distribution or differ significantly.

In the context of the exercise, we determine a confidence interval for this difference using:
\[ (\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2) \pm Z \times SE \]
With values given, this becomes:
\[ (0.25 - 0.3) \pm 1.645 \times 0.094 \]
This computation provides a confidence interval of \((-0.20453, 0.10453)\). Since this range includes zero, the result indicates no clear statistical difference between the proportions at a 90% confidence level.

This analysis helps determine if the two proportions are indeed different and by how much, presenting a better understanding of the experimental outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sam computed a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu\) from a specific random sample. His confidence interval was \(10.1<\mu<12.2 .\) He claims that the probability that \(\mu\) is in this interval is \(0.95 .\) What is wrong with his claim?

Suppose \(x\) has a normal distribution with \(\sigma=6 .\) A random sample of size 16 has sample mean \(50 .\) (a) Is it appropriate to use a normal distribution to compute a confidence interval for the population mean \(\mu ?\) Explain. (b) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu\) (c) Explain the meaning of the confidence interval you computed.

Isabel Myers was a pioneer in the study of personality types. She identified four basic personality preferences, which are described at length in the book \(A\) Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator by Myers and McCaulley (Consulting Psychologists Press). Marriage counselors know that couples who have none of the four preferences in common may have a stormy marriage. Myers took a random sample of 375 married couples and found that 289 had two or more personality preferences in common. In another random sample of 571 married couples, it was found that only 23 had no preferences in common. Let \(p_{1}\) be the population proportion of all married couples who have two or more personality preferences in common. Let \(p_{2}\) be the population proportion of all married couples who have no personality preferences in common. (a) Can a normal distribution be used to approximate the \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\) distribution? Explain. (b) Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) (c) Explain the meaning of the confidence interval in part (a) in the context of this problem. Does the confidence interval contain all positive, all negative, or both positive and negative numbers? What does this tell you (at the \(99 \%\) confidence level) about the proportion of married couples with two or more personality preferences in common compared with the proportion of married couples sharing no personality preferences in common?

What about the sample size \(n\) for confidence intervals for the difference of proportions \(p_{1}-p_{2} ?\) Let us make the following assumptions: equal sample sizes \(n=n_{1}=n_{2}\) and all four quantities \(n_{1} \hat{p}_{1}, n_{1} \hat{q}_{1}, n_{2} \hat{p}_{2},\) and \(n_{2} \hat{q}_{2}\) are greater than \(5 .\) Those readers familiar with algebra can use the procedure outlined in Problem 28 to show that if we have preliminary estimates \(\hat{p}_{1}\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}\) and a given maximal margin of error \(E\) for a specified confidence level \(c,\) then the sample size \(n\) should be at least $$n=\left(\frac{z_{c}}{E}\right)^{2}\left(\hat{p}_{1} \hat{q}_{1}+\hat{p}_{2} \hat{q}_{2}\right)$$ However, if we have no preliminary estimates for \(\hat{p}_{1}\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}\), then the theory similar to that used in this section tells us that the sample size \(n\) should be at least $$n=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{z_{c}}{F}\right)^{2}$$ (a) In Problem 17 (Myers-Briggs personality type indicators in common for married couples), suppose we want to be \(99 \%\) confident that our estimate \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\) for the difference \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) has a maximal margin of error \(E=0.04 .\) Use the preliminary estimates \(\hat{p}_{1}=289 / 375\) for the proportion of couples sharing two personality traits and \(\hat{p}_{2}=23 / 571\) for the proportion having no traits in common. How large should the sample size be (assuming equal sample size-i.e., \(n=n_{1}=n_{2}\) )? (b) Suppose that in Problem 17 we have no preliminary estimates for \(\hat{p}_{1}\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}\) and we want to be \(95 \%\) confident that our estimate \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\) for the difference \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) has a maximal margin of error \(E=0.05 .\) How large should the sample size be (assuming equal sample size-i.e., \(n=n_{1}=n_{2}\) )?

In order to use a normal distribution to compute confidence intervals for \(p,\) what conditions on \(n p\) and \(n q\) need to be satisfied?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.