/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Please provide the following inf... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Please provide the following information. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. (b) Compute the sample test statistic. (c) Find or estimate the \(P\) -value of the sample test statistic. (d) Conclude the test. (e) Interpret the conclusion in the context of the application. Economics: Stocks As an economics class project, Debbie studied a random sample of 14 stocks. For each of these stocks, she found the cost per share (in dollars) and ranked each of the stocks according to cost. After 3 months, she found the earnings per share for each stock (in dollars). Again, Debbie ranked each of the stocks according to earnings. The way Debbie ranked, higher ranks mean higher cost and higher earnings. The results follow, where \(x\) is the rank in cost and \(y\) is the rank in earnings. $$\begin{array}{|l|cccccccccccccc} \hline \text { Stock } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & 14 \\ \hline x \text { rank } & 5 & 2 & 4 & 7 & 11 & 8 & 12 & 3 & 13 & 14 & 10 & 1 & 9 & 6 \\ \hline y \text { rank } & 5 & 13 & 1 & 10 & 7 & 3 & 14 & 6 & 4 & 12 & 8 & 2 & 11 & 9 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ Using a 0.01 level of significance, test the claim that there is a monotone relation, cither way, between the ranks of cost and earnings.

Short Answer

Expert verified
At 0.01 significance, we find a test statistic and compare its P-value to decide on monotone rank correlation, concluding if there's an economic link.

Step by step solution

01

Determine Level of Significance and State Hypotheses

The level of significance is given as 0.01. We need to state the null and alternate hypotheses for testing a rank correlation. **Null Hypothesis ( H_0 ):** There is no monotone relation between the cost rank and earnings rank. **Alternate Hypothesis ( H_1 ):** There is a monotone relation between the cost rank and earnings rank.
02

Calculate Differences and Squared Differences

For each pair of ranks, calculate the difference ( D_i = x_i - y_i ), where D_i is the difference, x_i is the rank of cost, and y_i is the rank of earnings. Then, compute the squared differences ( D_i^2 ). Example calculations: 1. For Stock 1: D = 5 - 5 = 0 , D^2 = 0 . This is done for all stocks.
03

Compute Test Statistic (Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient)

The test statistic is given by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ( ho) formula:\[\rho = 1 - \frac{6 \sum D_i^2}{n(n^2 - 1)}\]where \(\sum D_i^2\) is the sum of the squared differences computed in Step 2, and n = 14 is the number of stocks. Insert the calculated values to compute \rho.
04

Estimate the P-value

Once we have ho , we can use statistical tables or software to estimate the P -value corresponding to the test statistic for n - 2 degrees of freedom. Compare the P -value with the level of significance (0.01).
05

Conclude the Test

If the P -value is less than the significance level (0.01), reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis. This determination will indicate whether there is a significant monotone relation between cost and earnings.
06

