/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 Given the linear regression equa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Given the linear regression equation $$ x_{1}=1.6+3.5 x_{2}-7.9 x_{3}+2.0 x_{4} $$ (a) Which variable is the response variable? Which variables are the explanatory variables? (b) Which number is the constant term? List the coefficients with their corresponding explanatory variables. (c) If \(x_{2}=2, x_{3}=1\), and \(x_{4}=5\), what is the predicted value for \(x_{1} ?\) (d) Explain how each coefficient can be thought of as a "slope" under certain conditions. Suppose \(x_{3}\) and \(x_{4}\) were held at fixed but arbitrary values and \(x_{2}\) was increased by 1 unit. What would be the corresponding change in \(x_{1}\) ? Suppose \(x_{2}\) increased by 2 units. What would be the expected change in \(x_{1} ?\) Suppose \(x_{2}\) decreased by 4 units. What would be the expected change in \(x_{1} ?\) (e) Suppose that \(n=12\) data points were used to construct the given regression equation and that the standard error for the coefficient of \(x_{2}\) is \(0.419\). Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the coefficient of \(x_{2}\). (f) Using the information of part (e) and level of significance \(5 \%\), test the claim that the coefficient of \(x_{2}\) is different from zero. Explain how the conclusion of this test would affect the regression equation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Response: \(x_1\); Explanatory: \(x_2, x_3, x_4\). (b) Constant: 1.6; Coefficients: 3.5, -7.9, 2.0. (c) Predicted \(x_1 = 10.7\). (d) \(x_1\) changes by 3.5 per unit \(x_2\). (e) CI: (2.24, 4.76). (f) \(x_2\)'s coefficient is significant.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Response and Explanatory Variables

In a regression equation, the response variable is the variable we are trying to predict, and it is typically on the left-hand side of the equation. From the given regression equation \(x_{1}=1.6+3.5x_{2}-7.9x_{3}+2.0x_{4}\), the response variable is \(x_{1}\). The explanatory variables, which are the factors used to predict the response, are \(x_{2}\), \(x_{3}\), and \(x_{4}\).
02

Find the Constant Term and Coefficients

The constant term, also known as the intercept, is the standalone number in the regression equation that is not multiplied by any variable. In \(x_{1}=1.6+3.5x_{2}-7.9x_{3}+2.0x_{4}\), the constant term is \(1.6\). The coefficients are the numbers multiplying each explanatory variable: \(3.5\) for \(x_{2}\), \(-7.9\) for \(x_{3}\), and \(2.0\) for \(x_{4}\).
03

Calculate the Predicted Value of x_1

Substitute the given values of \(x_{2}=2\), \(x_{3}=1\), and \(x_{4}=5\) into the equation \(x_{1}=1.6+3.5x_{2}-7.9x_{3}+2.0x_{4}\). This gives:\[ x_{1} = 1.6 + 3.5(2) - 7.9(1) + 2.0(5) \]\[ x_{1} = 1.6 + 7.0 - 7.9 + 10.0 \]\[ x_{1} = 10.7 \]
04

Interpret Coefficients as Slopes

Each coefficient represents the change in the response variable given a one-unit change in the corresponding explanatory variable, assuming other variables remain constant. If \(x_{3}\) and \(x_{4}\) are held constant, increasing \(x_{2}\) by 1 unit increases \(x_{1}\) by \(3.5\) units. Similarly, increasing \(x_{2}\) by 2 units increases \(x_{1}\) by \(3.5 \times 2 = 7.0\) units. Decreasing \(x_{2}\) by 4 units decreases \(x_{1}\) by \(3.5 \times 4 = 14.0\) units.
05

Construct a 90% Confidence Interval for Coefficient of x_2

First calculate the critical value for \(t\) with \(n-2 = 10\) degrees of freedom at a 90% confidence level, which is approximately \(t_{0.95, 10} \approx 1.812\). The confidence interval for \(3.5\) is calculated by:\((3.5 - t \times SE, 3.5 + t \times SE) = (3.5 - 1.812 \times 0.419, 3.5 + 1.812 \times 0.419)\)This results in the confidence interval: \((2.24, 4.76)\).
06

