/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 Spring Break: Caribbean Cruise T... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Spring Break: Caribbean Cruise The college student senate is sponsoring a spring break Caribbean cruise raffle. The proceeds are to be donated to the Samaritan Center for the Homeless. A local travel agency donated the cruise, valued at 2000 dollar. The students sold 2852 raffle tickets at 5 dollar per ticket. (a) Kevin bought six tickets. What is the probability that Kevin will win the spring break cruise to the Caribbean? What is the probability that Kevin will not win the cruise? (b) Expected earnings can be found by multiplying the value of the cruise by the probability that Kevin will win. What are Kevin's expected earnings? Is this more or less than the amount Kevin paid for the six tickets? How much did Kevin effectively contribute to the Samaritan Center for the Homeless?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Kevin is unlikely to win with only 6 out of 2852 tickets; his expected earnings are less than \$30. His main contribution to the Samaritan Center is effectively all of his \$30.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Total Probability

The total number of tickets sold is 2852, so the total probability space is 2852 possibilities.
02

Find Winning Probability for Kevin

Since Kevin bought 6 tickets, the probability that he wins is the number of tickets he purchased over the total tickets sold. Therefore, the probability Kevin wins is \( \frac{6}{2852} \).
03

Calculate Probability of Not Winning

The probability that Kevin does not win is the complement of him winning, which is 1 minus the probability he does win. Thus, the probability that Kevin does not win is \( 1 - \frac{6}{2852} \).
04

Calculate Kevin's Expected Earnings

The expected earnings for Kevin is the value of the cruise multiplied by the probability that he wins. The cruise is valued at \$2000. So, Kevin's expected earnings are \( 2000 \times \frac{6}{2852} \).
05

Compare Expected Earnings with Expense

Calculate Kevin's total expense and compare it to his expected earnings. He bought 6 tickets and each costs \\(5, so he spent \\)30. Compare \$30 with the expected earnings from Step 4 to determine if Kevin spent more or less.
06

Determine Effective Contribution

Determine how much Kevin effectively contributed to the Samaritan Center. His effective contribution is the amount he paid minus his expected earnings from winning the cruise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Expected Value
Expected value is a key concept in probability and statistics, providing an average outcome of experiments over the long run. It serves as a predictive tool, letting us see what we might expect if we could repeat a probability experiment many times.
For Kevin, who purchased 6 raffle tickets, his expected value for winning the cruise is calculated by multiplying the value of the prize by his probability of winning.
The value of the cruise is $2000. Given that Kevin's probability of winning is \( \frac{6}{2852} \), his expected earnings are:
  • Expected Earnings = Value of Prize × Probability of Winning
  • = \( 2000 \times \frac{6}{2852} \)
This calculation yields Kevin's expected value, representing the average amount he could expect to earn given the probability of winning the cruise for every 2852 tickets drawn.
Complement Rule in Probability
The complement rule is a fundamental strategy in probability that simplifies many calculations. It states that the probability of an event not happening is 1 minus the probability that it does happen.
In the case of Kevin's raffle scenario, we first determine the probability of Kevin winning with his 6 tickets out of 2852 sold, which is \(\frac{6}{2852}\).
Then, to find out the probability that Kevin does not win, we apply the complement rule:
  • Probability of Not Winning = 1 - Probability of Winning
  • = 1 - \(\frac{6}{2852}\)
This rule is very useful because often it can be much easier to calculate the probability of an event not occurring instead of directly calculating the event itself.
Fundamentals of Probability
Fundamentals of probability are essential for understanding various random processes, including raffles. Probability, in simple terms, measures the likelihood of an event happening, with values ranging from 0 (an impossible event) to 1 (a certain event).
Kevin's probability of winning the raffle is a straightforward application of these fundamentals.
The formula used for Kevin's winning probability considers:
  • The number of winning outcomes for Kevin (the 6 tickets he bought)
  • The total possible outcomes (all 2852 tickets sold)
  • Winning Probability = Number of Favorable Outcomes / Total Number of Outcomes
  • = \(\frac{6}{2852}\)
Understanding probability involves not just calculating likelihoods but also interpreting them in the context of real-world scenarios, such as this raffle, where Kevin's chance of winning is just one piece of the total probability puzzle.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Bob is a recent law school graduate who intends to take the state bar exam. According to the National Conference on Bar Examiners, about \(57 \%\) of all people who take the state bar exam pass (Source: The Book of Odds by Shook and Shook, Signet). Let \(n=1,2,3, \ldots\) represent the number of times a person takes the bar exam until the first pass. (a) Write out a formula for the probability distribution of the random variable \(n .\) (b) What is the probability that Bob first passes the bar exam on the second \(\operatorname{try}(n=2) ?\) (c) What is the probability that Bob needs three attempts to pass the bar exam? (d) What is the probability that Bob needs more than three attempts to pass the bar exam? (e) What is the expected number of attempts at the state bar exam Bob must make for his (first) pass? Hint: Use \(\mu\) for the geometric distribution and round.