Interpret the Conclusion

Interpret the results in terms of the economics context. If you rejected the null hypothesis, it means there is significant evidence to suggest a monotone relationship exists between cost and earnings ranks among the stocks. If not, there is no significant evidence supporting such a relation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Level of Significance
In hypothesis testing, the level of significance is a critical threshold that determines the likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. It is denoted by the Greek letter \( \alpha \).
For instance, if the level of significance is set at 0.01, there is a 1% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is no actual difference. This threshold is chosen by researchers before conducting the test. It helps in assessing how strict the criteria are for concluding a significant result.
Key points about the level of significance:
  • It is a probability value that indicates the risk of a Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis.
  • Commonly used significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10.
  • A lower \( \alpha \) means stricter criteria for significance, reducing the risk of false positives.
For Debbie's stock analysis, a 0.01 significance level indicates a stringent test where only results with strong evidence against the null hypothesis will be considered significant.
Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient helps in measuring the strength and direction of association between two ranked variables. It is a non-parametric test, meaning it's distribution-free, and useful when the data doesn't conform to a normal distribution.
This coefficient is particularly beneficial when dealing with rank data or ordinal data, where the intervals between values are not of equal size. It works by converting raw scores to ranks and examining the disparities between them.The calculation involves:
  • Rank each set of data. In Debbie's project, she ranks stocks first by cost and then by earnings.
  • Compute the difference between the ranks for each item.
  • Square these differences and find their sum.
  • Use the formula: \[\rho = 1 - \frac{6 \sum D_i^2}{n(n^2 - 1)}\] where \( \rho \) is the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, \( D_i \) is the difference between ranks for each pair, and \( n \) is the number of pairs.
A \( \rho \) value close to +1 or -1 indicates a strong monotone relationship, while a \( \rho \) close to 0 suggests a weak or no monotone relationship.
Null and Alternate Hypotheses
In any statistical test, defining the null and alternate hypotheses is essential. These hypotheses are mutually exclusive statements about a population:
  • The **Null Hypothesis (\( H_0\))** asserts that there is no effect or no difference. In Debbie's context, it suggests that there is no monotone relation between the cost ranks and earnings ranks of the stocks.
  • The **Alternate Hypothesis (\( H_1\))** posits that there is an effect or a difference. For Debbie's study, this implies that a monotone relationship does exist between the costs and earnings ranks.
The purpose of the hypothesis test is to determine which of these hypotheses is supported by the sample data.
If the test results lead to a statistically significant finding (meaning the p-value is less than the level of significance), the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative. Conversely, if the test lacks significance, the null hypothesis is not rejected.
This logical structure forms the backbone of statistical hypothesis testing, helping determine the direction of the research findings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Please provide the following information. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. (b) Compute the sample test statistic. (c) Find or estimate the \(P\) -value of the sample test statistic. (d) Conclude the test. (e) Interpret the conclusion in the context of the application. FBI Report: Murder and Arson Is there a relation between murder and arson? A random sample of 15 Midwest cities (over 10,000 population) gave the following information about annual number of murder and arson cases (Reference: Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice). $$\begin{array}{l|ccccccccccccccc} \hline \text { City } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & 14 & 15 \\ \hline \text { Murder } & 12 & 7 & 25 & 4 & 10 & 15 & 9 & 8 & 11 & 18 & 23 & 19 & 21 & 17 & 6 \\ \hline \text { Arson } & 62 & 12 & 153 & 2 & 63 & 93 & 31 & 29 & 47 & 131 & 175 & 129 & 162 & 115 & 4 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ (i) Rank-order murder using 1 as the largest data value. Also rank-order arson using 1 as the largest data value. Then construct a table of ranks to be used for a Spearman rank correlation test. (ii) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that there is a monotoneincreasing relationship between the ranks of murder and arson.

To compare two elementary schools regarding teaching of reading skills, 12 sets of identical twins were used. In each case, one child was selected at random and sent to school \(A\), and his or her twin was sent to school B. Near the end of fifth grade, an achievement test was given to each child. The results follow: $$\begin{array}{|l|cccccc} \hline \text { Twin Pair } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \hline \text { School A } & 177 & 150 & 112 & 95 & 120 & 117 \\ \hline \text { School B } & 86 & 135 & 115 & 110 & 116 & 84 \\ \hline \\ \hline \text { Twin Pair } & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 \\ \hline \text { School A } & 86 & 111 & 110 & 142 & 125 & 89 \\ \hline \text { School B } & 93 & 77 & 96 & 130 & 147 & 101 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ Use a 0.05 level of significance to test the hypothesis that the two schools have the same effectiveness in teaching reading skills against the alternate hypothesis that the schools are not equally effective.

Please provide the following information. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. (b) Compute the sample test statistic. (c) Find or estimate the \(P\) -value of the sample test statistic. (d) Conclude the test. (e) Interpret the conclusion in the context of the application. FBI Report: Child Abuse and Runaway Children Is there a relation between incidents of child abuse and number of runaway children? A random sample of 15 cities (over 10,000 population) gave the following information about the number of reported incidents of child abuse and the number of runaway children (Reference: Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice). $$\begin{array}{|l|ccccccccccccccc} \hline \text { City } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & 14 & 15 \\ \hline \text { Abuse cases } & 49 & 74 & 87 & 10 & 26 & 119 & 35 & 13 & 89 & 45 & 53 & 22 & 65 & 38 & 29 \\ \hline \text { Runaways } & 382 & 510 & 581 & 163 & 210 & 791 & 275 & 153 & 491 & 351 & 402 & 209 & 410 & 312 & 210 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ (i) Rank-order abuse using 1 as the largest data value. Also rank-order runaways using 1 as the largest data value. Then construct a table of ranks to be used for a Spearman rank correlation test. (ii) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that there is a monotoneincreasing relationship between the ranks of incidents of abuse and number of runaway children.

Consider the Spearman rank correlation coefficient \(r_{s}\) for data pairs \((x, y) .\) What is the monotone relationship, if any, between \(x\) and \(y\) implied by a value of (a) \(r_{s}=0 ?\) (b) \(r\) close to \(1 ?\) (c) \(r_{s}\) close to \(-1 ?\)

Suppose your data consist of a sequence of numbers. To apply a runs test for randomness about the median, what process do you use to convert the numbers into two distinct symbols?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.