Test the Hypothesis for the Coefficient of x_2

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) is that the coefficient of \(x_{2}\) is zero, while the alternative hypothesis \(H_1\) is that it is not zero. Calculate the test statistic:\[ t = \frac{3.5 - 0}{0.419} = 8.35 \]With a significance level of 5%, the critical value is \(t_{0.975, 10} \approx 2.228\). Since \(8.35 > 2.228\), we reject \(H_0\) and conclude the coefficient is significantly different from zero, indicating \(x_{2}\) has a meaningful impact on \(x_{1}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Response and Explanatory Variables
In a regression equation, understanding the role of response and explanatory variables is key. The response variable, often located on the left side of the equation, is what you want to predict or explain. In our example, the response variable is \(x_{1}\). It represents the outcome or the main focus of the study. On the other hand, the explanatory variables are used to explain variations in the response variable. Here, the explanatory variables are \(x_{2}, x_{3},\) and \(x_{4}\). They provide the necessary input data for the prediction model. Each one has a unique contribution to how the final outcome is calculated. Understanding these roles helps set the stage for more in-depth regression analysis.

Identifying these variables correctly is a fundamental skill when analyzing data with linear regression. It establishes a clear framework for how different factors impact your outcome.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval gives us a range within which we expect the true value of a parameter, like a regression coefficient, to lie. It's derived using the sample data and provides valuable insight into precision and reliability. For instance, when we constructed the 90% confidence interval for the coefficient of \(x_{2}\), we calculated: - Critical \(t\)-value for \(n-2=10\) degrees of freedom
- Combined it with the standard error to find the range
This resulted in the interval \([2.24, 4.76]\), suggesting that with 90% certainty, the coefficient of \(x_{2}\) lies within this range.

Confidence intervals are essential for understanding the reliability of your estimates. A narrow range indicates high precision, whereas a wider range suggests less certainty. This concept is crucial when making predictions about data behavior.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing allows us to make informed decisions based on data. In the context of linear regression, we often test whether regression coefficients are different from zero. For the coefficient of \(x_{2}\), we set up the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \beta_{2} = 0\) (it has no effect), versus the alternative \(H_{1}: \beta_{2} eq 0\).
To test this, we calculate the \(t\)-statistic which is a ratio of the estimated coefficient to its standard error: \[ t = \frac{3.5}{0.419} = 8.35 \]
We then compare this statistic to a critical value determined by our chosen significance level (5% in this case). Here, since \(8.35\) is greater than the critical value \(2.228\), we reject the null hypothesis. This means \(x_{2}\) significantly contributes to the variability in \(x_{1}\).

Hypothesis testing offers a structured way to assess the impact of predictors, ensuring that conclusions are statistically valid.
Regression Coefficients
Regression coefficients are the numerical values that multiply the explanatory variables in a regression equation. They represent the change in the response variable with each one-unit change in the explanatory variable while holding others constant. For the model \(x_{1} = 1.6 + 3.5x_{2} - 7.9x_{3} + 2.0x_{4}\), each coefficient tells a distinct story:
  • **\(3.5\)** for \(x_{2}\): Increasing \(x_{2}\) by one unit leads to a 3.5-unit increase in \(x_{1}\).
  • **\(-7.9\)** for \(x_{3}\): Increasing \(x_{3}\) by one unit results in a 7.9-unit decrease in \(x_{1}\)
  • **\(2.0\)** for \(x_{4}\): A one-unit increase in \(x_{4}\) raises \(x_{1}\) by 2.0 units

Each coefficient expresses a directional change, vital for interpreting how different predictors impact the outcome. Therefore, understanding these coefficients as 'slopes' enables us to assess how changes in predictors alter the response variable.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You are the foreman of the Bar-S cattle ranch in Colorado. A neighboring ranch has calves for sale, and you are going to buy some to add to the Bar-S herd. How much should a healthy calf weigh? Let \(x\) be the age of the calf (in weeks), and let \(y\) be the weight of the calf (in kilograms). The following information is based on data taken from The Merck Veterinary Manual (a reference used by many ranchers). $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} \hline x & 1 & 3 & 10 & 16 & 26 & 26 \\ \hline y & 42 & 50 & 75 & 100 & 150 & 200 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Complete parts (a) through (e), given \(\Sigma x=92, \Sigma y=617, \sum x^{2}=2338\), \(\Sigma y^{2}=82,389, \Sigma x y=13,642\), and \(r \approx 0.998 .\) (f) The calves you want to buy are 12 weeks old. What does the least-squares line predict for a healthy weight?