Insurance Risk Insurance companies know the risk of insurance is greatly reduced if the company insures not just one person, but many people. How does this work? Let \(x\) be a random variable representing the expectation of life in years for a 25 -year-old male (i.e., number of years until death). Then the mean and standard deviation of \(x\) are \(\mu=50.2\) years and \(\sigma=11.5\) years (Vital Statistics Section of the Statistical Abstract of the United States, 116th edition). Suppose Big Rock Insurance Company has sold life insurance policies to Joel and David. Both are 25 years old, unrelated, live in different states, and have about the same health record. Let \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) be random variables representing Joel's and David's life expectancies. It is reasonable to assume \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) are independent. $$\begin{aligned} &\text { Joel, } x_{1}: \mu_{1}=50.2 ; \sigma_{1}=11.5\\\ &\text { David, } x_{2}: \mu_{2}=50.2 ; \sigma_{2}=11.5 \end{aligned}$$ If life expectancy can be predicted with more accuracy, Big Rock will have less risk in its insurance business. Risk in this case is measured by \(\sigma\) (larger \(\sigma\) means more risk). (a) The average life expectancy for Joel and David is \(W=0.5 x_{1}+0.5 x_{2}\) Compute the mean, variance, and standard deviation of \(W\). (b) Compare the mean life expectancy for a single policy \(\left(x_{1}\right)\) with that for two policies \((W).\) (c) Compare the standard deviation of the life expectancy for a single policy \(\left(x_{1}\right)\) with that for two policies \((W).\) (d) The mean life expectancy is the same for a single policy \(\left(x_{1}\right)\) as it is for two policies \((W),\) but the standard deviation is smaller for two policies. What happens to the mean life expectancy and the standard deviation when we include more policies issued to people whose life expectancies have the same mean and standard deviation (i.e., 25 -year-old males)? For instance, for three policies, \(W=(\mu+\mu+\mu) / 3=\mu\) and \(\sigma_{W}^{2}=(1 / 3)^{2} \sigma^{2}+(1 / 3)^{2} \sigma^{2}+(1 / 3)^{2} \sigma^{2}=\) \((1 / 3)^{2}\left(3 \sigma^{2}\right)=(1 / 3) \sigma^{2}\) and \(\sigma_{W}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \sigma .\) Likewise, for \(n\) such policies, \(W=\mu\) and \(\sigma_{W}^{2}=(1 / n) \sigma^{2}\) and \(\sigma_{W}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \sigma .\) Looking at the general result, is it appropriate to say that when we increase the number of policies to \(n\), the risk decreases by a factor of \(\sigma_{W}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} ?\)

Basic Computation: Geometric Distribution Given a binomial experiment with probability of success on a single trial \(p=0.30,\) find the probability that the first success occurs on trial number \(n=2\).

Trevor is interested in purchasing the local hardware/sporting goods store in the small town of Dove Creck, Montana. After examining accounting records for the past several years, he found that the store has been grossing over 850 per day about 60 of the business days it is open. Estimate the probability that the store will gross over 850 (a) at least 3 out of 5 business days. (b) at least 6 out of 10 business days. (c) fewer than 5 out of 10 business days. (d) fewer than 6 out of the next 20 business days. Interpretation If this actually happened, might it shake your confidence in the statement \(p=0.60 ?\) Might it make you suspect that \(p\) is less than \(0.60 ?\) Explain. (e) more than 17 out of the next 20 business days. Interpretation If this actually happened, might you suspect that \(p\) is greater than \(0.60 ?\) Explain.

In his doctoral thesis, L. A. Beckel (University of Minnesota, 1982 ) studied the social behavior of river otters during the mating season. An important role in the bonding process of river otters is very short periods of social grooming. After extensive observations, Dr. Beckel found that one group of river otters under study had a frequency of initiating grooming of approximately 1.7 for every 10 minutes. Suppose that you are observing river otters for 30 minutes. Let \(r=0,1,2, \ldots\) be a random variable that represents the number of times (in a 30-minute interval) one otter initiates social grooming of another. (a) Explain why the Poisson distribution would be a good choice for the probability distribution of \(r\) What is \(\lambda\) ? Write out the formula for the probability distribution of the random variable \(r\) (b) Find the probabilities that in your 30 minutes of observation, one otter will initiate social grooming four times, five times, and six times. (c) Find the probability that one otter will initiate social grooming four or more times during the 30 -minute observation period. (d) Find the probability that one otter will initiate social grooming fewer than four times during the 30 -minute observation period.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.