/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Let \(p\) and q represent the fo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(p\) and q represent the following statements: $$ \begin{aligned} &p: 4+6=10 \\ &q: 5 \times 8=80 \end{aligned} $$ Determine the truth value for each statement. \(p \vee q\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The truth value of the statement 'p OR q' is true.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the truth value of statement p

The mathematical expression for statement p is 4+6=10. Check if this statement is true. The sum of 4 and 6 is 10 which matches the given expression. Hence, the statement \( p \) is true.
02

Determine the truth value of statement q

The mathematical expression for statement q is 5 * 8 = 80. In reality, 5 multiplied by 8 equals 40, not 80. Hence, the statement \( q \) is false.
03

Determine the truth value of 'p OR q'

In logic, 'p OR q' is true if at least one of the statements (p or q) is true. From the previous steps, we have determined that p is true and q is false. So, it can be concluded that 'p OR q' is true because at least one statement, \( p \), is true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Truth Value
In logic, the truth value of a statement indicates whether that statement is true or false. For any given statement, there are only two possibilities: it can either be true (often represented as "T") or false (represented as "F"). In the exercise, we evaluated the truth value of two statements:
  • The statement \( p: 4+6=10 \) was found to be true because the calculation is correct.
  • The statement \( q: 5 \times 8=80 \) was found to be false because the actual product of 5 and 8 is 40, not 80.
Understanding truth values is essential in logic as they form the basis for evaluating more complex logical expressions. Always verify the calculations involved in a statement to determine its truth value.
Logical Operators
Logical operators are tools used in logic to combine or modify statements, allowing us to form more complex expressions. The basic logical operators include AND (\( \land \)), OR (\( \lor \)), and NOT (\( eg \)). These operators help us build compound statements from simpler ones.
  • AND (\( \land \)) results in true if both statements are true. It combines statements where both conditions must be met.
  • OR (\( \lor \)) results in true if at least one of the statements is true. It offers flexibility as only one statement needs to be true for the entire expression to evaluate as true.
  • NOT (\( eg \)) negates the truth value of a statement. It flips true to false and vice versa, which is useful for forming statements that require the opposite condition to hold.
In the exercise, we especially focused on the OR logical operator, as it is used to evaluate the statement "\( p \vee q \)." Understanding logical operators is fundamental for constructing and interpreting logical expressions effectively.
Disjunction
The disjunction in logic is represented by the OR operator \( (\lor) \). It is a compound statement that connects two statements such that the compound statement is true if at least one of the component statements is true. This allows for more inclusive conditions in logical reasoning.In the exercise, the disjunction "\( p \vee q \)" was evaluated using the truth values determined from the individual statements:
  • \( p \) was true.
  • \( q \) was false.
The disjunctive expression \( p \vee q \) is evaluated as true because at least one of the statements, specifically \( p \), holds true. This property of disjunction makes it a versatile tool in scenarios where multiple conditions are evaluated, but not all need to be satisfied for a positive outcome. Embracing disjunction helps in understanding scenarios where possibilities rather than certainties are considered.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If you are given an argument in words that contains two premises and a conclusion, describe how to determine if the argument is valid or invalid.

Determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. I made Euler diagrams for the premises of an argument and one of my possible diagrams illustrated the conclusion, so the argument is valid.

In this section, we used a variety of examples, including arguments from the Menendez trial, the inevitability of Nixon's impeachment, and Spock's (fallacious) logic on Star Trek, to illustrate symbolic arguments. a. From any source that is of particular interest to you (these can be the words of someone you truly admire or a person who really gets under your skin), select a paragraph or two in which the writer argues a particular point. (An intriguing source is What Is Your Dangerous Idea?, edited by John Brockman, published by Harper Perennial, 2007.) Rewrite the reasoning in the form of an argument using words. Then translate the argument into symbolic form and use a truth table to determine if it is valid or invalid. b. Each group member should share the selected passage with other people in the group. Explain how it was expressed in argument form. Then tell why the argument is valid or invalid.

Conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh directed this passage at liberals and the way they think about crime. Of course, liberals will argue that these actions [contemporary youth crime] can be laid at the foot of socioeconomic inequities, or poverty. However, the Great Depression caused a level of poverty unknown to exist in America today, and yet I have been unable to find any accounts of crime waves sweeping our large cities. Let the liberals chew on that. (See, I Told You So, p. 83) Limbaugh's passage can be expressed in the form of an argument: If poverty causes crime, then crime waves would have swept American cities during the Great Depression. Crime waves did not sweep American cities during the Great Depression. \(\therefore\) Poverty does not cause crime. (Liberals are wrong.) Translate this argument into symbolic form and determine whether it is valid or invalid.

Translate each argument into symbolic form. Then determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. You may use a truth table or, if applicable, compare the argument's symbolic form to a standard valid or invalid form. (You can ignore differences in past, present, and future tense.) If we close the door, then there is less noise. There is less noise. \(\therefore\) We closed the door.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.