When we use a least-squares line to predict \(y\) values for \(x\) values beyond the range of \(x\) values found in the data, are we extrapolating or interpolating? Are there any concerns about such predictions?

What is the optimal amount of time for a scuba diver to be on the bottom of the ocean? That depends on the depth of the dive. The U.S. Navy has done a lot of research on this topic. The Navy defines the "optimal time" to be the time at each depth for the best balance between length of work period and decompression time after surfacing. Let \(x=\) depth of dive in meters, and let \(y=\) optimal time in hours. A random sample of divers gave the following data (based on information taken from Medical Physiology by A. C. Guyton, M.D.). $$ \begin{array}{c|ccccccc} \hline x & 14.1 & 24.3 & 30.2 & 38.3 & 51.3 & 20.5 & 22.7 \\ \hline y & 2.58 & 2.08 & 1.58 & 1.03 & 0.75 & 2.38 & 2.20 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Verify that \(\Sigma x=201.4, \quad \Sigma y=12.6, \quad \Sigma x^{2}=6734.46, \quad \Sigma y^{2}=25.607\), \(\Sigma x y=311.292\), and \(r \approx-0.976\). (b) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\rho<0\). (c) Verify that \(S_{e} \approx 0.1660, a \approx 3.366\), and \(b \approx-0.0544\). (d) Find the predicted optimal time in hours for a dive depth of \(x=18\) meters. (e) Find an \(80 \%\) confidence interval for \(y\) when \(x=18\) meters. (f) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\beta<0\). (g) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta\) and its meaning.

Is the magnitude of an earthquake related to the depth below the surface at which the quake occurs? Let \(x\) be the magnitude of an earthquake (on the Richter scale), and let \(y\) be the depth (in kilometers) of the quake below the surface at the epicenter. The following is based on information taken from the National Earthquake Information Service of the U.S. Geological Survey. Additional data may be found by visiting the Brase/Brase statistics site at $$ \begin{array}{l|lllllll} \hline x & 2.9 & 4.2 & 3.3 & 4.5 & 2.6 & 3.2 & 3.4 \\ \hline y & 5.0 & 10.0 & 11.2 & 10.0 & 7.9 & 3.9 & 5.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Make a scatter diagram and draw the line you think best fits the data. (b) Would you say the correlation is low, moderate, or strong? positive or negative? (c) Use a calculator to verify that \(\Sigma x=24.1, \Sigma x^{2}=85.75, \Sigma y=53.5\), \(\Sigma y^{2}=458.31\), and \(\Sigma x y=190.18\). Compute \(r .\) As \(x\) increases, does the value of \(r\) imply that \(y\) should tend to increase or decrease? Explain.

Prisons Does prison really deter violent crime? Let \(x\) represent percent change in the rate of violent crime and \(y\) represent percent change in the rate of imprisonment in the general U.S. population. For 7 recent years, the following data have been obtained (Source: The Crime Drop in America, edited by Blumstein and Wallman, Cambridge University Press). $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} \hline x & 6.1 & 5.7 & 3.9 & 5.2 & 6.2 & 6.5 & 11.1 \\ \hline y & -1.4 & -4.1 & -7.0 & -4.0 & 3.6 & -0.1 & -4.4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Complete parts (a) through (e), given \(\Sigma x=44.7, \Sigma y=-17.4, \Sigma x^{2}=315.85\), \(\Sigma y^{2}=116.1, \Sigma x y=-107.18\), and \(r \approx 0.084 .\) (f) Critical Thinking Considering the values of \(r\) and \(r^{2}\), does it make sense to use the least-squares line for prediction? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.