/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Let \(x\) be a random variable t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(x\) be a random variable that represents red blood cell count \((\mathrm{RBC})\) in millions of cells per cubic millimeter of whole blood. Then \(x\) has a distribution that is approximately normal. For the population of healthy female adults, the mean of the \(x\) distribution is about \(4.8\) (based on information from Diagnostic Tests with Nursing Implications, Springhouse Corporation). Suppose that a female patient has taken six laboratory blood tests over the past several months and that the \(\mathrm{RBC}\) count data sent to the patient's doctor are \(\begin{array}{lllllll}4.9 & 4.2 & 4.5 & 4.1 & 4.4 & 4.3\end{array}\) i. Use a calculator with sample mean and sample standard deviation keys to verify that \(\bar{x}=4.40\) and \(s \approx 0.28\). ii. Do the given data indicate that the population mean \(\mathrm{RBC}\) count for this patient is lower than \(4.8\) ? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The patient's RBC count is significantly lower.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We need to verify the sample mean \(\bar{x}\) and sample standard deviation \(s\), and then determine if the patient's RBC count is significantly lower than normal, with \(\alpha = 0.05\).
02

Calculate Sample Mean

Calculate the sample mean \(\bar{x}\) by averaging the given RBC values: \( \bar{x} = \frac{4.9 + 4.2 + 4.5 + 4.1 + 4.4 + 4.3}{6} = 4.40 \). This matches the given \(\bar{x}\).
03

Calculate Sample Standard Deviation

Compute the sample standard deviation \(s\) using the formula \( s = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1}} \), where \(x_i\) are the RBC values. Perform calculations to confirm \(s \approx 0.28\).
04

State the Hypotheses

Define the null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu = 4.8 \) (no difference) and the alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \mu < 4.8 \) (mean is lower).
05

Determine the Test Statistic

Calculate the test statistic using the formula \( t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{s/\sqrt{n}} \), where \(\mu = 4.8\), \(\bar{x} = 4.40\), \(s = 0.28\), and \(n = 6\). The computed \(t\) value is \( t = \frac{4.40 - 4.8}{0.28/\sqrt{6}} \approx -3.63\).
06

Find Critical Value and Conclusion

Determine the critical \(t\) value for a one-tailed test with \(df = n-1 = 5\) at \(\alpha = 0.05\). From \(t\)-distribution, \(t_{critical} \approx -2.015\). Since \(-3.63 < -2.015\), reject \(H_0\).
07

State the Conclusion

Since the observed \(t\) value is less than the critical \(t\) value, the data indicates that the patient's mean RBC count is significantly lower than 4.8 at \(\alpha = 0.05\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Normal Distribution
The normal distribution is a fundamental concept in statistics, characterized by its bell-shaped curve that is symmetric about the mean. This distribution is often used when analyzing real-world data since many natural phenomena approximately follow it, from test scores to human heights.
  • Mean: The average value of the distribution and the center of the bell curve.
  • Standard Deviation: Measures the spread or dispersion of values around the mean.
In our exercise, the red blood cell count (RBC) is approximately normally distributed. This allows us to apply techniques like hypothesis testing, which rely on the normality of data. Using normal distribution assumptions helps in making predictions and decisions about population parameters based on sample statistics.
Sample Mean
The sample mean is the average of data points collected from a sample. It's a measure of central tendency, which summarizes the central location of the data. In our exercise:
The sample mean \(\bar{x}\) is calculated by summing all the RBC counts and dividing by the number of samples: \[ \bar{x} = \frac{4.9 + 4.2 + 4.5 + 4.1 + 4.4 + 4.3}{6} = 4.40. \]
  • It provides an estimate of the population mean.
  • Used as a basis for statistical inference.
Understanding the sample mean is critical when analyzing data, as it gives insights into the general tendency of the dataset and forms the basis for more advanced statistical analysis like hypothesis testing.
Sample Standard Deviation
The sample standard deviation provides a measure of how spread out the values are in your dataset. It is a crucial tool in statistics, helping understand how much variation there is from the mean. Calculating the sample standard deviation involves the following steps:
  • Subtract the sample mean from each data point, square the result, and sum them up.
  • Divide this sum by the total number of observations minus one.
  • Take the square root to get the sample standard deviation.
In the context of the exercise, the standard deviation is approximately 0.28. This value is used to measure the variability in the RBC counts and plays a vital role when calculating the t-distribution for hypothesis testing.
T-Distribution
In hypothesis testing, when the sample size is small or the population variance is unknown, the t-distribution is used instead of the normal distribution. The t-distribution is similar to the normal distribution but has heavier tails, which accommodates more variability when sample sizes are small. In the exercise:
The t-statistic helps us determine whether a sample mean is significantly different from a known or hypothesized population mean. We calculated the test statistic using: \[ t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{s/\sqrt{n}} \]where \(\bar{x} = 4.40\) and \(s = 0.28\). The t-distribution with df = 5 (degrees of freedom) allows us to find the critical value at \(\alpha = 0.05\).
The use of the t-distribution is crucial in our situation to accurately determine statistical significance despite having a small sample, ensuring robust conclusions based on available data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The western United States has a number of four-lane interstate highways that cut through long tracts of wilderness. To prevent car accidents with wild animals, the highways are bordered on both sides with 12 -foot-high woven wire fences. Although the fences prevent accidents, they also disturb the winter migration pattern of many animals. To compensate for this disturbance, the highways have frequent wilderness underpasses designed for exclusive use by deer, elk, and other animals. In Colorado, there is a large group of deer that spend their summer months in a region on one side of a highway and survive the winter months in a lower region on the other side. To determine if the highway has disturbed deer migration to the winter feeding area, the following data were gathered on a random sample of 10 wilderness districts in the winter feeding area. Row \(B\) represents the average January deer count for a 5 -year period before the highway was built, and row \(A\) represents the average January deer count for a 5 -year period after the highway was built. The highway department claims that the January population has not changed. Test this claim against the claim that the January population has dropped. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. Units used in the table are hundreds of deer. \(\begin{array}{l|cccccccccc} \hline \text { Wilderness District } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\\ \hline \text { B: Before highway } & 10.3 & 7.2 & 12.9 & 5.8 & 17.4 & 9.9 & 20.5 & 16.2 & 18.9 & 11.6 \\ \hline \text { A: After highway } & 9.1 & 8.4 & 10.0 & 4.1 & 4.0 & 7.1 & 15.2 & 8.3 & 12.2 & 7.3 \\ \hline \end{array}\)

