/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 11 Let \(p\) and q represent the fo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(p\) and q represent the following statements: $$ \begin{aligned} &p: 4+6=10 \\ &q: 5 \times 8=80 \end{aligned} $$ Determine the truth value for each statement. \(p \vee \sim q\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The truth value for the statement \(p \vee \sim q\) is true.

Step by step solution

01

Determine truth value for statement p

Verify if the statement \(p = 4 + 6 = 10\) is correct. Indeed, \(4+6\) equals to \(10\), therefore, statement \(p\) is true.
02

Determine truth value for statement q

Verify if the statement \(q = 5 \times 8 = 80\) is correct. In reality, \(5 \times 8\) equals to \(40\) and not \(80\). Therefore, statement \(q\) is false.
03

Evaluate the logical expression \(p \vee \sim q\)

The expression \(p \vee \sim q\) represents the logical OR of \(p\) and the negation of \(q\). Since \(p\) is true and \(q\) is false, the negation of \(q\) (i.e. \(\sim q\)) is true. A logical OR operation will be true if at least one of its components is true. Here, both \(p\) and \(\sim q\) are true, therefore, the whole expression \(p \vee \sim q\) is true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical OR Operation
Understanding the logical OR operation is crucial when evaluating expressions in propositional logic. Imagine you are given two propositions, and you need to use the OR operator, symbolized by \(\vee\). The OR operation between two logical statements will result in a true value if at least one of the statements is true. This is akin to saying that if you have either one or both of two conditions met, the entire expression holds.

Take, for example, when deciding if an outing is possible, you might say, 'We'll go out if it is sunny OR if I finish my work early.' Even if one condition is met, the overall plan to go out is affirmed. Similarly, in logical terms, if we have \(p \vee q\), and \(p\) is true, or \(q\) is true, or both are true, then the entire expression \(p \vee q\) is considered to be true. If both \(p\) and \(q\) are false, then and only then is \(p \vee q\) false. This is easy to remember as 'OR means just one needs to be true'.
Negation in Logic
Negation is a fundamental operation in the world of logic that flips the truth value of a statement. When you negate a proposition, symbolized by \(\sim\) or sometimes \(eg\), you're essentially saying 'it is not the case that.' If your original statement, let's call it \(q\), is true, then the negation of the statement, \(\sim q\), will be false and vice versa.

Consider you have a claim, 'The sky is blue'. The negation would be, 'The sky is not blue'. If it's a clear day and the sky is indeed blue, your original statement is true, hence the negation, claiming that the sky is not blue, would be false. This flip in truth value is a simple yet incredibly powerful tool in logic, allowing for the construction of complex arguments and the expression of straightforward denial or contradiction.
Evaluating Truth Value
Evaluating truth value is akin to checking the validity of each statement or proposition. In logic, every statement must either be true or false; there is no in-between. When you evaluate the truth value, you are essentially verifying whether the statement accurately reflects reality or not. This is a binary decision-making - much like a light switch, it is either on or off; in logic, the statement is either true or false.

In the given exercise, we applied this principle by assessing the statements \(p: 4 + 6 = 10\) and \(q: 5 \times 8 = 80\). After performing the calculations, \(p\) was found to reflect a true mathematical equation, while \(q\) was incorrect, making it false. Subsequently, we used these determined truth values to evaluate the expression \(p \vee \sim q\). By flipping the truth value of \(q\) through negation and combining it with the truth value of \(p\) using the OR operation, we established the truth value of the entire expression. To fully grasp how to evaluate truth values, practice the process systematically with various logical statements until it becomes second nature.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain how to use Euler diagrams to determine whether or not an argument is valid.

Determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. I made Euler diagrams for the premises of an argument and one of my possible diagrams did not illustrate the conclusion, so the argument is invalid.

Determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. I used Euler diagrams to determine that an argument is valid, but when I reverse one of the premises and the conclusion, this new argument is invalid.

Translate each argument into symbolic form. Then determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. You may use a truth table or, if applicable, compare the argument's symbolic form to a standard valid or invalid form. (You can ignore differences in past, present, and future tense.) If Tim and Janet play, then the team wins. Tim played and the team did not win. \(\therefore\) Janet did not play.

Based on the following argument by conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh and directed at former vice president Al Gore. You would think that if \(\mathrm{Al}\) Gore and company believe so passionately in their environmental crusading that [sic] they would first put these ideas to work in their own lives, right? ... Al Gore thinks the automobile is one of the greatest threats to the planet, but he sure as heck still travels in one of them - a gas guzzler too. (See, I Told You So, p. 168) Limbaugh's passage can be expressed in the form of an argument: If Gore really believed that the automobile were a threat to the planet, he would not travel in a gas guzzler. Gore does travel in a gas guzzler. Therefore, Gore does not really believe that the automobile is a threat to the planet. Use Limbaugh's argument to determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. I know for a fact that \(\mathrm{Al}\) Gore does not travel in a gas guzzler, so Limbaugh's argument is invalid.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.