/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 For chi-square tests of independ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For chi-square tests of independence and of homogeneity, do we use a right- tailed, left-tailed, or two-tailed test?

Short Answer

Expert verified
For chi-square tests of independence and homogeneity, a right-tailed test is used.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Test

The chi-square test of independence and the test of homogeneity both aim to analyze the relationship between categorical variables. These tests determine if there is a significant association between the variables under study.
02

Test Statistic Behavior

Chi-square tests utilize the chi-square distribution, which is asymmetric, positively skewed, and defined only for non-negative values. As a result, test statistics for these tests can only occur in the positive domain.
03

Interpreting Outputs of Chi-square Tests

In a chi-square test, the further the test statistic from zero, the stronger evidence for a significant association. A high chi-square test statistic suggests a greater deviation from the null hypothesis, indicating the observed data is unlikely under the hypothesis of no association.
04

Selecting the Tail for the Test

Since we look for how far high chi-square values deviate from the expected frequencies under the null hypothesis, we focus on the right tail of the chi-square distribution to determine significance. This allows us to determine if the observed frequencies are significantly different from expected frequencies.
05

Conclusion

For chi-square tests of independence and homogeneity, we use a right-tailed test. This is because we only consider large chi-square values as evidence against the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Test of Independence
The test of independence is a statistical method used to determine if there is a relationship between two categorical variables. For example, you may want to see if gender is related to voting preference. This test helps to answer the question: Does the distribution of one variable differ depending on the category of another variable?

To conduct a test of independence, you first set up a contingency table with observed frequencies. Each cell in the table represents a possible outcome, and the values in the cells represent the counts or frequencies of occurrences for those outcomes. It's essentially a snapshot of how the two variables tend to group together.
  • This test requires that you have a sufficiently large sample size to apply the chi-square approximation.
  • The null hypothesis assumes that there is no association between the two variables.
The test of independence compares the observed frequencies with the expected frequencies—what the count would be if there were no relationship—calculated under the assumption that the variables are independent.
When your test statistic is calculated, you get a measure of how far your observations deviate from the expected frequencies. A high value suggests that the deviation is unlikely to be due to chance, leading you to consider rejecting the null hypothesis.
Test of Homogeneity
The test of homogeneity is used to compare the distribution of a categorical variable across several populations. For example, you might want to compare consumer preferences for three different brands. The fundamental question here is whether the distribution of preferences is the same among different populations.

Much like the test of independence, the test of homogeneity uses a contingency table but often focuses on different groups or populations rather than different variables. The setup, calculations, and interpretations are similar in many ways, but the context is slightly different. The key is to see if separate populations have the same distribution on the categorical variable in question.
  • The null hypothesis proposes that the distributions are homogeneous across different populations.
  • If the chi-square statistic is significantly high, it suggests that there are differences among the groups.
It is crucial to have a clear understanding of what populations or groups you are examining to decide the appropriateness of the test of homogeneity.
Right-tailed Test
The right-tailed test in chi-square tests is the methodological focus because of how the chi-square distribution behaves. Since we are dealing with squared deviations, all values are positive, creating an asymmetric distribution that skews right.

In the context of chi-square tests, you are primarily interested in whether the observed frequencies deviate significantly from the expected frequencies. Large deviations lead to larger test statistics that fall into the right tail of the distribution.
  • The right tail test is crucial because it highlights significant differences that indicate the observed data doesn't align with the null hypothesis.
  • This means your interest is in how "extreme" your test statistic is. This extremity provides evidence against the null hypothesis.
Therefore, in both tests of independence and homogeneity, a right-tailed test is used to determine if large chi-square values offer significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Chi-square Distribution
The chi-square distribution is a critical concept in understanding chi-square tests. This distribution is defined solely for non-negative values and is characterized by being positively skewed. Its shape depends on the degrees of freedom, which in chi-square tests usually reflect the number of categories minus one.

In practice, the chi-square distribution lets us assess how well observed data fits with expected data under the null hypothesis. A key feature is that as the number of degrees of freedom increases, the distribution becomes more symmetric and approaches a normal distribution.
  • The test statistic calculated in chi-square tests corresponds to this distribution, allowing us to see where our value falls.
  • The higher the test statistic, the further it lands in the right tail, signifying stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
The distribution's properties thus allow users to determine probability estimates needed to decide on the hypothesis being tested, making it an essential part of the chi-square test types discussed.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, how are the degrees of freedom computed?

Rothamsted Experimental Station (England) has studied wheat production since \(1852 .\) Each year, many small plots of equal size but different soil/fertilizer conditions are planted with wheat. At the end of the growing season, the yield (in pounds) of the wheat on the plot is measured. The following data are based on information taken from an article by G. A. Wiebe in the Journal of Agricultural Research (Vol. 50, pp. 331-357). For a random sample of years, one plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds): \(\begin{array}{llllllll}4.15 & 4.21 & 4.27 & 3.55 & 3.50 & 3.79 & 4.09 & 4.42 \\\ 3.89 & 3.87 & 4.12 & 3.09 & 4.86 & 2.90 & 5.01 & 3.39\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is \(s^{2}=0.332\). Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds): \(\begin{array}{llllllll}4.03 & 3.77 & 3.49 & 3.76 & 3.61 & 3.72 & 4.13 & 4.01 \\\ 1.59 & 4.29 & 3.78 & 3.19 & 3.84 & 3.91 & 3.66 & 4.35\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that the sample variance for this plot is \(s^{2} \approx 0.089\). Test the claim that the population variance of annual wheat production for the first plot is larger than that for the second plot. Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance.

When using the \(F\) distribution to test two variances, is it essential that each of the two populations be normally distributed? Would it be all right if the populations had distributions that were mound-shaped and more or less symmetrical?

A sociologist studying New York City ethnic groups wants to determine if there is a difference in income for immigrants from four different countries during their first year in the city. She obtained the data in the following table from a random sample of immigrants from these countries (incomes in thousands of dollars). Use a \(0.05\) level of significance to test the claim that there is no difference in the earnings of immigrants from the four different countries. $$ \begin{array}{rrcr} \text { Country I } & \text { Country II } & \text { Country III } & \text { Country IV } \\ 12.7 & 8.3 & 20.3 & 17.2 \\ 9.2 & 17.2 & 16.6 & 8.8 \\ 10.9 & 19.1 & 22.7 & 14.7 \\ 8.9 & 10.3 & 25.2 & 21.3 \\ 16.4 & & 19.9 & 19.8 \end{array} $$

Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station (see reference in Problem 5 ) were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows: \(\begin{array}{llllll}6.17 & 6.05 & 5.89 & 5.94 & 7.31 & 7.18\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lllll}7.06 & 5.79 & 6.24 & 5.91 & 6.14\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that, for the preceding data, \(s^{2} \approx 0.318\). Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat straw production (in pounds): \(\begin{array}{llllllll}6.85 & 7.71 & 8.23 & 6.01 & 7.22 & 5.58 & 5.47 & 5.86\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that, for these data, \(s^{2}=1.078\). Test the claim that there is a difference (either way) in the population variance of wheat straw production for these two plots. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.