/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 Over the past 50 years, there ha... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Over the past 50 years, there has been a strong negative correlation between average annual income and the record time to run 1 mile. In other words, average annual incomes have been rising while the record time to run 1 mile has been decreasing. (a) Do you think increasing incomes cause decreasing times to run the mile? Explain. (b) What lurking variables might be causing the increase in one or both of the variables? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) No, rising incomes likely don't cause faster mile times. (b) Lurking variables include sports science advancements and economic growth, affecting both variables.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Relationship

A negative correlation between average annual income and record time to run 1 mile indicates that as one variable increases, the other decreases. Hence, as incomes have risen, the time to run a mile has reduced.
02

Assess Causation

Correlation does not imply causation. Just because there is a pattern between rising incomes and decreasing mile times, it doesn't mean increasing income causes faster mile times.
03

Identify Lurking Variables

Lurking variables that might explain both phenomena include improvements in sports science and healthcare, leading to better athletic performance, and broader economic growth, leading to higher incomes. Other potential variables include advancements in training techniques and increased funding for athletic programs, which can influence both income and performance.
04

Conclude Analysis

Given the identified lurking variables, the decrease in mile times and rise in incomes likely happen concurrently due to overall societal improvements rather than one causing the other.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation vs Causation
In statistics, understanding the difference between correlation and causation is crucial. Correlation refers to a relationship or connection between two variables where they tend to occur together. For instance, in our exercise, average annual incomes and mile running times have a strong negative correlation. This means as income has increased, the time it takes to run a mile has decreased.

However, this doesn't mean one causes the other. This is where causation comes in. Causation implies that one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event; in simple terms, it means one event is a consequence of another. Just because two variables show a consistent pattern together, it doesn’t guarantee that one directly influences the other.
  • Correlation = Association
  • Causation = Cause-and-Effect
Think of this as a reminder that statistics require careful interpretation, and not all relationships are direct or causal.
Lurking Variables
Lurking variables can sometimes obscure the real story behind the data. These are hidden variables that affect both the independent and dependent variables in a study, leading observers to a false conclusion.

In the discussed exercise, there might be several lurking variables influencing the changes in both average incomes and mile-running times. Advances in sports science, better healthcare, and improved athletic training are just a few examples of factors that could lead to better athletic performance and economic prosperity simultaneously. These variables improve people’s capacity to earn more while also enhancing physical capabilities by offering better training and nutrition.
Understanding these hidden variables can help to avoid incorrect assumptions that one variable necessarily causes changes in another.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis involves gathering, reviewing, and interpreting data to uncover patterns and trends. It's essential for drawing valid conclusions and making informed decisions.

For our scenario of annual incomes and mile-running times, proper statistical analysis would involve identifying factors beyond the obvious. This includes looking for patterns over time, considering data collection methods, and accounting for additional context like economic trends and societal developments.
Statistical analysis helps clarify whether correlations might represent causation or are simply coincidental. By scrutinizing a broader dataset and considering all potential variables, analysts can provide evidence-based conclusions and avoid misleading results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the symbol used for the population correlation coefficient?

What is the optimal amount of time for a scuba diver to be on the bottom of the ocean? That depends on the depth of the dive. The U.S. Navy has done a lot of research on this topic. The Navy defines the "optimal time" to be the time at each depth for the best balance between length of work period and decompression time after surfacing. Let \(x=\) depth of dive in meters, and let \(y=\) optimal time in hours. A random sample of divers gave the following data (based on information taken from Medical Physiology by A. C. Guyton, M.D.). $$ \begin{array}{c|ccccccc} \hline x & 14.1 & 24.3 & 30.2 & 38.3 & 51.3 & 20.5 & 22.7 \\ \hline y & 2.58 & 2.08 & 1.58 & 1.03 & 0.75 & 2.38 & 2.20 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Verify that \(\Sigma x=201.4, \quad \Sigma y=12.6, \quad \Sigma x^{2}=6734.46, \quad \Sigma y^{2}=25.607\), \(\Sigma x y=311.292\), and \(r \approx-0.976\). (b) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\rho<0\). (c) Verify that \(S_{e} \approx 0.1660, a \approx 3.366\), and \(b \approx-0.0544\). (d) Find the predicted optimal time in hours for a dive depth of \(x=18\) meters. (e) Find an \(80 \%\) confidence interval for \(y\) when \(x=18\) meters. (f) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\beta<0\). (g) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta\) and its meaning.

Let \(x\) be a random variable that represents the percentage of successful free throws a professional basketball player makes in a season. Let \(y\) be a random variable that represents the percentage of successful field goals a professional basketball player makes in a season. A random sample of \(n=6\) professional basketball players gave the following information (Reference: The Official NBA Basketball Encyclopedia, Villard Books). $$ \begin{array}{c|cccccc} \hline x & 67 & 65 & 75 & 86 & 73 & 73 \\ \hline y & 44 & 42 & 48 & 51 & 44 & 51 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Verify that \(\Sigma x=439, \quad \Sigma y=280, \quad \Sigma x^{2}=32,393, \quad \Sigma y^{2}=13,142\), \(\Sigma x y=20,599\), and \(r \approx 0.784 .\) (b) Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\rho>0\). (c) Verify that \(S_{e} \approx 2.6964, a \approx 16.542, b \approx 0.4117\), and \(\bar{x} \approx 73.167\). (d) Find the predicted percentage \(\hat{y}\) of successful field goals for a player with \(x=70 \%\) successful free throws. (e) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(y\) when \(x=70\). (f) Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\beta>0\). (g) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta\) and its meaning.

It is not obvious from the formulas, but the values of the sample test statistic \(t\) for the correlation coefficient and for the slope of the least- squares line are equal for the same data set. This fact is based on the relation $$ b=r \frac{s_{y}}{s_{x}} $$ where \(s_{y}\) and \(s_{x}\) are the sample standard deviations of the \(x\) and \(y\) values, respectively. (a) Many computer software packages give the \(t\) value and corresponding \(P\) -value for \(b\). If \(\beta\) is significant, is \(\rho\) significant? (b) When doing statistical tests "by hand," it is easier to compute the sample test statistic \(t\) for the sample correlation coefficient \(r\) than it is to compute the sample test statistic \(t\) for the slope \(b\) of the sample least- squares line. Compare the results of parts (b) and (f) for Problems \(7-12\) of this problem set. Is the sample test statistic \(t\) for \(r\) the same as the corresponding test statistic for \(b\) ? If you conclude that \(\rho\) is positive, can you conclude that \(\beta\) is positive at the same level of significance? If you conclude that \(\rho\) is not significant, is \(\beta\) also not significant at the same level of significance?

The following data are based on information from Domestic Affairs. Let \(x\) be the average number of employees in a group health insurance plan, and let \(y\) be the average administrative cost as a percentage of claims. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrr} \hline x & 3 & 7 & 15 & 35 & 75 \\ \hline y & 40 & 35 & 30 & 25 & 18 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Make a scatter diagram and draw the line you think best fits the data. (b) Would you say the correlation is low, moderate, or strong? positive or negative? (c) Use a calculator to verify that \(\Sigma x=135, \Sigma x^{2}=7133, \quad \Sigma y=148\), \(\Sigma y^{2}=4674\), and \(\Sigma x y=3040\). Compute \(r\). As \(x\) increases from 3 to 75 , does the value of \(r\) imply that \(y\) should tend to increase or decrease? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.