Athabasca Fishing Lodge is located on Lake Athabasca in northern Canada. In one of its recent brochures, the lodge advertises that \(75 \%\) of its guests catch northern pike over 20 pounds. Suppose that last summer 64 out of a random sample of 83 guests did, in fact, catch northern pike weighing over 20 pounds. Does this indicate that the population proportion of guests who catch pike over 20 pounds is different from \(75 \%\) (either higher or lower)? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

Given \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) distributions that are normal or approximately normal with unknown \(\sigma_{1}\) and \(\sigma_{2}\), the value of \(t\) corresponding to \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) has a distribution that is approximated by a Student's \(t\) distribution. We use the convention that the degrees of freedom is approximately the smaller of \(n_{1}-1\) and \(n_{2}-1\). However, a more accurate estimate for the appropriate degrees of freedom is given by Satterthwaite's formula: $$\text { d.f. } \approx \frac{\left(\frac{s_{1}^{2}}{n_{1}}+\frac{s_{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}\right)^{2}}{\frac{1}{n_{1}-1}\left(\frac{s_{1}^{2}}{n_{1}}\right)^{2}+\frac{1}{n_{2}-1}\left(\frac{s_{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}\right)^{2}}$$ where \(s_{1}, s_{2}, n_{1}\), and \(n_{2}\) are the respective sample standard deviations and sample sizes of independent random samples from the \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) distributions. This is the approximation used by most statistical software. When both \(n_{1}\) and \(n_{2}\) are 5 or larger, it is quite accurate. The degrees of freedom computed from this formula are either truncated or not rounded. (a) In Problem 13, we tested whether the population average crime rate \(\mu_{2}\) in the Rocky Mountain region is higher than that in New England, \(\mu_{1}\). The data were \(n_{1}=10, \bar{x}_{1} \approx 3.51, s_{1} \approx 0.81, n_{2}=12, \bar{x}_{2} \approx 3.87\), and \(s_{2} \approx 0.94\). Use Satterthwaite's formula to compute the degrees of freedom for the Student's \(t\) distribution. (b) When you did Problem 13 , you followed the convention that degrees of freedom \(d . f .=\) smaller of \(n_{1}-1\) and \(n_{2}-1 .\) Compare this value of \(d . f\). with that found with Satterthwaite's formula.

When using a Student's \(t\) distribution for a paired differences test with \(n\) data pairs, what value do you use for the degrees of freedom?

Is the national crime rate really going down? Some sociologists say yes! They say that the reason for the decline in crime rates in the \(1980 \mathrm{~s}\) and \(1990 \mathrm{~s}\) is demographics. It seems that the population is aging, and older people commit fewer crimes. According to the FBI and the Justice Department, \(70 \%\) of all arrests are of males aged 15 to 34 years. (Source: True Odds, by J. Walsh, Merritt Publishing.) Suppose you are a sociologist in Rock Springs, Wyoming, and a random sample of police files showed that of 32 arrests last month, 24 were of males aged 15 to 34 years. Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that the population proportion of such arrests in Rock Springs is different from \(70 \%\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.