/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 Does talking while walking slow ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Does talking while walking slow you down? A study reported in the journal Physical Therapy (Vol. 72, No. 4 ) considered mean cadence (steps per minute) for subjects using no walking device, a standard walker, and a rolling walker. In addition, the cadence was measured when the subjects had to perform dual tasks. The second task was to respond vocally to a signal while walking. Cadence was measured for subjects who were just walking (using no device, a standard walker, or a rolling walker) and for subjects required to respond to a signal while walking. List the factors and the number of levels of each factor. How many cells are there in the data table?

Short Answer

Expert verified
There are 6 cells in the data table, with two factors: device type (3 levels) and task presence (2 levels).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Factors

In this exercise, the researchers are looking at different conditions related to walking cadence. These conditions are our factors. The primary factors we need to consider are: (1) type of walking device used, and (2) the presence of a dual task while walking.
02

Determine Levels for Each Factor

First, let's identify the levels for each factor. For the factor 'type of walking device,' there are three levels: (1) no device, (2) standard walker, and (3) rolling walker. For the factor 'presence of a dual task,' there are two levels: (1) just walking and (2) responding to a signal while walking.
03

Calculate the Number of Cells in the Data Table

Each unique combination of factor levels represents a cell in the data table. To find the total number of cells, we multiply the number of levels of one factor by the number of levels of the other factor. Therefore, the number of cells is calculated as follows: \[3 \text{ (devices)} \times 2 \text{ (tasks)} = 6 \text{ total cells}\]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Walking Cadence
When we talk about walking cadence, we are simply referring to the number of steps a person takes in a minute. This is a crucial measure in many studies on human gait and mobility as it provides insight into walking speed and control. Walking cadence can vary significantly based on various factors, including whether a person is using a walking aid or simultaneously performing another task.
In the context of the study, researchers measure cadence to understand how different conditions affect walking speed. Cadence serves as a solid quantitative measure for comparing the effects of using no device, a standard walker, or a rolling walker. Why is this important? It's because changes in cadence can indicate potential issues with balance, efficiency, or energy expenditure during walking. To ensure a consistent understanding, it's good to remember that cadence is expressed in steps per minute.
Dual Task Interference
Dual Task Interference reflects the impact of doing two things at once on a person's ability to complete one or both tasks effectively. Think of it as the cognitive load added to a person when they're asked to walk and also respond to a signal. This scenario mimics real-world conditions where distractions are common.
In the study, dual task interference occurs when the subject walks (with or without a device) while also needing to respond vocally to a signal. The presence of this second task can affect cadence because it requires participants to divide their attention between maintaining a steady walking pace and the vocal response task. This interference can slow down walking cadence as it demands cognitive resources, potentially leading to slower walking speeds or less stability. Understanding this concept helps explain why multitasking in everyday life often results in decreased performance.
Levels and Factors
In factorial design, factors and their levels are fundamental concepts. A factor is a variable controlled by the researcher to determine its effect on an outcome. Levels are the different conditions or values of these factors.
In this exercise, researchers explore two main factors: the type of walking device used and whether the subject is just walking or also responding to a signal. For the walking device, there are three levels: not using a device, using a standard walker, and using a rolling walker. For the dual task presence, there are two levels: no additional task and responding to a signal while walking.
The total number of different combinations of levels across all factors reflects in how many 'cells' or experimental conditions there are. With 3 levels of walking devices and 2 levels of dual task presence, we have 6 distinct conditions (3 multiplied by 2), providing a comprehensive view of each combination's effect on walking cadence. This structuring in data collection is key for identifying how each factor and their combinations affect walking performance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You don't need to be rich to buy a few shares in a mutual fund. The question is, how reliable are mutual funds as investments? This depends on the type of fund you buy. The following data are based on information taken from Morningstar, a mutual fund guide available in most libraries. A random sample of percentage annual returns for mutual funds holding stocks in aggressive- growth small companies is shown below. \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr}-1.8 & 14.3 & 41.5 & 17.2 & -16.8 & 4.4 & 32.6 & -7.3 & 16.2 & 2.8 \\ -10.6 & 8.4 & -7.0 & -2.3 & -18.5 & 25.0 & -9.8 & -7.8 & -24.6 & 22.8\end{array}\) \(34.3\) Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2} \approx 348.43\) for the sample of aggressive-growth small company funds. Another random sample of percentage annual returns for mutual funds holding value (i.e., market underpriced) stocks in large companies is shown below. \(3.4\) \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr}16.2 & 0.3 & 7.8 & -1.6 & -3.8 & 19.4 & -2.5 & 15.9 & 32.6 & 22.1 \\ -0.5 & -8.3 & 25.8 & -4.1 & 14.6 & 6.5 & 18.0 & 21.0 & 0.2 & -1.6\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2}=137.31\) for value stocks in large companies. Test the claim that the population variance for mutual funds holding aggressive-growth small stocks is larger than the population variance for mutual funds holding value stocks in large companies. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. How could your test conclusion relate to the question of reliability of returns for each type of mutual fund?

The quantity of dissolved oxygen is a measure of water pollution in lakes, rivers, and streams. Water samples were taken at four different locations in a river in an effort to determine if water pollution varied from location to location. Location I was 500 meters above an industrial plant water discharge point and near the shore. Location II was 200 meters above the discharge point and in midstream. Location III was 50 meters downstream from the discharge point and near the shore. Location IV was 200 meters downstream from the discharge point and in midstream. The following table shows the results. Lower dissolved oxygen readings mean more pollution. Because of the difficulty in getting midstream samples, ecology students collecting the data had fewer of these samples. Use an \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. Do we reject or not reject the claim that the quantity of dissolved oxygen does not vary from one location to another? \(\begin{array}{cccc}\text { Location I } & \text { Location II } & \text { Location III } & \text { Location IV } \\ 7.3 & 6.6 & 4.2 & 4.4 \\ 6.9 & 7.1 & 5.9 & 5.1 \\ 7.5 & 7.7 & 4.9 & 6.2 \\ 6.8 & 8.0 & 5.1 & \\ 6.2 & & 4.5 & \end{array}\)

A set of solar batteries is used in a research satellite. The satellite can run on only one battery, but it runs best if more than one battery is used. The variance \(\sigma^{2}\) of lifetimes of these batteries affects the useful lifetime of the satellite before it goes dead. If the variance is too small, all the batteries will tend to die at once. Why? If the variance is too large, the batteries are simply not dependable. Why? Engineers have determined that a variance of \(\sigma^{2}=23\) months (squared) is most desirable for these batteries. A random sample of 22 batteries gave a sample variance of \(14.3\) months (squared). (i) Using a \(0.05\) level of significance, test the claim that \(\sigma^{2}=23\) against the claim that \(\sigma^{2}\) is different from 23 . (ii) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance \(\sigma^{2}\). (iii) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population standard deviation \(\sigma .\)

The following problem is based on information taken from Accidents in North American Mountaineering (jointly published by The American Alpine Club and The Alpine Club of Canada). Let \(x\) represent the number of mountain climbers killed each year. The long-term variance of \(x\) is approximately \(\sigma^{2}=136.2\). Suppose that for the past 8 years, the variance has been \(s^{2}=115.1 .\) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that the recent variance for number of mountain-climber deaths is less than \(136.2\). Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance.

A new thermostat has been engineered for the frozen food cases in large supermarkets. Both the old and new thermostats hold temperatures at an average of \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). However, it is hoped that the new thermostat might be more dependable in the sense that it will hold temperatures closer to \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). One frozen food case was equipped with the new thermostat, and a random sample of 21 temperature readings gave a sample variance of \(5.1 .\) Another similar frozen food case was equipped with the old thermostat, and a random sample of 16 temperature readings gave a sample variance of \(12.8 .\) Test the claim that the population variance of the old thermostat temperature readings is larger than that for the new thermostat. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. How could your test conclusion relate to the question regarding the dependability of the temperature readings?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.